CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Emergent Processes in Group Behavior

Just as neurons interconnect in networks that create structured thoughts beyond the ken of any individual neuron, so people spontaneously organize themselves into groups to create emergent organizations that no individual may intend, comprehend, or even perceive. Recent technological advances have provided us with unprecedented opportunities for conducting controlled laboratory experiments on human collective behavior. We describe two experimental paradigms in which we attempt to build predictive bridges between the beliefs, goals, and cognitive capacities of individuals and patterns of behavior at the group level, showing how the members of a group dynamically allocate themselves to resources and how innovations diffuse through a social network. Agent-based computational models have provided useful explanatory and predictive accounts. Together, the models and experiments point to tradeoffs between exploration and exploitation—that is, compromises between individuals using their own innovations and using innovations obtained from their peers—and the emergence of group-level organizations such as population waves, bandwagon effects, and spontaneous specialization.

[1]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Propagation of innovations in networked groups. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[3]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  EPICURE: Spatial and Knowledge Limitations in Group Foraging , 2006, Adapt. Behav..

[4]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Self-organized trail systems in groups of humans , 2006, Complex..

[5]  D. Medin,et al.  The cultural mind: environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. , 2005, Psychological review.

[6]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Computational models of collective behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Knowledge of resources and competitors in human foraging , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .

[9]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Human foraging behavior in a virtual environment , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  P. Richerson,et al.  Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. , 2004 .

[11]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[12]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[13]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[14]  W. Baum,et al.  Group choice: competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution. , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. Gray,et al.  Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution , 1993 .

[17]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Sperm whalers off the Galápagos Islands and in the Western North Pacific, 1830–1850: Ideal free whalers? , 1991 .

[18]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .