3D shape and 2D surface textures of human faces: the role of "averages" in attractiveness and age

Abstract Recent work in the psychological literature has indicated that attractive faces are in some ways “average” [J.H. Langlois, L.A. Roggman, Attractive faces are only average, Psychological Science, 1(2) (1990) 115–121] and that the apparent age of a face can be related to its proximity to the average of a computationally derived “face space” [A.J. O'Toole, T. Vetter, H. Volz, E.M. Salter, Three-dimensional caricatures of human heads: distinctiveness and the perception of facial age, Perception, 26 (1997) 719–732]. We examined the relationship between facial attractiveness, age, and “averageness”, using laser scans of faces that were put into complete correspondence with the average face [T. Vetter, V. Blanz, Estimating coloured 3D face models from single images: an example based approach, in: H. Burkhardt, B. Neumann (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Vision, Freiburg, Germany, 1998, pp. 499–513]. This representation enabled selective normalization of the 3D shape versus the surface texture map of the faces. Shape-normalized faces, created by morphing the texture maps from individual faces onto the average head shape, and texture-normalized faces, created by morphing the average texture onto the shape of each individual face, were judged by human subjects to be both more attractive and younger than the original faces. The study shows that relatively global, psychologically meaningful attributes of faces can be modeled very simply in face spaces of this sort.

[1]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[2]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human facial beauty , 1993, Human nature.

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces , 1986, Perception.

[5]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual Processing of Facial Distinctiveness , 1994, Perception.

[6]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[7]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organization and associative memory: 3rd edition , 1989 .

[8]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[9]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: an application of three-dimensional morphing , 1999, Vision Research.

[10]  A. O'Toole,et al.  The perception of face gender: The role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[11]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. , 1994 .

[12]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Averageness, Exaggeration, and Facial Attractiveness , 1996 .

[14]  P. Anandan,et al.  Hierarchical Model-Based Motion Estimation , 1992, ECCV.

[15]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[16]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[17]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space , 1993 .

[18]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Linear Object Classes and Image Synthesis From a Single Example Image , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Article Commentary: A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Reply to “On the Difficulty of Averaging Faces” , 1991 .

[20]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[21]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Synthesising continuous-tone caricatures , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  L Sirovich,et al.  Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[25]  A J O'Toole,et al.  Facial Aging, Attractiveness, and Distinctiveness , 1998, Perception.

[26]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[27]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Example Based Image Analysis and Synthesis , 1993 .

[28]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Three-Dimensional Caricatures of Human Heads: Distinctiveness and the Perception of Facial Age , 1997, Perception.

[30]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Separation of texture and shape in images of faces for image coding and synthesis , 1997 .

[31]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[32]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Estimating Coloured 3D Face Models from Single Images: An Example Based Approach , 1998, ECCV.

[33]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[34]  John B. Pittenger Article Commentary: On the Difficulty of Averaging Faces: Comments on Langlois and Roggman , 1991 .

[35]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Image Representations for Visual Learning , 1996, Science.

[36]  Leah L. Light,et al.  Why Attractive People are Harder to Remember , 1981 .

[37]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .

[38]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect , 1994, Memory & cognition.