Weak Consistency for Ensuring Priority Vectors Reliability

Consistency and transitivity are important and leading research topics in the study of decision-making in terms of pairwise comparison matrices. In this paper, we search for conditions that, in case of inconsistency, guarantee ordinal compatibility between ordinal ranking (actual ranking) derived from a transitive matrix and cardinal rankings provided by the most usual priority vectors proposed in the scientific literature. We provide the notion of weak consistency; it is a condition weaker than consistency and stronger than transitivity and ensures that vectors associated with a matrix, by means of a strictly increasing synthesis functional, provide a preference order, on the related set of decision elements, equal to the actual ranking. This notion extends, to the case in which the decision-maker can be indifferent between two or more alternatives/criteria, weak consistency introduced in previous papers under constraint of no indifference. Finally, we introduce an order relation on the rows of the matrix, that is, a simple order if and only if weak consistency is satisfied; this simple order allows us to easily determine the actual ranking on the set of decision elements. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[4]  Rosaria de F. S. M. Russo,et al.  Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature , 2015, ITQM.

[5]  Massimo Squillante,et al.  About a consistency index for pairwise comparison matrices over a divisible alo‐group , 2012, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[6]  J. Barzilai.  Consistency Measures for Pairwise Comparison Matrices , 1998 .

[7]  T. Saaty.  Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[8]  Bice Cavallo,et al.  A further discussion of "A Semiring-based study of judgment matrices: properties and models" [Information Sciences 181 (2011) 2166-2176] , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Livia D’Apuzzo,et al.  Ranking and weak consistency in the A.H.P. context , 1997 .

[10]  Tetsuzo Tanino,et al.  Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making , 1988 .

[11]  Bice Cavallo,et al.  Deriving weights from a pairwise comparison matrix over an alo-group , 2011, Soft Computing.

[12]  John A. Keane,et al.  Contribution of individual judgments toward inconsistency in pairwise comparisons , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Making decisions in hierarchic and network systems , 2008, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci..

[14]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  M. T. Lamata,et al.  A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices , 2003 .

[16]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  Boundary properties of the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons in group decisions , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  J. Barzilai.  Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 1997 .

[18]  Luis G. Vargas.  An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications , 1990 .

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[20]  Gang Kou,et al.  Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: Adapting Hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The possibility of group choice: pairwise comparisons and merging functions , 2011, Social Choice and Welfare.

[22]  Yejun Xu,et al.  The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[23]  W. W. Koczkodaj.  A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons , 1993 .

[24]  Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira,et al.  Inconsistency and non-additive capacities: The Analytic Hierarchy Process in the framework of Choquet integration , 2013, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach , 2013, Oper. Res..

[26]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Some extensions of the precise consistency consensus matrix , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira,et al.  The binomial Gini inequality indices and the binomial decomposition of welfare functions , 2014, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[28]  Massimo Squillante,et al.  Generalized consistency and intensity vectors for comparison matrices , 2007, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[29]  Bice Cavallo,et al.  Reciprocal transitive matrices over abelian linearly ordered groups: Characterizations and application to multi-criteria decision problems , 2015, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  Livia D'Apuzzo,et al.  Weak Consistency and Quasi-Linear Means Imply the Actual Ranking , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..