Wind energy: Influencing the dynamics of the public opinion formation through the retweet network
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jörg Matthes,et al. From social media diet to public riot? Engagement with "greenfluencers" and young social media users' environmental activism , 2022, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[2] W. Neumann,et al. Is large-scale wind power a problem, solution, or victim? A frame analysis of the debate in Swedish media , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.
[3] D. Keles,et al. Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[4] P. Vellucci,et al. Contrarian effect in opinion forming: Insights from Greta Thunberg phenomenon , 2021, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology.
[5] V. Mansotra,et al. Predicting Geolocation of Tweets: Using Combination of CNN and BiLSTM , 2021, Data Science and Engineering.
[6] Seung-Pyo Jun,et al. The impact of the pandemic declaration on public awareness and behavior: Focusing on COVID-19 google searches , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[7] Hassan Sajjad,et al. Are We Ready for this Disaster? Towards Location Mention Recognition from Crisis Tweets , 2020, COLING.
[8] M. Hekkert,et al. Low-carbon lock-in? Exploring transformative innovation policy and offshore wind energy pathways in the Netherlands , 2020 .
[9] Julian V. Lamy,et al. Keep wind projects close? A case study of distance, culture, and cost in offshore and onshore wind energy siting , 2020 .
[10] Guangqing Chi,et al. Energy choices in Alaska: Mining people's perception and attitudes from geotagged tweets , 2020 .
[11] Emmanuel Mogaji,et al. Examining consumer behaviour in the UK Energy sector through the sentimental and thematic analysis of tweets , 2020 .
[12] K. Borch,et al. Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance , 2020 .
[13] Nathalie Dällenbach,et al. Individual or collective? Community investment, local taxes, and the social acceptance of wind energy in Switzerland , 2019 .
[14] Maurizio Naldi,et al. Predicting the performance of TV series through textual and network analysis: The case of Big Bang Theory , 2019, PloS one.
[15] Johannes Pohl,et al. Attitudes of U.S. Wind Turbine Neighbors: Analysis of a Nationwide Survey , 2019, Energy Policy.
[16] Asma Dhakouani,et al. Impacts of energy efficiency policies on the integration of renewable energy , 2019, Energy Policy.
[17] L. Zou,et al. Beyond big data: Social media challenges and opportunities for understanding social perception of energy , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.
[18] Angelo Corallo,et al. Influence parameters correlation in a Twitter event network , 2019, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business.
[19] Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al. Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes – Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[20] Rodrigo Patiño,et al. Justice, social exclusion and indigenous opposition: A case study of wind energy development on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.
[21] Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al. Renewable energies: Worldwide trends in research, funding and international collaboration , 2019, Renewable Energy.
[22] Maurizio Naldi,et al. Interactions and Sentiment in Personal Finance Forums: An Exploratory Analysis , 2019, Inf..
[23] Jacob Ladenburg,et al. Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.
[24] Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani,et al. Macroscopic Noisy Bounded Confidence Models With Distributed Radical Opinions , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.
[25] Jorge David Gonzalez Paule,et al. On fine-grained geolocalisation of tweets and real-time traffic incident detection , 2019, Inf. Process. Manag..
[26] Loretta Mastroeni,et al. Agent-Based Models for Opinion Formation: A Bibliographic Survey , 2019, IEEE Access.
[27] Kwan Hui Lim,et al. Geotagging tweets to landmarks using convolutional neural networks with text and posting time , 2019, IUI Companion.
[28] Vanita Jain,et al. Sentiment classification of twitter data belonging to renewable energy using machine learning , 2019, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences.
[29] Ee-Peng Lim,et al. Fine-grained Geolocation of Tweets in Temporal Proximity , 2019, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..
[30] David Bidwell,et al. Chains of trust: Energy justice, public engagement, and the first offshore wind farm in the United States , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.
[31] K. Borch. Mapping value perspectives on wind power projects: The case of the danish test centre for large wind turbines , 2018, Energy Policy.
[32] Ji-Bum Chung,et al. Korean traditional beliefs and renewable energy transitions: Pungsu, shamanism, and the local perception of wind turbines , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.
[33] Nicholas A. Giudice,et al. Seeing clearly in a virtual reality: Tourist reactions to an offshore wind project , 2018, Energy Policy.
[34] Nina Hampl,et al. Worldviews as predictors of wind and solar energy support in Austria: Bridging social acceptance and risk perception research , 2018 .
[35] Meryl P. Gardner,et al. Wind in the sails or choppy seas?: People-place relations, aesthetics and public support for the United States’ first offshore wind project , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.
[36] Ee-Peng Lim,et al. Exploiting User and Venue Characteristics for Fine-Grained Tweet Geolocation , 2018, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..
[37] A. Jesus,et al. Eco-Innovation in the transition to a circular economy: an analytical literature review , 2018 .
