Impact of mask errors on full chip error budgets

As lithography pushes to smaller and smaller features under the guidance of Moore's Law, patterned features smaller than the wavelength of light must be routinely manufactured. Lithographic yield in this domain is directly improved with the application of OPC to the pattern data. However, such corrections generally assume that the reticle can reproduce the benefits of OPC in some circumstances. In this paper, we present the characterization of the MEEF for contact holes. These are found to have significantly higher values for the MEEF than typically measured for isolated lines. Theoretical predictions are compared with experimental results. Good agreement is found at the center of the field only when the actual area of the contact hole as formed on the reticle is used as the metric of contact size. Across field variation, however, is found to be significant requires characterization for optimum yield to be achieved.

[1]  Wilhelm Maurer Mask specifications for 193-nm lithography , 1996, Photomask Technology.

[2]  C.H. Stapper,et al.  Integrated circuit yield statistics , 1983, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  C. Scott Bessel Functions of Integer Order , 1998 .

[4]  Avideh Zakhor,et al.  Fast, low-complexity mask design , 1995, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Andreas Grassmann,et al.  How focus budgets are spent: limitations of advanced i-line lithography , 1996, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Andrzej J. Strojwas,et al.  VLSI Yield Prediction and Estimation: A Unified Framework , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Avideh Zakhor,et al.  Fast sparse aerial-image calculation for OPC , 1995, Photomask Technology.

[8]  Avideh Zakhor,et al.  Mathematical and CAD framework for proximity correction , 1996, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Franklin M. Schellenberg Design for manufacturing in the semiconductor industry: the Litho/Design Workshops , 1999, Proceedings Twelfth International Conference on VLSI Design. (Cat. No.PR00013).

[10]  Chris A. Mack Mask Linearity and the Mask Error Enhancement Factor , 1999 .