Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures

In two studies, a newly devised test (framed-line test) was used to examine the hypothesis that individuals engaging in Asian cultures are more capable of incorporating contextual information and those engaging in North American cultures are more capable of ignoring contextual information. On each trial, participants were presented with a square frame, within which was printed a vertical line. Participants were then shown another square frame of the same or different size and asked to draw a line that was identical to the first line in either absolute length (absolute task) or proportion to the height of the surrounding frame (relative task). The results supported the hypothesis: Whereas Japanese were more accurate in the relative task, Americans were more accurate in the absolute task. Moreover, when engaging in another culture, individuals tended to show the cognitive characteristic common in the host culture.

[1]  J. Bruner,et al.  Value and need as organizing factors in perception. , 1947, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  L. Postman,et al.  Is there a mechanism of perceptual defense? , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[4]  M. Erdelyi.  A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. , 1974, Psychological review.

[5]  John W. Berry,et al.  Psychological Differentiation in Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1975 .

[6]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[7]  Ivy Yee-Man Lau,et al.  The Linguistic Relativity of Person Cognition: An English-Chinese Comparison , 1986 .

[8]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[9]  S. Fiske.  Social cognition and social perception. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  J. Bruner.  The View from the Heart's Eye: A Commentary , 1994 .

[11]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[12]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention. , 1994 .

[13]  H. Markus,et al.  Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  S. Cross,et al.  Models of the self: self-construals and gender. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Cultural Variations in Cognition: Implications for Aging Research , 2000 .

[16]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Running Head: CULTURE AND THOUGHT Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic vs. Analytic Cognition , 2001 .

[18]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[19]  R. Nisbett,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans , 2004 .

[20]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Culture and basic psychological processes--toward a system view of culture: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Word and voice: Spontaneous attention to emotional utterances in two languages , 2002 .

[22]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Cultural variation in correspondence bias: the critical role of attitude diagnosticity of socially constrained behavior. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Spontaneous Attention to Word Content Versus Emotional Tone , 2003, Psychological science.