Results of a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Partnerships for Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative for Diabetes Care

Purpose: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives have been implemented to facilitate transition to a chronic disease management approach in primary health care. However, the effect of QI initiatives on diabetes clinical processes and outcomes remains unclear. This article reports the effect of Partnerships for Health, a QI program implemented in Southwestern Ontario, Canada, on diabetes clinical process and outcome measures and describes program participants' views of elements that influenced their ability to reach desired improvements. Methods: Part of an external, concurrent, comprehensive, mixed-methods evaluation of Partnerships for Health, a before/after audit of 30 charts of patient of program physicians (n = 35) and semistructured interviews with program participants (physicians and allied health providers) were conducted. Results: The proportion of patients (n = 998) with a documented test/examination for the following clinical processes significantly improved (P ≤ .005): glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c), cholesterol, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, electrocardiogram, foot/eye/neuropathy examination, body mass index, waist circumference, and depression screening. Data showed intensification of treatment and significant improvement in the number of patients at target for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and blood pressure (BP) (P ≤ .001). Mean LDL and BP values decreased significantly (P ≤ .01), and an analysis of patients above glycemic targets (A1c >7% at baseline) showed a significant decrease in mean A1c values (P ≤ .01). Interview participants (n = 55) described using a team approach, improved collaborative and proactive care through better tracking of patient data, and increased patient involvement as elements that positively influenced clinical processes and outcomes. Conclusions: QI initiatives like Partnerships for Health can result in improved diabetes clinical process and outcome measures in primary health care.

[1]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance. , 2013, International journal of nursing studies.

[2]  A. Brousselle,et al.  HOW DOES COMPLEXITY IMPACT EVALUATION? AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE. , 2012, The Canadian journal of program evaluation = La Revue canadienne d'evaluation de programme.

[3]  Lynda Rey,et al.  DISCUSSION: PRACTICE-BASED EVALUATION AS A RESPONSE TO ADRESS INTERVENTION COMPLEXITY. , 2012, The Canadian journal of program evaluation = La Revue canadienne d'evaluation de programme.

[4]  Gretchen A. Stevens,et al.  National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2·7 million participants , 2011, The Lancet.

[5]  E. Strumpf,et al.  Primary Health Care in Canada: Systems In Motion , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[6]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Evaluation of Patient Centered Medical Home Practice Transformation Initiatives , 2011, Medical care.

[7]  A. Willan,et al.  Clinical inertia in patients with T2DM requiring insulin in family practice. , 2010, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[8]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent and Control Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[9]  M. Friedberg,et al.  Primary care: a critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care. , 2010, Health affairs.

[10]  G. Verbeke,et al.  Start improving the quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes through a general practice support program: a cluster randomized trial. , 2010, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[11]  D. DeWalt,et al.  Collaboration in Pennsylvania: Rapidly spreading improved chronic care for patients to practices , 2010, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[12]  E. Wagner,et al.  Untangling practice redesign from disease management: how do we best care for the chronically ill? , 2009, Annual review of public health.

[13]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  R. Grol,et al.  Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  M. Stewart,et al.  Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[16]  M. Chin,et al.  Improving and Sustaining Diabetes Care in Community Health Centers With the Health Disparities Collaboratives , 2007, Medical care.

[17]  A James O'Malley,et al.  Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[19]  K. Shojania,et al.  Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. , 2006, JAMA.

[20]  T. Macdonald.  Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment , 2006 .

[21]  S. R. Lavinghouze.  Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation, and Effectiveness , 2005, Preventing Chronic Disease.

[22]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Teleconferenced educational detailing: Diabetes education for primary care physicians , 2005, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[23]  D. Porterfield,et al.  The North Carolina experience with the diabetes health disparities collaboratives. , 2004, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[24]  Brian S Mittman,et al.  Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  Melissa Ahern,et al.  Improved clinical outcomes for fee-for-service physician practices participating in a diabetes care collaborative. , 2004, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[26]  E. Wagner,et al.  A state-level application of the chronic illness breakthrough series: results from two collaboratives on diabetes in Washington State. , 2004, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[27]  Victoria Barr,et al.  The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. , 2003, Hospital quarterly.

[28]  E H Wagner,et al.  Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[29]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  A. Petrosino.  Answering the Why Question in Evaluation: The Causal-Model Approach , 2000, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.

[31]  Ronald D. Moen,et al.  The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[32]  M. Lorentzon.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[33]  Brian Rush,et al.  Program Logic Models: Expanding Their Role and Structure for Program Planning and Evaluation , 1991, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.

[34]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee , 2013 .

[35]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  Current Practices and Emerging Trends in Conducting Mixed Methods Intervention Studies in the Health Sciences , 2010 .

[36]  John Doucette,et al.  Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  L. Piterman,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Breakthrough Series Methodology , 2008 .

[38]  M. Stewart,et al.  Diabetes Management in Canada: Baseline Results of the Group Practice Diabetes Management Study , 2006 .

[39]  M. Chin,et al.  Improving diabetes care in midwest community health centers with the health disparities collaborative. , 2004, Diabetes care.