A general modeling framework for describing spatially structured population dynamics

Abstract Variation in movement across time and space fundamentally shapes the abundance and distribution of populations. Although a variety of approaches model structured population dynamics, they are limited to specific types of spatially structured populations and lack a unifying framework. Here, we propose a unified network‐based framework sufficiently novel in its flexibility to capture a wide variety of spatiotemporal processes including metapopulations and a range of migratory patterns. It can accommodate different kinds of age structures, forms of population growth, dispersal, nomadism and migration, and alternative life‐history strategies. Our objective was to link three general elements common to all spatially structured populations (space, time and movement) under a single mathematical framework. To do this, we adopt a network modeling approach. The spatial structure of a population is represented by a weighted and directed network. Each node and each edge has a set of attributes which vary through time. The dynamics of our network‐based population is modeled with discrete time steps. Using both theoretical and real‐world examples, we show how common elements recur across species with disparate movement strategies and how they can be combined under a unified mathematical framework. We illustrate how metapopulations, various migratory patterns, and nomadism can be represented with this modeling approach. We also apply our network‐based framework to four organisms spanning a wide range of life histories, movement patterns, and carrying capacities. General computer code to implement our framework is provided, which can be applied to almost any spatially structured population. This framework contributes to our theoretical understanding of population dynamics and has practical management applications, including understanding the impact of perturbations on population size, distribution, and movement patterns. By working within a common framework, there is less chance that comparative analyses are colored by model details rather than general principles.

[1]  G. McCracken,et al.  Genetic structure in migratory and nonmigratory populations of Brazilian free-tailed bats , 1997 .

[2]  Dean L Urban,et al.  A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  Michael Schaub,et al.  Integrated population models: a novel analysis framework for deeper insights into population dynamics , 2011, Journal of Ornithology.

[4]  T Brandt Ryder,et al.  Connectivity of wood thrush breeding, wintering, and migration sites based on range‐wide tracking , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance , 1990 .

[7]  J. Nichols,et al.  The Role of Local Populations within a Landscape Context: Defining and Classifying Sources and Sinks , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Jay E. Diffendorfer,et al.  A Stage-Structured, Spatially Explicit Migration Model for Myotis Bats: Mortality location affects system dynamics , 2014 .

[9]  A. Farrell,et al.  Physiological Condition Differentially Affects the Behavior and Survival of Two Populations of Sockeye Salmon during Their Freshwater Spawning Migration , 2010, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[10]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Where am I and why? Synthesizing range biology and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal , 2014 .

[11]  F. J. Singer,et al.  Population models for elk, mule deer, and moose on Yellowstone's northern range , 1993 .

[12]  D. Esler.  Applying Metapopulation Theory to Conservation of Migratory Birds , 2000 .

[13]  D. Morris.  Density-dependent habitat selection: Testing the theory with fitness data , 1989, Evolutionary Ecology.

[14]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  Predicting the consequences of carry-over effects for migratory populations , 2006, Biology Letters.

[15]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  Predicting conditions for migration: effects of density dependence and habitat quality , 2007, Biology Letters.

[16]  Jean‐Baptiste Ferdy,et al.  Role of Corridors in Plant Dispersal: an Example with the Endangered Ranunculus nodif lorus , 2003 .

[17]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics of Species with Cryptic Life Stages , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  Metapopulation models for seasonally migratory animals , 2012, Biology Letters.

[19]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  Network thinking in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  D. Norris,et al.  Experimental Examination of Intraspecific Density-Dependent Competition during the Breeding Period in Monarch Butterflies (Danaus plexippus) , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The Northern Yellowstone Elk: Ecology and Management , 1984 .

[22]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[23]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  P. Jagers,et al.  Extinction , 2009, What Fire.

[25]  Silke Bauer,et al.  Mechanistic models of animal migration behaviour--their diversity, structure and use. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[26]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Migratory connectivity of a widely distributed songbird, the American redstart (Setophaga ruticilla) , 2006 .

[27]  Jeffrey J. Buler,et al.  Radar analysis of fall bird migration stopover sites in the northeastern U.S. , 2014 .

[28]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  TESTS OF DENSITY-DEPENDENT HABITAT SELECTION IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT' , 1987 .

