Pheromone communication in ants: a detailed analysis of concentration-dependent decisions in three species

The collective behavior of ants and the emergence of self-organizing patterns in ant colonies have been explained with various theoretical approaches based on models of trail following behavior elicited by pheromones. Although existing models can explain collective behavior of ants, there is little empirical evidence on how ants precisely respond to various pheromone concentrations. Thus, important knowledge is lacking about how much realistic description of ant behavior can be provided by the models and their underlying mathematical functions. To fill in this gap, we conducted experiments with three different ant species to explore their responses to varying concentrations of pheromones that elicit ants’ trail following behavior. We found that ants’ decision making processes in trail following are best explained by psychophysical theory (PT), which describes the relationship between physical stimuli, sensory perception and decision making in humans, other primates, birds and insects. Furthermore, the theory provides clear definitions of biological parameters, such as detection- and discrimination thresholds. The species studied were distinctively different in the shape and parameters of their psychometric functions, which we attribute to specific adaptions to their environment. The observed differences are discussed in relation to their natural trail following behaviors. Our study opens a new perspective of understanding and explaining important aspects of collective ant behavior using a well-established theory of perception.

[1]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[2]  B. Seifert Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas , 2007 .

[3]  E. Wilson,et al.  Glandular Sources and Specificity of Some Chemical Releasers of Social Behavior in Dolichoderine Ants , 1959 .

[4]  N. Davies,et al.  Characterization of aggregation factors and associated compounds from the argentine ant,Iridomyrmex humilis , 1980, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[5]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[8]  Relational Psychophysics in Humans and Animals: A Comparative-Developmental Approach , 2006 .

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  N. Tsutsui,et al.  Trail Pheromone of the Argentine Ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Recruitment in starved nests: the role of direct and indirect interactions between scouts and nestmates in the ant Lasius niger , 2011, Insectes Sociaux.

[14]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[16]  P.-P. Grasse La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chezBellicositermes natalensis etCubitermes sp. la théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs , 1959, Insectes Sociaux.

[17]  E. Wilson Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith) 1. The Organization of Mass-Foraging , 1962 .

[18]  L. Keller,et al.  Evolution of supercolonies: The Argentine ants of southern Europe , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  U. Maschwitz,et al.  Mushroom harvesting ants in the tropical rain forest , 2008, Naturwissenschaften.

[20]  S. Key,et al.  Trail-following responses of the Argentine ant,Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr), to a synthetic trail pheromone component and analogs , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[21]  P. L. Robertson,et al.  Exocrine gland involvement in trailing behaviour in the Argentine ant (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  N. Davies,et al.  An Argentine ant aggregation factor , 1979, Experientia.

[23]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Synergy between social and private information increases foraging efficiency in ants , 2011, Biology Letters.

[24]  Ernst Heinrich Weber,et al.  De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae , 1834 .

[25]  W. Hangartner Orientierung vonLasius fuliginosus Latr. an einer Gabelung der Geruchsspur , 1969, Insectes Sociaux.

[26]  K. Akre,et al.  Psychophysics and the evolution of behavior. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  A. Turing The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[28]  J. Spaethe,et al.  Comparative psychophysics of bumblebee and honeybee colour discrimination and object detection , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  J. Pasteels,et al.  Caste differences in behavioral thresholds as a basis for polyethism during food recruitment in the ant,Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae) , 1991, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[30]  A Kacelnik,et al.  Risky choice and Weber's Law. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Individual Rules for Trail Pattern Formation in Argentine Ants (Linepithema humile) , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant , 1989, Naturwissenschaften.

[33]  J. Velázquez,et al.  Ant foraging and geodesic paths in labyrinths: analytical and computational results. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Memory and chemical communication in the orientation of two mass-recruiting ant species , 1993, Insectes Sociaux.

[35]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[36]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  The chemistry of social regulation: multicomponent signals in ant societies. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  H. Bestmann,et al.  3,4‐Dihydroisocoumarins, a New Class of Ant Trail Pheromones , 1992 .

[38]  J. Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[39]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Combined use of pheromone trails and visual landmarks by the common garden ant Lasius niger , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  S. Pratt,et al.  Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  E. B. Wilson Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference , 1927 .

[42]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[43]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the antLasius niger (L.) , 1992, Insectes Sociaux.

[44]  Ted J. Case,et al.  Mechanisms of dispersed central-place foraging in polydomous colonies of the Argentine ant , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Response Threshold Reinforcement and Division of Labor in Insect Societies , 1998 .

[47]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: Routines for MATLAB and R , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[48]  Daniel Merkle,et al.  Adapting to Dynamic Environments: Polyethism in Response Threshold Models for Social Insects , 2009, Adv. Complex Syst..

[49]  Rosli Hashim,et al.  Collective exploitation of a temporally unpredictable food source: mushroom harvesting by the ant Euprenolepis procera , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  A Chemical Releaser of Alarm and Digging Behavior in the Ant Pogonomyrmex Badius (Latreille) , 1958 .

[51]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[52]  Douglas T. Bolger,et al.  EFFECTS OF FRAGMENTATION AND INVASION ON NATIVE ANT COMMUNITIES IN COASTAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA , 1998 .

[53]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of trail laying in the antLasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[54]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  A. Suarez,et al.  Worldwide spread of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2009 .

[56]  G. Fechner Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .