A numerical model for ground-borne vibrations from underground railway traffic based on a periodic finite element–boundary element formulation

A numerical model is presented to predict vibrations in the free field from excitation due to metro trains in tunnels. The three-dimensional dynamic tunnel–soil interaction problem is solved with a subdomain formulation, using a finite element formulation for the tunnel and a boundary element method for the soil. The periodicity of the geometry in the longitudinal direction of the tunnel is exploited using the Floquet transform, limiting the discretization to a single-bounded reference cell. The responses of two different types of tunnel due to a harmonic load on the tunnel invert are compared, both in the frequency–wavenumber and spatial domains. The first tunnel is a shallow cut-and-cover masonry tunnel on the Paris metro network, embedded in layers of sand, while the second tunnel is a deep bored tunnel of London Underground, with a cast iron lining and embedded in the London clay.

[1]  Hem Hunt,et al.  An insertion loss model for evaluating the performance of floating-slab track for underground railway tunnels , 2003 .

[2]  Dimitri E. Beskos,et al.  Dynamic analysis of large 3‐D underground structures by the bem , 1995 .

[3]  Elhabre Bou Obeid,et al.  Modélisation de l'intéraction sismique sol-fluide-parois moulées suivant une approche périodique , 2000 .

[4]  Geert Degrande,et al.  Experimental results of free field and structural vibrations due to underground railway traffic , 2003 .

[5]  T. M. Al-Hussaini,et al.  Freefield vibrations due to dynamic loading on a tunnel embedded in a stratified medium , 2005 .

[6]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  Numerical Modelling of Traffic Induced Vibrations , 2001 .

[7]  M. Hussein.  Vibration from underground railways , 2004 .

[8]  Dimitri E. Beskos,et al.  3-D seismic response analysis of long lined tunnels in half-space , 1996 .

[9]  David Thompson,et al.  Responses of infinite periodic structures to moving or stationary harmonic loads , 2005 .

[10]  M. Bampton,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. , 1968 .

[11]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  A numerical study of vibration isolation for rail traffic , 2004 .

[12]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[13]  Thambirajah Balendra,et al.  Groundborne vibrations due to trains in tunnels , 1992 .

[14]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[15]  Denis Aubry,et al.  Periodic BEM and FEM-BEM coupling , 2000 .

[16]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  Validation of a numerical model for the prediction of railway induced vibrations in the free field , 2004 .

[17]  Chris Jones,et al.  Ground vibration generated by a load moving along a railway track , 1999 .

[18]  Chris Jones,et al.  Ground vibration generated by a harmonic load acting on a railway track , 1999 .

[19]  David Thompson,et al.  Studies using a combined finite element and boundary element model for vibration propagation from railway tunnels , 2000 .

[20]  Christian Madshus,et al.  HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY LINES ON SOFT GROUND: DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR AT CRITICAL TRAIN SPEED , 2000 .

[21]  K. Chua,et al.  BUILDING RESPONSE DUE TO SUBWAY TRAIN TRAFFIC , 1995 .

[22]  Marc Bonnet,et al.  Mathematical Aspects of Boundary Element Methods , 1999 .

[23]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  An experimental validation of a numerical model for railway induced vibrations at different levels , 2004 .

[24]  M.F.M. Hussein,et al.  Dynamic effect of slab discontinutiy on underground moving trains , 2004 .

[25]  Anders E Boström,et al.  Propagation of elastic surface waves along a cylindrical cavity and their excitation by a point force , 1982 .

[26]  Geert Degrande,et al.  Vibrations due to a test train at variable speeds in a deep bored tunnel embedded in London clay , 2004 .