SAR Image Speckle Reduction Based on Nonconvex Hybrid Total Variation Model

Speckle noise inherent in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images seriously affects the visual effect and brings great difficulties to the postprocessing of the SAR image. Due to the edge-preserving feature, total variation (TV) regularization-based techniques have been extensively utilized to reduce the speckle. However, the strong scatters in SAR image with radiometry several orders of magnitude larger than their surrounding regions limit the effectiveness of TV regularization. Meanwhile, the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\ell _{1}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-norm first-order TV regularization sometimes causes staircase artifacts as it favors solutions that are piecewise constant, and it usually underestimates high-amplitude components of image gradient as the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\ell _{1}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-norm uniformly penalizes the amplitude. To overcome these shortcomings, a new hybrid variation model, called Fisher–Tippett (FT) distribution-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\ell _{p}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-norm first-and second-order hybrid TVs (HTpVs), is proposed to reduce the speckle after removing the strong scatters. Especially, the FT-HTpV inherits the advantages of the distribution based data fidelity term, the nonconvex regularization, and the higher order TV regularization. Therefore, it can effectively remove the speckle while preserving point scatters and edges and reducing staircase artifacts well. To efficiently solve the nonconvex minimization problem, an iterative framework with a nonmonotone-accelerated proximal gradient (nmAPG) method and a matrix-vector acceleration strategy are used. Extensive experiments on both the simulated and real SAR images demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  S. Quegan,et al.  Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1998 .

[2]  Fabrizio Argenti,et al.  Multiresolution MAP Despeckling of SAR Images Based on Locally Adaptive Generalized Gaussian pdf Modeling , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Henri Maître,et al.  Ratio-Based Multitemporal SAR Images Denoising: RABASAR , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[5]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  Benchmarking Framework for SAR Despeckling , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Davide Cozzolino,et al.  SAR image despeckling through convolutional neural networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[7]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Sedigheh Ghofrani,et al.  High-TV Based CS Framework Using MAP Estimator for SAR Image Enhancement , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Davide Cozzolino,et al.  Fast Adaptive Nonlocal SAR Despeckling , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[11]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  J. Jennifer Ranjani,et al.  Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform Based SAR Despeckling Using Interscale Dependence , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  Optical-Driven Nonlocal SAR Despeckling , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[17]  Karl Kunisch,et al.  Total Generalized Variation , 2010, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[18]  Ting-Zhu Huang,et al.  Second order total generalized variation for speckle reduction in ultrasound images , 2018, J. Frankl. Inst..

[19]  Gangyao Kuang,et al.  Classification on the Monogenic Scale Space: Application to Target Recognition in SAR Image , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Hong Qiao,et al.  A Higher-Order MRF Based Variational Model for Multiplicative Noise Reduction , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[21]  Maurizio di Bisceglie,et al.  CFAR detection of extended objects in high-resolution SAR images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Noise Smoothing Filter for Images with Signal-Dependent Noise , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  Hybrid SAR Speckle Reduction Using Complex Wavelet Shrinkage and Non-Local PCA-Based Filtering , 2019, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Shuaiqi Liu,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar image de-noising based on Shearlet transform using the context-based model , 2014, Phys. Commun..

[25]  Florence Tupin,et al.  Iterative Weighted Maximum Likelihood Denoising With Probabilistic Patch-Based Weights , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Multiplicative Noise Removal Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Baha Sen,et al.  Sparsity-Driven Despeckling for SAR Images , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[28]  Matteo Matteucci,et al.  Deep Learning for SAR Image Despeckling , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[29]  Florence Tupin,et al.  Multitemporal SAR Image Decomposition into Strong Scatterers, Background, and Speckle , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[30]  E. Nezry,et al.  Structure detection and statistical adaptive speckle filtering in SAR images , 1993 .

[31]  Maryam Dehghani,et al.  A contextual-based segmentation of compact PolSAR images using Markov Random Field (MRF) model , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[32]  Masoud Mahdianpari,et al.  A Gaussian random field model for de-speckling of multi-polarized Synthetic Aperture Radar data , 2019, Advances in Space Research.

