Root cap structure and cell production rates of maize (Zea mays) roots in compacted sand.

•  To assess the influence of mechanical impedance on cell fluxes in the root cap, maize (Zea mays) seedlings were grown in either loose or compacted sand with penetration resistances of 0.2 MPa and 3.8 MPa, respectively. Numbers of cap cells were estimated using image analysis, and cell doubling times using the colchicine technique. •  There were 5930 cells in the caps in the compact and 6900 cells in the loose control after 24 h growth in sand. Cell production rates were 2010 cells d-1 in compact and 1570 cells d-1 in loose sand. •  These numbers represent accumulations of 4960 and 3540 detached cells d-1 around the cap periphery following the two types of treatment. The total number of detached cells was estimated as sufficient to completely cover the whole root cap in the compact sand, but only 11% of the root cap in the loose sand. •  In conclusion, mechanical impedance slightly enhanced meristematic activities in the lateral region of the root cap. The release of extra border cells would aid root penetration into the compact sand.

[1]  F. Clowes.  Duration of the Mitotic Cycle in a Meristem , 1961 .

[2]  K. Barley.  The Effect of Localized Pressure on the Growth of the Maize Radicle , 1965 .

[3]  Janet K. Thompson,et al.  The Quiescent Centre and Rates of Mitosis in the Root Meristem of Allium sativum , 1968 .

[4]  F. A. L. Clowes,et al.  The Proportion of Cells that Divide in Root Meristems of Zea mays L. , 1971 .

[5]  J. Torrey,et al.  DURATION OF CELL CYCLES IN CULTURED ROOTS OF CONVOLVULUS , 1972 .

[6]  P. D. Macdonald,et al.  An analysis of the mitotic cell cycle in the root meristem of Zea mays , 1973, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  P. Barlow.  REGENERATION OF THE CAP OF PRIMARY ROOTS OF ZEA MAYS , 1974 .

[8]  V. Baligar,et al.  Soybean Root Anatomy as Influenced by Soil Bulk Density1 , 1975 .

[9]  P. Barlow.  An Experimental Study of Cell and Nuclear Growth and Their Relation to Cell Diversification within a Plant Tissue , 1977 .

[10]  R. Scott Russell,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Impedance on Root Growth in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) III. OBSERVATIONS ON THE MECHANISM OF RESPONSE , 1980 .

[11]  Michael J. Goss,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Impedance on Root Growth in Barley, Hordeum vulgare L.II. EFFECTS ON CELL DEVELOPMENT IN SEMINAL ROOTS , 1977 .

[12]  R. Woolston,et al.  Sloughing of Root Cap Cells , 1978 .

[13]  Cell Displacement Through the Columella of the Root Cap of Zea mays L , 1978 .

[14]  A. T. Taylor,et al.  TEMPERATURE AND THE COORDINATION OF CELL CYCLES WITHIN THE ROOT MERISTEM OF ALLIUM SATIVUM L. , 1978 .

[15]  F. Clowes.  The Difference Between Open and Closed Meristems , 1981 .

[16]  S. A. Barber,et al.  Soybean Root Morphology and K Uptake1 , 1981 .

[17]  N. Souty,et al.  Aspect mécanique de la croissance des racines. I. Mesure de la force de pénétration , 1987 .

[18]  J. R. Pardales,et al.  Effects of soil compaction on the development of rice and maize root systems , 1991 .

[19]  P. Barlow,et al.  A comparison of the effectiveness of colchicine and oryzalin in estimating cell doubling times in a root meristem , 1992 .

[20]  M. Iijima,et al.  Development of Golgi Apparatus in the Root Cap Cells of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Affected by Compacted Soil , 1992 .

[21]  P. Barlow.  The Meristem and Quiescent Centre in Cultured Root Apices of the gib-l Mutant of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) , 1992 .

[22]  Blair M. McKenzie,et al.  Sloughing of root cap cells decreases the frictional resistance to maize (Zea mays L.) root growth , 1997 .

[23]  Brigham,et al.  Meristem-specific suppression of mitosis and a global switch in gene expression in the root cap of pea by endogenous signals , 1998, Plant physiology.

[24]  J. Pritchard,et al.  The effect of mechanical impedance on root growth in pea (Pisum sativum). I. Rates of cell flux, mitosis, and strain during recovery , 1999 .

[25]  B. Griffiths,et al.  Sloughing of cap cells and carbon exudation from maize seedling roots in compacted sand. , 2000, The New phytologist.

[26]  J. Pritchard,et al.  The effect of mechanical impedance on root growth in pea (Pisum sativum). II. Cell expansion and wall rheology during recovery , 2000 .

[27]  M. Hawes,et al.  Stimulation of border cell production in response to increased carbon dioxide levels. , 2000, Plant physiology.

[28]  M. Iijima,et al.  Image analysis of maize root caps - Estimating cell numbers from 2-D longitudinal sections , 2001 .

[29]  A. G. Bengough,et al.  Influence of soil strength on root growth: experiments and analysis using a critical‐state model , 2002 .

[30]  Peter J. Gregory,et al.  Physical properties of axenic maize root mucilage , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[31]  B. W. Veen.  The influence of mechanical impedance on the growth of maize roots , 1982, Plant and Soil.

[32]  A. J. Wilson,et al.  Some observations of the effects of mechanical impedance upon the ultrastructure of the root caps of barley , 1979, Protoplasma.