Resource-Based View in Empirical IT Business Value Research--An Evidence-Based Literature Review

Recently, the Resource-based View (RBV) attracts more attention in IT business value research, as it serves as a theoretical framework for the identification of IT resources impacting firm performance. Although numerous empirical studies applying the RBV can be found, systematic research structuring the obtained knowledge is hardly available. Therefore, we conduct an evidence-based literature review to structure and consolidate empirical evidence from studies using the RBV as a theoretical foundation. We illustrate how different IT resources can be distinguished and classified by considering their operationalization. With the means of our research map we illustrate our findings and their evidence pointing out contradictory results of how different classes of IT resources affect the IT business value in terms of the competitive advantage. We discuss some direct effects of IT resources on the competitive advantage as well as research gaps. Finally, we present implications regarding the RBV in IT business value research.

[1]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[2]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[3]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[6]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  An Information Company in Mexico: Extending the Resource-Based View of the Firm to a Developing Country Context , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[8]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[11]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  e-Commerce Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the Value of e-Commerce to Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Sector , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[15]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[16]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[18]  U. Flick Triangulation : eine Einführung , 2004 .

[19]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[20]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[21]  W. V. Grembergen IT Governance and Its Mechanisms , 2004 .

[22]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[23]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[24]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  M. J. Zhang Information systems, strategic flexibility and firm performance: An empirical investigation , 2005 .

[26]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[27]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Binshan Lin,et al.  An empirical study of relationship between IT investment and firm performance: A resource-based perspective , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  A resource-based view of electronic commerce , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  THE IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON SUPPLY CHAIN CAPABILITIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2006 .

[31]  Dag H. Olsen,et al.  An empirical investigation of competency factors affecting e-business success in European SMEs , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Stephen K. Callaway,et al.  More bang for your buck: Small firms and the importance of aligned information technology capabilities and strategic flexibility , 2007 .

[33]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  The Role of Information Systems Resources in ERP Capability Building and Business Process Outcomes , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Impact of Capabilities and Prior Investments on Online Channel Commitment and Performance , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Monideepa Tarafdar,et al.  Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Nancy W. Davidson,et al.  EXAMINATION OF A PATH MODEL RELATING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE WITH FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2008 .

[39]  Man Zhang,et al.  Unpacking the effect of IT capability on the performance of export‐focused SMEs: a report from China , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[40]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Hyun-Soo Han,et al.  Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success: A process perspective , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Qiang Wang,et al.  THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY OF THIRD‐PARTY LOGISTICS PROVIDERS: A RESOURCE‐BASED VIEW AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM CHINA , 2008 .

[43]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Analyzing e-business value creation from a resource-based perspective , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[44]  Waleed A. Muhanna,et al.  Information Technology and Process Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Interaction Between IT and Non-IT Resources , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[45]  Natalia Juristo Juzgado,et al.  Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments , 2009, Empirical Software Engineering.

[46]  Lior Fink,et al.  Exploring the perceived business value of the flexibility enabled by information technology infrastructure , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[48]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Enterprise Governance of Information Technology , 2019, Management for Professionals.

[49]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Towards a Research Method for Theory-driven Design Research , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[50]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Building theory in the sciences of the artificial , 2009, DESRIST.

[51]  Andrew Schwarz,et al.  A Dynamic Capabilities Approach to Understanding the Impact of IT-Enabled Businesses Processes and IT-Business Alignment on the Strategic and Operational Performance of the Firm , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Guido Schryen,et al.  Ökonomischer Wert von Informationssystemen - Beitrag von Literatur-Reviews zum Wissenserhalt ( = Preserving Knowledge on IS Business Value. What Literature Reviews Have Done) , 2010 .

[53]  Varun Grover,et al.  Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[54]  Guido Schryen,et al.  Preserving Knowledge on IS Business Value , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[55]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  A capabilities-based approach to obtaining a deeper understanding of information technology governance effectiveness: Evidence from IT steering committees , 2010, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Matthias Goeken,et al.  Evidence-Based Structuring and Evaluation of Empirical Research in Requirements Engineering , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[57]  Peter Loos,et al.  On the Relevance of Design Knowledge for Design-Oriented Business and Information Systems Engineering , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[58]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: a meta analysis , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[59]  Carla L. Wilkin,et al.  Towards an integrated view of IT value measurement , 2010, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..