We investigated students' initial and final understanding of acid-base concepts and their concurrent thought processes and actions during the process of acid-base titrations. Here we report students' actions and thought processes while titrating. Different levels of information were presented by three technologies: chemical indicators, pH meters, and microcomputer-based laboratories. We speculated that the level of information would influence students' actions and thought processes, as expressed in verbal commentary. Data were collected from 14 secondary chemistry students. Each student used one technology to titrate a strong acid, a weak acid, and a polyprotic acid with a strong base. They verbalized their thoughts while titrating. Students then graphed pH versus volume of base and discussed the titration with the investigator. Verbal commentaries were coded and analyzed for patterns in actions and for frequency of statement categories. Drawings were analyzed for shape, scale, and direction; discussions were analyzed for understanding of acid-base neutralization. We found that the technology's level of information affected the focus of students' observations. The microcomputer group focused primarily on the graph; other groups exhibited multiple foci. We speculate the screen display functions as an auxiliary short-term memory. The discussion data also reveal that students held three main ideas about how acids and bases behave when mixed. Implications for instruction are discussed.
[1]
Heather Brasell,et al.
The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity
,
1987
.
[2]
K. A. Ericsson,et al.
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
,
1984
.
[3]
R. Tinker,et al.
Microcomputers in the teaching lab
,
1981
.
[4]
Ronald K. Thornton,et al.
Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools
,
1990
.
[5]
Joseph Krajcik,et al.
A Research Strategy for the Dynamic Study of Students' Concepts and Problem Solving Strategies Using Science Software.
,
1988
.
[6]
J. Mokros,et al.
The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs
,
1987
.
[7]
M. Wittrock.
Learning as a Generative Process
,
1974
.
[8]
R. Osborne,et al.
Learning in science : the implications of children's science
,
1985
.
[9]
R. Osborne,et al.
Learning science: A generative process
,
1983
.
[10]
Vincent N. Lunetta.
Evaluating Science Laboratory Skills.
,
1981
.
[11]
M. C. Wittrock,et al.
The Cognitive Movement in Instruction
,
1979
.
[12]
Jill H. Larkin,et al.
Cognition of learning physics
,
1981
.