[38] Johannes Pohl,et al. Reconsidering barriers to wind power projects: community engagement, developer transparency and place , 2017 .
[39] Klaus Menrad,et al. Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: Which form of participation is the key to acceptance? , 2017 .
[40] Joemon M. Jose,et al. On Fine-Grained Geolocalisation of Tweets , 2017, ICTIR.
[41] İlker Türker,et al. A multilayer network analysis of hashtags in twitter via co-occurrence and semantic links , 2017 .
[42] Inês L. Azevedo,et al. Perceptions of wind energy projects in two coastal Massachusetts communities , 2017 .
[43] Joseph Rand,et al. Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned? , 2017 .
[44] Chad Walker,et al. Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes , 2017 .
[45] Anahita A. N. Jami,et al. From consultation to collaboration: A participatory framework for positive community engagement with wind energy projects in Ontario, Canada , 2017 .
[46] Kathleen M. Carley,et al. On Predicting Geolocation of Tweets Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2017, SBP-BRiMS.
[47] I. Papazu. Nearshore Wind Resistance on Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island: Not Another NIMBY Story , 2017 .
[48] Rong Wang,et al. Hashtags and information virality in networked social movement: Examining hashtag co-occurrence patterns , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..
[49] Kajsa E. Dalrymple,et al. Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation on Twitter , 2016 .
[50] J. Barnett,et al. Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public , 2016 .
[51] Sufang Zhang,et al. The effectiveness of China's wind power policy: An empirical analysis , 2016 .
[52] Lorenzo Pareschi,et al. Kinetic models of collective decision-making in the presence of equality bias , 2016, 1606.05674.
[53] Vicente Carabias-Hütter,et al. Future acceptance of wind energy production : exploring future local acceptance of wind energy production in a Swiss alpine region , 2015 .
[54] Sheung Yin Kevin Mo,et al. Twitter financial community sentiment and its predictive relationship to stock market movement , 2015 .
[55] Fabián Riquelme,et al. Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..
[56] Alexey S. Matveev,et al. Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks With Hostile Camps: Consensus vs. Polarization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.
[57] Yang Liu,et al. Who Influenced You? Predicting Retweet via Social Influence Locality , 2015, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data.
[58] Bohumil Frantál. Have Local Government and Public Expectations of Wind Energy Project Benefits Been Met? Implications for Repowering Schemes , 2015 .
[59] Yvonne Rydin,et al. Public Engagement in Decision-Making on Major Wind Energy Projects , 2015 .
[60] Götz Walter,et al. Determining the local acceptance of wind energy projects in Switzerland: The importance of general attitudes and project characteristics , 2014 .
[61] Kristina Ek,et al. Wind farms — Where and how to place them? A choice experiment approach to measure consumer preferences for characteristics of wind farm establishments in Sweden , 2014 .
[62] Luis M. Abadie,et al. Valuation of Wind Energy Projects: A Real Options Approach , 2014 .
[63] Ioannis Anagnostopoulos,et al. InfluenceTracker: Rating the impact of a Twitter account , 2014, AIAI Workshops.
[64] Puneet Dwivedi,et al. Diffusion of non-traditional cookstoves across western Honduras: A social network analysis , 2014 .
[65] Chris Hankin,et al. Ranking Twitter Influence by Combining Network Centrality and Influence Observables in an Evolutionary Model , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems.
[66] William F. Gale,et al. Harnessing social networks for promoting adoption of energy technologies in the domestic sector , 2013 .
[67] Scott A. Hale,et al. Where in the World Are You? Geolocation and Language Identification in Twitter* , 2013, ArXiv.
[68] Xiaohui Yan,et al. A biterm topic model for short texts , 2013, WWW.
[69] Jia Yan,et al. Mining topical influencers based on the multi-relational network in micro-blogging sites , 2013, China Communications.
[70] D. Shipworth,et al. The value of social networks in the diffusion of energy-efficiency innovations in UK households , 2013 .
[71] D. Bell,et al. Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy , 2013 .
[72] Sébastien Motsch,et al. Heterophilious Dynamics Enhances Consensus , 2013, SIAM Rev..
[73] Alessandro Vespignani,et al. The Twitter of Babel: Mapping World Languages through Microblogging Platforms , 2012, PloS one.
[74] W. Kempton,et al. Public acceptance of offshore wind power: does perceived fairness of process matter? , 2012 .
[75] Geraint Ellis,et al. Large‐scale wind deployment, social acceptance , 2012 .
[76] Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al. Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity , 2012 .
[77] Michael C. Slattery,et al. The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the U.S. Great Plains , 2012 .
[78] L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al. Role of social interactions in dynamic patterns of resource patches and forager aggregation , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[79] Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis,et al. A review of the environmental and human impacts from wind parks. A case study for the Prefecture of Lasithi, Crete , 2012 .
