Effects of Visual Display on Joint Excursions Used to Play Virtual Dodgeball

Background Virtual reality (VR) interventions hold great potential for rehabilitation as commercial systems are becoming more affordable and can be easily applied to both clinical and home settings. Objective In this study, we sought to determine how differences in the VR display type can influence motor behavior, cognitive load, and participant engagement. Methods Movement patterns of 17 healthy young adults (8 female, 9 male) were examined during games of Virtual Dodgeball presented on a three-dimensional television (3DTV) and a head-mounted display (HMD). The participant’s avatar was presented from a third-person perspective on a 3DTV and from a first-person perspective on an HMD. Results Examination of motor behavior revealed significantly greater excursions of the knee (P=.003), hip (P<.001), spine (P<.001), shoulder (P=.001), and elbow (P=.026) during HMD versus 3DTV gameplay, resulting in significant differences in forward (P=.003) and downward (P<.001) displacement of the whole-body center of mass. Analyses of cognitive load and engagement revealed that relative to 3DTV, participants indicated that HMD gameplay resulted in greater satisfaction with overall performance and was less frustrating (P<.001). There were no significant differences noted for mental demand. Conclusions Differences in visual display type and participant perspective influence how participants perform in Virtual Dodgeball. Because VR use within rehabilitation settings is often designed to help restore movement following orthopedic or neurologic injury, these findings provide an important caveat regarding the need to consider the potential influence of presentation format and perspective on motor behavior.

[1]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Kinematics of pointing movements made in a virtual versus a physical 3-dimensional environment in healthy and stroke subjects. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[3]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Effects of Stereo Viewing Conditions on Distance Perception in Virtual Environments , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[4]  Christopher R France,et al.  The Influence of Pain-Related Fear on Peak Muscle Activity and Force Generation During Maximal Isometric Trunk Exertions , 2008, Spine.

[5]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  J Cholewicki,et al.  Methodological considerations for using inductive sensors (3SPACE ISOTRAK) to monitor 3-D orthopaedic joint motion. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  Christopher R France,et al.  The Effect of Chronic Low Back Pain on Trunk Muscle Activations in Target Reaching Movements With Various Loads , 2007, Spine.

[8]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments , 2009, TAP.

[9]  Ziaul Hasan,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic constraints on arm, trunk, and leg segments in target-reaching movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  S. Walkowski,et al.  Feasibility and Safety of a Virtual Reality Dodgeball Intervention for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[12]  Ziaul Hasan,et al.  Effect of movement speed on limb segment motions for reaching from a standing position , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[14]  T. Metzinger,et al.  Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness , 2007, Science.

[15]  James S Thomas,et al.  Coordination and timing of spine and hip joints during full body reaching tasks. , 2007, Human movement science.

[16]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Enhanced feedback during training in virtual versus real world environments , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[17]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  Christopher R. France,et al.  The relationship between pain-related fear and lumbar flexion during natural recovery from low back pain , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[19]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Michael J. Sullivan,et al.  Pain-related fear predicts reduced spinal motion following experimental back injury , 2012, PAIN®.

[21]  S. Lavender,et al.  Effects of Fear of Movement on Spine Velocity and Acceleration After Recovery From Low Back Pain , 2008, Spine.

[22]  Christopher R France,et al.  Pain-Related Fear Is Associated With Avoidance of Spinal Motion During Recovery From Low Back Pain , 2007, Spine.

[23]  Eliane C Magdalon,et al.  Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Francine Malouin,et al.  A Treadmill and Motion Coupled Virtual Reality System for Gait Training Post-Stroke , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  M.F. Levin,et al.  Comparison of reaching and grasping kinematics in patients with hemiparesis and in healthy controls in virtual and physical environments , 2008, 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[26]  Ágoston Török,et al.  Reference frames in virtual spatial navigation are viewpoint dependent , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  L. S. Tamkei,et al.  Effect of viewing angle on arm reaching while standing in a virtual environment: potential for virtual rehabilitation. , 2010, Acta psychologica.