[33]  Jie Huang,et al.  Speckle noise removal in ultrasound images by first- and second-order total variation , 2018, Numerical Algorithms.

[34]  J. R. Jensen Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective , 2000 .

[35]  Yang Gao,et al.  Speckle Reduction via Higher Order Total Variation Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[36]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[37]  Yao Zhao,et al.  Adaptive Total Variation Regularization Based SAR Image Despeckling and Despeckling Evaluation Index , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[38]  Vishal M. Patel,et al.  SAR Image Despeckling Using a Convolutional Neural Network , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[39]  Yuan-Yuan Liu,et al.  An improved SAR interferogram denoising method based on principal component analysis and the Goldstein filter , 2018 .

[40]  Jian Yang,et al.  Patch Ordering-Based SAR Image Despeckling Via Transform-Domain Filtering , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[41]  Fabrizio Argenti,et al.  Segmentation-Based MAP Despeckling of SAR Images in the Undecimated Wavelet Domain , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[42]  Mihai Datcu,et al.  Despeckling of TerraSAR-X Data Using Second-Generation Wavelets , 2010, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[43]  Jie Geng,et al.  An iterative low-rank representation for SAR image despeckling , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[44]  Hong Qiao,et al.  A Variational Model for PolSAR Data Speckle Reduction Based on the Wishart Distribution , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[45]  Florence Tupin,et al.  NL-SAR: A Unified Nonlocal Framework for Resolution-Preserving (Pol)(In)SAR Denoising , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[46]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  A Nonlocal SAR Image Denoising Algorithm Based on LLMMSE Wavelet Shrinkage , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  Maoguo Gong,et al.  SAR Image Despeckling Based on Local Homogeneous-Region Segmentation by Using Pixel-Relativity Measurement , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[48]  Alin Achim,et al.  SAR image denoising via Bayesian wavelet shrinkage based on heavy-tailed modeling , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[49]  Davide Cozzolino,et al.  Guided Patchwise Nonlocal SAR Despeckling , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[50]  Chaomin Shen,et al.  Image restoration combining a total variational filter and a fourth-order filter , 2007, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[51]  Gangyao Kuang,et al.  SAR Image Despeckling Based on Nonlocal Low-Rank Regularization , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[52]  F. Zama,et al.  A nonconvex penalization algorithm with automatic choice of the regularization parameter in sparse imaging , 2019, Inverse Problems.

[53]  Gangyao Kuang,et al.  A SAR Image Despeckling Method Using Multi-Scale Nonlocal Low-Rank Model , 2020, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[54]  Yi Su,et al.  Unsupervised polarimetric SAR urban area classification based on model-based decomposition with cross scattering , 2016 .

[55]  Kai Xu,et al.  Speckle Suppression by Weighted Euclidean Distance Anisotropic Diffusion , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[56]  Biao Hou,et al.  SAR Image Despeckling Based on Nonsubsampled Shearlet Transform , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[57]  William J. Emery,et al.  Gabor Feature Based Unsupervised Change Detection of Multitemporal SAR Images Based on Two-Level Clustering , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[58]  Huan Li,et al.  Accelerated Proximal Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Programming , 2015, NIPS.

[59]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  Statistical properties of logarithmically transformed speckle , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[60]  S. Osher,et al.  Image restoration: Total variation, wavelet frames, and beyond , 2012 .

[61]  Florence Tupin,et al.  MuLoG, or How to Apply Gaussian Denoisers to Multi-Channel SAR Speckle Reduction? , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[62]  Vahid Akbari,et al.  Speckle reduction and restoration of synthetic aperture radar data with an adoptive markov random field model , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[63]  Xiao-Ping Zhang,et al.  SAR image despeckling by combination of fractional-order total variation and nonlocal low rank regularization , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[64]  Liming Tang,et al.  A generalized hybrid nonconvex variational regularization model for staircase reduction in image restoration , 2019, Neurocomputing.

[65]  Gilles Aubert,et al.  A Variational Approach to Removing Multiplicative Noise , 2008, SIAM J. Appl. Math..