论文信息 - JVM versus CLR: a comparative study

JVM versus CLR: a comparative study

We present empirical evidence to demonstrate that there is little or no difference between the Java Virtual Machine and the .NET Common Language Runtime, as regards the compilation and execution of object-oriented programs. Then we give details of a case study that proves the superiority of the Common Language Runtime as a target for imperative programming language compilers (in particular GCC).

Jeremy Singer | Jeremy Singer

[1] Jesse Liberty,et al. Programming C , 2001 .

[2] Ken Arnold,et al. The Java programming language (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[3] Bjarne Stroustrup,et al. C++ Programming Language , 1986, IEEE Softw..

[4] Ken Arnold,et al. The Java Programming Language , 1996 .

[5] Robin Milner,et al. Definition of standard ML , 1990 .

[6] John Gough,et al. Implementing Languages Other than Java on the Java Virtual Machine , 2000 .

[7] Jeremy Singer. GCC . NET — a feasibility study , 2003 .

[8] Martin D. Westhead,et al. A benchmark suite for high performance Java , 2000, Concurr. Pract. Exp..

[9] Frank Yellin,et al. The Java Virtual Machine Specification , 1996 .

[10] Norman Ramsey,et al. The design of a resourceable and retargetable binary translator , 1999, Sixth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (Cat. No.PR00303).

[11] K. John Gough. Stacking them up: a comparison of virtual machines , 2001, Proceedings 6th Australasian Computer Systems Architecture Conference. ACSAC 2001.

[12] Serge Lidin,et al. Inside Microsoft .Net Il Assembler , 2002 .

[13] J. Mark Bull,et al. Benchmarking Java against C and Fortran for scientific applications , 2001, JGI '01.

[14] John John Gough,et al. Compiling for the .NET Common Language Runtime , 2001 .

[15] John Gough,et al. Technical Overview of the Common Language Runtime , 2001 .