Road network structure and ride-sharing accessibility: A network science perspective

Abstract The prosperity of ride-sharing services has rippled in the communities of GIScience, transportation, and urban planning. Meanwhile, road network structure has been analyzed from a network science perspective that focuses on nodes and relational links and aims to predictive models. However, limited empirical studies have explored the relationship between road network structure and ride-sharing accessibility through such perspective. This paper utilizes the spatial Durbin model to understand the relationship between road network structure and ride-sharing accessibility, proxied by Uber accessibility, through classical network measures of degree, closeness, and betweenness centrality. Taking the city of Atlanta as a case study, we have found in addition to population density and road network density, larger values of degree centrality and smaller values of closeness centrality of the road network are associated with better accessibility of Uber services. However, the effects of betweenness centrality are not significant. Furthermore, we have revealed heterogeneous effects of degree centrality and closeness centrality on the accessibility of Uber services, as the magnitudes of their effects vary by different time windows (i.e., weekday vs. weekend, rush hour in the morning vs. evening). Network science provides us both conceptual and methodological measures to understand the association between road network structure and ride-sharing accessibility. In this study, we constructed road network structure measures with OpenStreetMap, which is reproducible, replicable, and scalable because of its global coverage and public availability. The study resonates with the notion of cities as the set of interactions across networks, as we have observed time-sensitive heterogeneous effects of road network structure on ride-sharing accessibility.

[1]  Erik Jenelius,et al.  Road network vulnerability analysis: Conceptualization, implementation and application , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  Dennis R. Livesay,et al.  How accurate and statistically robust are catalytic site predictions based on closeness centrality? , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Kazushi Sano,et al.  Explaining Traffic Flow Patterns Using Centrality Measures , 2015 .

[4]  Geoff Boeing,et al.  Planarity and street network representation in urban form analysis , 2018, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.

[5]  Ryan C. Hughes,et al.  Transportation network company wait times in Greater Seattle, and relationship to socioeconomic indicators , 2016 .

[6]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[7]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Patrick Weber,et al.  OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[9]  David J Giacomin,et al.  Road network circuity in metropolitan areas , 2015 .

[10]  Clio Andris,et al.  Challenges for social flows , 2018, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[11]  E. Jenelius.  Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability , 2009 .

[12]  V. Latora,et al.  Centrality in networks of urban streets. , 2006, Chaos.

[13]  Michael Batty,et al.  Cities as Flows, Cities of Flows , 2011 .

[14]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Self-organization versus top-down planning in the evolution of a city , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Geoff Boeing,et al.  OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks , 2016, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[16]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[17]  V. Latora,et al.  Centrality measures in spatial networks of urban streets. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Mingshu Wang,et al.  From stay to play – A travel planning tool based on crowdsourcing user-generated contents , 2017 .

[19]  M. Goodchild.  GIScience, Geography, Form, and Process , 2004 .

[20]  M. Barthelemy.  Betweenness centrality in large complex networks , 2003, cond-mat/0309436.

[21]  Michael Batty,et al.  How disruptive is the smart cities movement? , 2016 .

[22]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[23]  V. Latora,et al.  Street Centrality and Densities of Retail and Services in Bologna, Italy , 2009 .

[24]  S. Porta,et al.  Street centrality and land use intensity in Baton Rouge, Louisiana , 2011 .

[25]  S. Gorman,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake , 2010 .

[26]  Dipto Sarkar,et al.  Metrics for characterizing network structure and node importance in Spatial Social Networks , 2019, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[28]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Freimut Bodendorf,et al.  Detecting opinion leaders and trends in online social networks , 2009, CIKM-SWSM.

[30]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[31]  Mingshu Wang,et al.  Spatial disparities of Uber accessibility: An exploratory analysis in Atlanta, USA , 2018, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[32]  Yong Gao,et al.  Understanding Urban Traffic-Flow Characteristics: A Rethinking of Betweenness Centrality , 2013 .

[33]  D. Sui,et al.  Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities , 2018, Cities.

[34]  David O’Sullivan,et al.  Spatial Network Analysis , 2021, Handbook of Regional Science.

[35]  Rosanna Smart,et al.  Faster and Cheaper: How Ride-Sourcing Fills a Gap in Low-Income Los Angeles Neighborhoods , 2015 .

[36]  J. Paul Elhorst,et al.  Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar , 2010 .

[37]  D. Sui,et al.  Uber, Public Transit, and Urban Transportation Equity: A Case Study in New York City , 2019, The Professional Geographer.

[38]  Taylor Shelton,et al.  The Nature of Neighborhoods: Using Big Data to Rethink the Geographies of Atlanta’s Neighborhood Planning Unit System , 2019, Annals of the American Association of Geographers.