[29]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  Population dynamics in migratory networks , 2010, Theoretical Ecology.

[30]  J. Emlen,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES , 2008 .

[31]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Why are metapopulations so rare? , 2012, Ecology.

[32]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[33]  R. Whittaker,et al.  The movement shortfall in bird conservation: accounting for nomadic, dispersive and irruptive species , 2016 .

[34]  M. Coughenour,et al.  Density dependence, compensation, and environmental effects on elk calf mortality in Yellowstone National Park , 1997 .

[35]  Mark L. Taper,et al.  The northern Yellowstone elk: density dependence and climatic conditions , 2002 .

[36]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[37]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Brazilian free-tailed bats as insect pest regulators in transgenic and conventional cotton crops. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[38]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  Animal Migration: A Synthesis , 2011 .

[39]  Gustavo S Betini,et al.  Carry-over effects, sequential density dependence and the dynamics of populations in a seasonal environment , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  B. D. Todd,et al.  Making leaps in amphibian ecotoxicology: translating individual-level effects of contaminants to population viability. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[41]  I. Newton.  The Migration Ecology of Birds , 2007 .

[42]  M. McPeek,et al.  The Evolution of Dispersal in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[43]  M. Kauffman,et al.  Animal migration amid shifting patterns of phenology and predation: lessons from a Yellowstone elk herd. , 2013, Ecology.

[44]  I. Chades,et al.  Adapting environmental management to uncertain but inevitable change , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  J. Diffendorfer,et al.  Dispersal among habitats varying in fitness: reciprocating migration through ideal habitat selection , 2004 .

[46]  J. Willson,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Anthropogenic Stressors on Source‐Sink Dynamics in Pond‐Breeding Amphibians , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[47]  Scott L. Collins,et al.  Importance of Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Species Regional Abundance and Distribution , 1991 .

[48]  Jan-Åke Nilsson,et al.  Patterns of Animal Migration , 2014 .

[49]  James E. Hines,et al.  Stochastic seasonality and nonlinear density-dependent factors regulate population size in an African rodent , 1997, Nature.

[50]  S. Cooke,et al.  Biological carryover effects: linking common concepts and mechanisms in ecology and evolution , 2014 .

[51]  R. Macarthur.  Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[52]  Karen S. Oberhauser,et al.  Temporal and geographical variation in monarch densities: Citizen scientists document monarch population patterns , 2004 .

[53]  M. Gadgil.  Dispersal: Population Consequences and Evolution , 1971 .

[54]  B. Kerr,et al.  Local migration promotes competitive restraint in a host–pathogen 'tragedy of the commons' , 2006, Nature.

[55]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Reinterpreting space, time lags, and functional responses in ecological models. , 2000, Science.

[56]  S. Bearhop,et al.  Carry-over effects as drivers of fitness differences in animals. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[57]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Migratory connectivity magnifies the consequences of habitat loss from sea-level rise for shorebird populations , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  Robert G. Clark,et al.  A modeling framework for integrated harvest and habitat management of North American waterfowl: Case-study of northern pintail metapopulation dynamics , 2012 .

[59]  G. C. Stevens,et al.  Spatial Variation in Abundance , 1995 .

[60]  T. Miller,et al.  Dispersal Rates Affect Species Composition in Metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea Inquilines , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[61]  Paul Beier,et al.  The Role of Landscape Connectivity in Planning and Implementing Conservation and Restoration Priorities. Issues in Ecology , 2012 .

[62]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  On r- and K-Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[63]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  Moving across the border: modeling migratory bat populations , 2013 .

[64]  Vincent Bretagnolle,et al.  Modelling population reinforcement at a large spatial scale as a conservation strategy for the declining little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) in agricultural habitats , 2005 .

[65]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[66]  Nathalie Machon,et al.  Integrating demographic and genetic effects of connections on the viability of an endangered plant in a highly fragmented habitat , 2013 .

[67]  D T Tyler Flockhart,et al.  Unravelling the annual cycle in a migratory animal: breeding-season habitat loss drives population declines of monarch butterflies. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[68]  Demographic network and multi-season occupancy modeling of Rana sylvatica reveal spatial and temporal patterns of population connectivity and persistence , 2013, Landscape Ecology.