Impact of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Severity on Scheimpflug-Derived Parameters After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate how Scheimpflug-derived parameters of eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) are influenced by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) depending on FECD severity and the presence of subclinical edema. METHODS A retrospective cohort study including 115 eyes (115 patients) that underwent DMEK for FECD and a control group of 27 eyes with nonpathological corneas was conducted. Preoperative and 6 months postoperative Scheimpflug imaging was used to analyze pachymetry, presence of tomographic features (loss of isopachs/displacement of the thinnest point/focal posterior depression), and corneal backscatter. FECD severity was based on the modified Krachmer scale and the absence/presence of subclinical edema. RESULTS Scheimpflug-derived pachymetry, tomographic, and corneal backscatter parameters were correlated with FECD severity, and all changed from preoperatively to postoperatively (all P < 0.05). Postoperative central corneal thickness, anterior and posterior corneal backscatter, and presence of focal posterior depression remained different from the control group (all P < 0.05). Of eyes without preoperative clinical edema (n = 75), 18.7% showed 0 or 1 tomographic feature (no edema group) and 82.4% had 2 or 3 features (subclinical edema group). Compared with the control group, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity for the "no edema" group did not differ (0.03 ± 0.12 vs. -0.02 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.150) but was worse for the subclinical edema group (0.06 ± 0.08 vs. -0.02 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS For eyes without preoperative edema, more parameters reversed back to 'normal' levels than for eyes with (sub)clinical edema. Although most analyzed parameters correlated with FECD severity, corneal tomography might be best suited for objective grading of disease severity to aid in surgical decision-making.

[1]  Sanjay V. Patel Imaging Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy in Clinical Practice and Clinical Trials , 2021, Cornea.

[2]  A. Muriel,et al.  A risk prediction model for endothelial keratoplasty after uncomplicated cataract surgery in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. , 2021, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Daniel B. Zander,et al.  Predicting Edema Resolution After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Dystrophy Using Scheimpflug Tomography. , 2021, JAMA ophthalmology.

[4]  A. Wylęgała,et al.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: The vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis , 2020, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[5]  I. Dapena,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Ten-Year Graft Survival and Clinical Outcomes. , 2020, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Oellerich,et al.  Parameters associated with endothelial cell density variability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2020, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Predicting the Prognosis of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy by Using Scheimpflug Tomography. , 2020, Ophthalmology.

[8]  S. Böhringer,et al.  Effect of surgical indication and preoperative lens status on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty outcomes. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  F. Arnalich-Montiel,et al.  Preoperative risk assessment for progression to DMEK following cataract surgery in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Sokratis Sklavos,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Corneal Densitometry, Thickness Profile, and Volume Distribution After Uneventful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2019, Cornea.

[11]  P. Enders,et al.  Corneal Densitometry as a Predictive Diagnostic Tool for Visual Acuity Results After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Determining Subclinical Edema in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Revised Classification using Scheimpflug Tomography for Preoperative Assessment. , 2019, Ophthalmology.

[13]  H. Van Esch,et al.  Two-Year Refractive Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[14]  Gilles Thuret,et al.  Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking. , 2016, JAMA ophthalmology.

[15]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Corneal High-Order Aberrations and Backscatter in Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[16]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Corneal abnormalities early in the course of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[17]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Optical quality of the cornea after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: subjective grading versus objective grading based on the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[19]  E. G. Groeneveld-van Beek,et al.  Standardized ‘no‐touch’ donor tissue preparation for DALK and DMEK: harvesting undamaged anterior and posterior transplants from the same donor cornea , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[20]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  J. Krachmer,et al.  Corneal endothelial dystrophy. A study of 64 families. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.