Synchronization of coupled biological oscillators under spatially heterogeneous environmental forcing.

Spatially heterogeneous intensities of environmental signals are common in nature, being caused, e.g., by rugged or curved surfaces leading to varying angles of incidence and intensities. In this work, we perform numerical studies of one-dimensional arrays of coupled phase oscillators driven by a periodic signal with spatially heterogeneous amplitude, considering both random and gradual amplitude distributions of the driving. We compare the effects of global and next-neighbor interactions, respectively, on the mutual and forced synchronization in the array. Weak global coupling leads to full mutual synchronization for all studied driving configurations. The degree of external synchronization follows a majority rule, depending on the number of externally entrained oscillators in the uncoupled case. The effects of next-neighbor coupling depend on the spatial distribution of the driving amplitude. For random distributions, local interactions show the same qualitative effects as global coupling. In contrast, for gradual distributions and large driving heterogeneities, next-neighbor coupling is detrimental to both mutual and external synchronization. We discuss these observations with respect to fundamental aspects of heterogeneity and variability of dynamical systems, as well as the intercellular synchronization of circadian oscillators.

[1]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of dispersal , 1999 .

[2]  U. Rascher,et al.  High-resolution chlorophyll fluorescence imaging serves as a non-invasive indicator to monitor the spatio-temporal variations of metabolism during the day-night cycle and during the endogenous rhythm in continuous light in the CAM-plant Kalanchoe daigremontiana , 2002 .

[3]  Andrew J. Millar,et al.  Biological rhythms and photoperiodism in plants , 1998 .

[4]  M. Hütt,et al.  Spatiotemporal variation of metabolism in a plant circadian rhythm: The biological clock as an assembly of coupled individual oscillators , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Arenas,et al.  Exact long-time behavior of a network of phase oscillators under random fields. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  V. Hutson,et al.  The evolution of dispersal rates in a heterogeneous time-periodic environment , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.

[7]  Juan P. Torres,et al.  The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena , 2005 .

[8]  Hidetsugu Sakaguchi,et al.  Cooperative Phenomena in Coupled Oscillator Systems under External Fields , 1988 .

[9]  S. Honma,et al.  MULTIPLE OSCILLATORS IN THE SUPRACHIASMATIC NUCLEUS , 2001, Chronobiology international.

[10]  A. Hall,et al.  Functional independence of circadian clocks that regulate plant gene expression , 2000, Current Biology.

[11]  F. Kaiser,et al.  Lateral diffusion of CO2 in leaves of the crassulacean acid metabolism plant Kalanchoë daigremontiana Hamet et Perrier , 2005, Planta.

[12]  M. Merrow,et al.  The Network of Time: Understanding the Molecular Circadian System , 2003, Current Biology.

[13]  J. M. Sancho,et al.  WAVE PROPAGATION IN A MEDIUM WITH DISORDERED EXCITABILITY , 1998 .

[14]  L. Nedbal,et al.  Complex metabolic oscillations in plants forced by harmonic irradiance. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Ralf Wessel,et al.  Synchronization from disordered driving forces in arrays of coupled oscillators. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[16]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence , 1984, Springer Series in Synergetics.

[17]  S. Yamaguchi,et al.  Synchronization of Cellular Clocks in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus , 2003, Science.

[18]  S. Kai,et al.  Circadian rhythm formation in plant seedling: global synchronization and bifurcation as a coupled nonlinear oscillator system. , 2004, Bio Systems.

[19]  S. Bernard,et al.  Spontaneous synchronization of coupled circadian oscillators. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Erik Glatt,et al.  Variability-induced transition in a net of neural elements: From oscillatory to excitable behavior. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[22]  M. Moser,et al.  Why Life Oscillates – from a Topographical Towards a Functional Chronobiology , 2006, Cancer Causes & Control.

[23]  P. McClintock Phase resetting in medicine and biology , 2008 .

[24]  J. Kurths,et al.  Array-Enhanced Coherence Resonance , 2001 .

[25]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Biological Clocks Coordinately Keep Life on Time , 2005, Science.

[26]  Chris Arney Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order , 2007 .

[27]  J. Kurths,et al.  Array-enhanced coherence resonance: nontrivial effects of heterogeneity and spatial independence of noise. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[28]  A. Arenas,et al.  Synchronization processes in complex networks , 2006, nlin/0610057.

[29]  J. W. Hastings,et al.  Circadian communication between unicells? , 1986, Cell Biophysics.

[30]  R. Kapral,et al.  Resonantly forced inhomogeneous reaction-diffusion systems. , 2000, Chaos.

[31]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Spatiotemporal coherence resonance of phase synchronization in weakly coupled chaotic oscillators. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Physiology. Biological clocks coordinately keep life on time. , 2005, Science.

[33]  Kenzo Hirose,et al.  Intercellular coupling mechanism for synchronized and noise-resistant circadian oscillators. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Shigeru Shinomoto,et al.  Local and Grobal Self-Entrainments in Oscillator Lattices , 1987 .