Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths

This study develops a typology of decision paths through analysis of 47 recorded decisions. The sample included a wide variety of decisions made by a variety of groups. Recent research has questioned the traditional assumption that all normal groups follow a set, unitary sequence of decision stages. Instead, this research suggests groups may follow multiple sequences in making decisions. Some writers have gone so far as to deny the existence of phases and propose alternative nonphasic formulations. This study sought to generate descriptive data that could help define the range of alternative decision paths and their properties, in the hope that this could help select among the three perspectives on group decision development. The study developed new methods for mapping developmental sequences that made it possible to avoid one of the most troubling problems in prior research—the use of arbitrary time segments to define phases. The resulting typology had 11 different decision paths that fell into three main groups: unitary sequences, complex sequences, and solution-centered sequences. Analysis of this typology supported the multiple sequence model, but also suggested a role for normative unitary models. The study also found that most groups have significant periods of disorganized activity.

[1]  R. Bales,et al.  Phases in group problem-solving. , 1951, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[2]  Christoph M. Heinicke,et al.  Developmental Trends in the Structure of Small Groups , 1953 .

[3]  H. Landsberger,et al.  Interaction process analysis of the mediation of labor-management disputes. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  Thomas M. Scheidel,et al.  Idea development in small discussion groups , 1964 .

[5]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  R. Mann The Development of the Member-Trainer Relationship in Self-analytic Groups , 1966 .

[7]  D. M. Berg A descriptive analysis of the distribution and duration of themes discussed by task‐oriented, small groups , 1967 .

[8]  C. Morris,et al.  Changes in Group Interaction During Problem Solving , 1970 .

[9]  B. Aubrey Fisher,et al.  The Process of Decision Modification in Small Discussion Groups , 1970 .

[10]  B. Fisher,et al.  Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐making , 1970 .

[11]  J. Sorenson,et al.  Task Demands, Group Interaction and Group Performance' , 1971 .

[12]  Philip J. Runkel,et al.  Stages of Group Development: An Empirical Test of Tuckman's Hypothesis , 1971 .

[13]  E. Witte Field Research on Complex Decision-Making Processes – The Phase Theorem , 1972 .

[14]  B. Fisher,et al.  PHASES OF CONFLICT IN SMALL GROUP DEVELOPMENT: A MARKOV ANALYSIS , 1975 .

[15]  Edward A. Mabry,et al.  EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF A DEVELOPMENTAL MODEL FOR TASK‐ORIENTED SMALL GROUPS , 1975 .

[16]  R. Bales Interaction process analysis , 1976 .

[17]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[18]  D. Ellis Relational control in two group systems , 1979 .

[19]  B. Fisher Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process , 1980 .

[20]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  The Life Cycle of Groups: Group Developmental Stage Theory , 1981 .

[21]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models , 1981 .

[22]  U. Segal,et al.  The Cyclical Nature of Decision Making , 1982 .

[23]  The Value of Belonging to a Group in Japan , 1983 .

[24]  M. S. Poole Decision development in small groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision development. , 1983 .

[25]  Paul A. Anderson,et al.  Decision Making by Objection and the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1983 .

[26]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making 1 , 1983 .

[27]  J. Seeger No Innate Phases in Group Problem Solving , 1983 .

[28]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  PLANNING PROCESS ARCHETYPES AND THEIR EFFECTIVENESS , 1984 .

[29]  Kenneth N. Cissna Phases in Group Development , 1984 .

[30]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Innovation Complexity and the Sequence of Innovating Stages , 1985 .

[31]  Randy Hirokawa Discussion Procedures and Decision-Making Performance: A Test of a Functional Perspective. , 1985 .

[32]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[33]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups V: Test of a Contingency Model. , 1989 .