On the role of surface tension in the stabilization of globular proteins

The stabilization of proteins by a variety of co‐solvents can be related to their property of increasing the surface tension of water. It is demonstrated that, during the thermal unfolding of proteins, this increase of the surface tension can be overcome by the increase in the temperature of the solution at the midpoint of the transition, Tm, and the weak binding of co‐solvent molecules. Three such co‐solvents were studied: trehalose, lysine hydrochloride (LysHCl), and arginine hydrochloride (ArgHCl). Trehalose and LysHCl increase the midpoint of Tm. The increase of the surface tension by addition of trehalose is completely compensated by its decrease due to the increase in Tm. However, for LysHCl, the increase of the surface tension by the co‐solvent is partly reduced by its binding to the protein. For trehalose, preferential interaction measurements with RNaseA demonstrate that it is totally excluded from the protein. In contrast, LysHCl gives evidence of binding to RNaseA. ArgHCl also increases the surface tension of water. Nevertheless, Tm of RNaseA decreases on addition of ArgHCl to the solution. Preferential interaction measurements showed very small values of preferential hydration of the native protein, indicating extensive binding of ArgHCl to the protein. During unfolding, the amount of additional ArgHCl binding is sufficiently large to counteract the surface tension effects, and the protein is destabilized. Therefore, although surface tension appears to be a critical factor in the stabilization of proteins, its increase by co‐solvent does not ensure increased stabilization. The binding of ligands can reduce significantly, or even overwhelm, its effects.

[1]  M. E. Clark,et al.  Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. , 1982, Science.

[2]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Why preferential hydration does not always stabilize the native structure of globular proteins. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[3]  W. F. Harrington,et al.  A model for the myosin molecule. , 1960, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Small-angle x-ray scattering. , 1973, Methods in enzymology.

[5]  J. Schellman A simple model for solvation in mixed solvents. Applications to the stabilization and destabilization of macromolecular structures. , 1990, Biophysical chemistry.

[6]  O. Bonner Osmotic and activity coefficients of some amino acids and their hydrochloride salts at 298.15 K , 1982 .

[7]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Mechanism of protein salting in and salting out by divalent cation salts: balance between hydration and salt binding. , 1984, Biochemistry.

[8]  C. Tanford,et al.  Interfacial free energy and the hydrophobic effect. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Wyman,et al.  LINKED FUNCTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EFFECTS IN HEMOGLOBIN: A SECOND LOOK. , 1964, Advances in protein chemistry.

[10]  G. Somero Protons, osmolytes, and fitness of internal milieu for protein function. , 1986, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  J. Schellman The thermodynamic stability of proteins. , 1987, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[12]  Krigbaum Wr,et al.  Molecular conformation of chymotrypsinogen and chymotrypsin by low-angle x-ray diffraction. , 1968 .

[13]  S. N. Timasheff Water as ligand: preferential binding and exclusion of denaturants in protein unfolding. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[14]  B Honig,et al.  Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. , 1991, Science.

[15]  G. Scatchard,et al.  Physical chemistry of protein solutions; derivation of the equations for the osmotic pressure. , 1946, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  PARTIAL SPECIFIC VOLUMES AND REFRACTIVE INDEX INCREMENTS IN MULTICOMPONENT SYSTEMS1 , 1961 .

[17]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Preferential interactions of proteins with salts in concentrated solutions. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[18]  G. Somero,et al.  Solute compatibility with enzyme function and structure: rationales for the selection of osmotic agents and end-products of anaerobic metabolism in marine invertebrates. , 1979, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[19]  M. Jhon,et al.  Curvature Dependence of the Surface Tension and the Theory of Solubility , 1970 .

[20]  K. Sharp,et al.  Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons , 1991, Proteins.

[21]  S. Abdulnur,et al.  HYDROPHOBIC STACKING OF BASES AND THE SOLVENT DENATURATION OF DNA * , 1964 .

[22]  T. Lin,et al.  Contribution of the surface free energy perturbation to protein-solvent interactions. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[23]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  Bovine serum albumin and aqueous guanidine hydrochloride solutions. Preferential and absolute interactions and comparison with other systems. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[24]  J. Gibbs On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances , 1878, American Journal of Science and Arts.

[25]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  Deoxyribonueleate solutions: Sedimentation in a density gradient, partial specific volumes, density and refractive index increments, and preferential interactions , 1968, Biopolymers.

[26]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Preferential interactions of proteins with solvent components in aqueous amino acid solutions. , 1983, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[27]  T. Arakawa,et al.  The mechanism of action of Na glutamate, lysine HCl, and piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) in the stabilization of tubulin and microtubule formation. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Light Scattering Arising from Composition Fluctuations in Multi‐Component Systems , 1950 .

[29]  J. Lee,et al.  Measurements of preferential solvent interactions by densimetric techniques. , 1979, Methods in enzymology.

[30]  J. Lee,et al.  The stabilization of proteins by sucrose. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  J. Lee,et al.  Partial specific volumes and interactions with solvent components of proteins in guanidine hydrochloride. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[32]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTICOMPONENT SOLUTIONS. , 1964, Advances in protein chemistry.

[33]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The extrapolation of light-scattering data to zero concentration. , 1959, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[34]  S. Abdulnur,et al.  EFFECT OF WATER AND OTHER SOLVENTS ON THE STRUCTURE OF BIOPOLYMERS. , 1965, Federation proceedings.

[35]  W. Stockmayer Light Scattering in Multi‐Component Systems , 1950 .

[36]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Stabilization of protein structure by sugars. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[37]  R. Breslow,et al.  Surface tension measurements show that chaotropic salting-in denaturants are not just water-structure breakers. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[39]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Are freezing and dehydration similar stress vectors? A comparison of modes of interaction of stabilizing solutes with biomolecules , 1990 .

[40]  K. Gekko,et al.  Mechanism of protein stabilization by glycerol: preferential hydration in glycerol-water mixtures. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[41]  S. Moore,et al.  On the aggregation of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease. , 1962, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.