[80] Xiaojing Sun,et al. The current state of offshore wind energy technology development , 2012 .
[81] Les Carr,et al. Identifying communicator roles in twitter , 2012, WWW.
[82] Marián Simko,et al. Leveraging Microblogs for Resource Ranking , 2012, SOFSEM.
[83] Stefan Stieglitz,et al. Political Communication and Influence through Microblogging--An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[84] Tony White,et al. Modelling Influence in a Social Network: Metrics and Evaluation , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.
[85] Isabel Anger,et al. Measuring influence on Twitter , 2011, i-KNOW '11.
[86] Duncan J. Watts,et al. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.
[87] Scott Counts,et al. Identifying topical authorities in microblogs , 2011, WSDM '11.
[88] Shyhtsun Felix Wu,et al. Measuring message propagation and social influence on Twitter.com , 2010, Int. J. Commun. Networks Distributed Syst..
[89] Mhairi Aitken,et al. Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities , 2010 .
[90] I. Couzin,et al. Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[91] Daniel M. Romero,et al. Influence and passivity in social media , 2010, ECML/PKDD.
[92] Christopher R. Jones,et al. Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? , 2010 .
[93] Krishna P. Gummadi,et al. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.
[94] M. Slattery,et al. Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making , 2010 .
[95] Charles R. Warren,et al. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .
[96] Jacob Ladenburg,et al. Attitudes towards offshore wind farms--The role of beach visits on attitude and demographic and attitude relations , 2010 .
[97] Stefania Bandini,et al. Agent Based Modeling and Simulation: An Informatics Perspective , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..
[98] Janet Stephenson,et al. Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand , 2009 .
[99] J. Martínez-Alier,et al. The Politics of Landscape Value: A Case Study of Wind Farm Conflict in Rural Catalonia , 2009 .
[100] J. Stephens,et al. Wind Energy in US Media: A Comparative State-Level Analysis of a Critical Climate Change Mitigation Technology , 2009 .
[101] Jacob Ladenburg,et al. PREFERENCES OF COASTAL ZONE USER GROUPS REGARDING THE SITING OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS , 2009 .
[102] Andreas Kontoleon,et al. Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: A choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands , 2009 .
[103] Jacob Ladenburg,et al. Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience , 2009 .
[104] Jeremy Firestone,et al. Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA , 2009 .
[105] Guillaume Moreau,et al. An immersive path-based study of wind turbines' landscape: A French case in Plouguin , 2009 .
[106] Edgar G. Hertwich,et al. Life cycle assessment of a floating offshore wind turbine , 2009 .
[107] Maria Johansson,et al. Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception , 2007 .
[108] Maarten Wolsink,et al. Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .
[109] D. Horst. NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .
[110] Alain Nadaï,et al. “Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case , 2007 .
[111] C. Gross,et al. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .
[112] Ian D. Bishop,et al. Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: The influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables , 2007 .
[113] W. Kempton,et al. Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .
[114] Jure Leskovec,et al. Patterns of Influence in a Recommendation Network , 2006, PAKDD.
[115] Kristina Ek. Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power , 2005 .
[116] D. Bell,et al. The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .
[117] David Toke,et al. Explaining wind power planning outcomes:: some findings from a study in England and Wales , 2005 .
[118] Jon Kleinberg,et al. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.
[119] David Toke,et al. Wind Power in UK and Denmark: Can Rational Choice Help Explain Different Outcomes? , 2002 .
[120] Atul K. Jain,et al. Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate , 2008 .
[121] Maarten Wolsink,et al. Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .
[122] T. Vicsek,et al. Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.
[123] F. Liébana-Cabanillas,et al. A mixed analysis of perceptions of electric and hybrid vehicles , 2020 .
[124] David Rudolph,et al. (Dis)Embedding the Wind – on People-Climate Reconciliation in Danish Wind Power Planning , 2019 .
[125] Loretta Mastroeni,et al. Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems Under Proportional Updating and Any-to-Any Influence , 2019, AIRO Springer Series.
[126] Johannes Pohl,et al. Monitoring annoyance and stress effects of wind turbines on nearby residents: A comparison of U.S. and European samples. , 2019, Environment international.
[127] El Habib Nfaoui,et al. Using Tweets Embeddings For Hashtag Recommendation in Twitter , 2018 .
[128] Fausto Pedro García Márquez,et al. Wind Energy Power Prospective , 2018 .
[129] Johannes Pohl,et al. Understanding stress effects of wind turbine noise – The integrated approach , 2018 .
[130] B. Slee. Is there a case for community-based equity participation in Scottish on-shore wind energy production? Gaps in evidence and research needs , 2015 .
[131] Lin Wang,et al. Distributed Attitude Control of Multi-Agent Formations , 2011 .
[132] Thomas R. Allen,et al. Wind turbines and coastal recreation demand , 2010 .
[133] Jacob Ladenburg,et al. Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy , 2008 .