Binary polyp-size classification based on deep-learned spatial information

The size information of detected polyps is an essential factor for diagnosis in colon cancer screening. For example, adenomas and sessile serrated polyps that are ≥10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge 10$$\end{document} mm are considered advanced, and shorter surveillance intervals are recommended for smaller polyps. However, sometimes the subjective estimations of endoscopists are incorrect and overestimate the sizes. To circumvent these difficulties, we developed a method for automatic binary polyp-size classification between two polyp sizes: from 1 to 9 mm and ≥10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge 10$$\end{document} mm. We introduce a binary polyp-size classification method that estimates a polyp’s three-dimensional spatial information. This estimation is comprised of polyp localisation and depth estimation. The combination of location and depth information expresses a polyp’s three-dimensional shape. In experiments, we quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the proposed method using 787 polyps of both protruded and flat types. The proposed method’s best classification accuracy outperformed the fine-tuned state-of-the-art image classification methods. Post-processing of sequential voting increased the classification accuracy and achieved classification accuracy of 0.81 and 0.88 for polyps ranging from 1 to 9 mm and others that are ≥10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge 10$$\end{document} mm. Qualitative analysis revealed the importance of polyp localisation even in polyp-size classification. We developed a binary polyp-size classification method by utilising the estimated three-dimensional shape of a polyp. Experiments demonstrated accurate classification for both protruded- and flat-type polyps, even though the flat type have ambiguous boundary between a polyp and colon wall.

[1]  Kensaku Mori,et al.  Fast software-based volume rendering using multimedia instructions on PC platforms and its application to virtual endoscopy , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Hedda Lausberg,et al.  Methods in Gesture Research: , 2009 .

[3]  D. Han,et al.  Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size. , 2011, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[4]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[5]  David Lieberman,et al.  Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline , 2013, Endoscopy.

[6]  D. Rex,et al.  Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists. , 2014, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[7]  D. Ahlquist,et al.  Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size. , 2016, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  J. Dominitz,et al.  Use of a novel polyp "ruler snare" improves estimation of colon polyp size. , 2016, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[9]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathology , 2016, Endoscopy.

[10]  C. Hassan,et al.  Addressing bias in polyp size measurement , 2016, Endoscopy.

[11]  François Chollet,et al.  Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[12]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning , 2016, AAAI.

[13]  Hayato Itoh,et al.  Towards Automated Colonoscopy Diagnosis: Binary Polyp Size Estimation via Unsupervised Depth Learning , 2018, MICCAI.

[14]  Vijay Vasudevan,et al.  Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement , 2018, ArXiv.

[16]  K. Mori,et al.  Development of a computer-aided detection system for colonoscopy and a publicly accessible large colonoscopy video database (with video). , 2020, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  M. Vieth,et al.  Endoscopic tissue sampling – Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline , 2021, Endoscopy.

[18]  Masahiro Oda,et al.  Unsupervised colonoscopic depth estimation by domain translations with a Lambertian-reflection keeping auxiliary task , 2021, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.