Nature-Inspired Self-Powered Sensors and Energy Harvesters

Chapter 3 presents a comprehensive review of the various biomimetic self-powered and low-powered MEMS pressure and flow sensors that take inspiration from the biological flow sensors found in the marine world. The sensing performance of the biological flow sensors in marine animals has inspired engineers and scientists to develop efficient state-of-the-art sensors for a variety of real-life applications. In an attempt to achieve high-performance artificial flow sensors, researchers have mimicked the morphology, sensing principle, materials, and functionality of the biological sensors. Inspiration was derived from the survival hydrodynamics featured by various marine animals to develop sensors for sensing tasks in underwater vehicles. The mechanoreceptors of crocodiles have inspired the development of slowly and rapidly adapting MEMS sensory domes for passive underwater sensing. Likewise, the lateral line sensing system in fishes which is capable of generating a three-dimensional map of the surroundings was mimicked to achieve artificial hydrodynamic vision on underwater vehicles. Harbor seals are known to achieve high sensitivity in sensing flows within the wake street of a swimming fish due to the undulatory geometry of the whiskers. Whisker inspired structures were embedded into MEMS sensing membranes to understand their vortex shedding behavior. At the outset, this work comprehensively reviews the sensing mechanisms observed in fishes, crocodiles, and harbor seals. In addition, this chapter presents an in-depth commentary on the recent developments in this area where different researchers have taken inspiration from these aforementioned underwater creatures and developed some of the most efficient artificial sensing systems.

[1]  D. Soares,et al.  Neurology: An ancient sensory organ in crocodilians , 2002, Nature.

[2]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Distant touch hydrodynamic imaging with an artificial lateral line , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  K. Yanase,et al.  Unsteady turbulent boundary layers in swimming rainbow trout , 2015, The Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  William C Eberhardt,et al.  Development of an artificial sensor for hydrodynamic detection inspired by a seal’s whisker array , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[5]  Nan Wang,et al.  Crocodile-inspired dome-shaped pressure receptors for passive hydrodynamic sensing , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[6]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Performance analysis and characterization of bio-inspired whisker sensors for underwater applications , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  M. Appleby,et al.  A bio-inspired artificial whisker for fluid motion sensing with increased sensitivity and reliability , 2011, 2011 IEEE SENSORS Proceedings.

[8]  S. Coombs,et al.  Biologically inspired design of hydrogel-capped hair sensors for enhanced underwater flow detection , 2009 .

[9]  Pablo Valdivia y Alvarado,et al.  Design of a bio-inspired whisker sensor for underwater applications , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sensors.

[10]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The influence of viscous hydrodynamics on the fish lateral-line system. , 2009, Integrative and comparative biology.

[11]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Hydrodynamic Trail-Following in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina) , 2001, Science.

[12]  D. Reneker,et al.  Hydrogel microstructures combined with electrospun fibers and photopatterning for shape and modulus control , 2008 .

[13]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  The Hydrodynamics and Structural Mechanics of the Lateral Line System , 2006 .

[14]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Biology of the mechanosensory lateral line in fishes , 1995, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[15]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part I: open water and heading towards a wall , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  A. Kottapalli,et al.  Nanofibril scaffold assisted MEMS artificial hydrogel neuromasts for enhanced sensitivity flow sensing , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  J. Engel,et al.  Design and Characterization of Artificial Haircell Sensor for Flow Sensing With Ultrahigh Velocity and Angular Sensitivity , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[18]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish , 1997, Nature.

[19]  Yi Liu,et al.  Vortex-induced vibration measurements of seal whiskers using digital holography , 2014, OCEANS 2014 - TAIPEI.

[20]  Junliang Tao,et al.  Hair flow sensors: from bio-inspiration to bio-mimicking—a review , 2012 .

[21]  A. Kottapalli,et al.  Artificial fish skin of self-powered micro-electromechanical systems hair cells for sensing hydrodynamic flow phenomena , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  S. Dijkgraaf THE FUNCTIONING and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LATERAL‐LINE ORGANS , 1963, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[23]  Sajad Saeedi,et al.  AUV Navigation and Localization: A Review , 2014, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[24]  C. Williamson,et al.  Vortex-Induced Vibrations , 2004, Wind Effects on Structures.

[25]  Frederike D. Hanke,et al.  Harbor seal vibrissa morphology suppresses vortex-induced vibrations , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Nannan Chen,et al.  Hydrogel‐Encapsulated Microfabricated Haircells Mimicking Fish Cupula Neuromast , 2007 .

[27]  A. Kottapalli,et al.  Fish-inspired self-powered microelectromechanical flow sensor with biomimetic hydrogel cupula , 2017 .

[28]  A. G. P. Kottapalli,et al.  Harbor seal inspired MEMS artificial micro-whisker sensor , 2014, 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

[29]  A. G. P. Kottapalli,et al.  Harbor seal whisker inspired flow sensors to reduce vortex-induced vibrations , 2015, 2015 28th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

[30]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part II: gliding parallel to a wall , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  Kenneth C. Catania,et al.  Structure, innervation and response properties of integumentary sensory organs in crocodilians , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Disrupted flow sensing impairs hydrodynamic performance and increases the metabolic cost of swimming in the yellowtail kingfish, Seriola lalandi , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Seal whiskers detect water movements , 1998, Nature.

[34]  Laurens E Howle,et al.  Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals. , 2008, Integrative and comparative biology.

[35]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Wake-induced ‘slaloming’ response explains exquisite sensitivity of seal whisker-like sensors , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Biomimetic survival hydrodynamics and flow sensing , 2015 .

[37]  B.H. Calhoun,et al.  A capacitance-based whisker-like artificial sensor for fluid motion sensing , 2010, 2010 IEEE Sensors.

[38]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Soft polymer membrane micro-sensor arrays inspired by the mechanosensory lateral line on the blind cavefish , 2015 .

[39]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Smart Skins: Information Processing by Lateral Line Flow Sensors , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[40]  Ajay Giri Prakash Kottapalli,et al.  Sensing the flow beneath the fins , 2018, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[41]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The Mechanosensory Lateral Line System of the Hypogean form of Astyanax Fasciatus , 2001, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[42]  Kyle D. Anderson,et al.  Bioinspired Material Approaches to Sensing , 2009 .

[43]  J. Boucher,et al.  How much fish is hidden in the surface and bottom acoustic blind zones , 2009 .