Extracting photogrammetric ground control from lidar DEMs for change detection

Research has shown the importance of measuring topography for surface change detection and that the use of remote sensing methods is ideal for this application. A prerequisite for measuring change is a historical data‐set that covers the time period of interest. Many remote methods of topographic data collection such as lidar are relatively recent developments and therefore cannot provide records longer than about a decade. Alternatively, aerial photography has been in common use since the early 20th century and archives upwards of 50 years are therefore not uncommon. While photogrammetry is dependent on well distributed, high quality ground control points (GCPs), such data has been successfully applied retroactively. Therefore, contemporary lidar data, which requires little ground‐truth data, should be an ideal source of GCPs for controlling historical aerial photographs. This study aims to evaluate the success with which GCPs can be extracted from a high‐resolution lidar data‐set for controlling aerial photography for digital elevation model (DEM) production. Using a data‐set collected in Upper Wharfedale, northern England, GCPs were measured both by means of a lidar data‐set and by using traditional field‐based methods. The results showed that while the use of lidar‐derived ground control produced a DEM of inferior quality, increasing the number of GCPs used in the model produced results comparable to the GPS‐controlled DEM. These results are significant especially for surface change detection research in remote areas where high quality ground control is difficult to secure.

[1]  R. L. Shreve Movement of water in glaciers , 1972 .

[2]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[3]  M. Bray,et al.  Episodic shingle supply and the modified development of Chesil Beach, England , 1997 .

[4]  J. Hooke,et al.  Prediction of Soft-cliff Retreat with Accelerating Sea-level Rise , 1997 .

[5]  Anne-Marie Nuttall,et al.  Photogrammetry as A Research Tool for Glaciology , 1997 .

[6]  Peter Axelsson,et al.  Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications , 1999 .

[7]  K. Mcguffie,et al.  Assessing simulations of daily temperature and precipitation variability with global climate models for present and enhanced greenhouse climates , 1999 .

[8]  P. Wolf,et al.  Elements of Photogrammetry(with Applications in GIS) , 2000 .

[9]  J. Brasington,et al.  Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel‐bed river using high resolution GPS‐based survey , 2000 .

[10]  S. Lane,et al.  The Measurement of River Channel Morphology Using Digital Photogrammetry , 2000 .

[11]  Dale P. Winebrenner,et al.  Mapping Greenland accumulation rates using observations of thermal emission at 4.5‐cm wavelength , 2001 .

[12]  P. Jones,et al.  Assessing future changes in extreme precipitation over Britain using regional climate model integrations , 2001 .

[13]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Measuring Flume Surfaces for Hydraulics Research Using a Kodak DCS460 , 2001 .

[14]  L. Andreassen,et al.  Using aerial photography to study glacier changes in Norway , 2002, Annals of Glaciology.

[15]  H. Farid,et al.  Hillslope Topography from Unconstrained Photographs , 2002 .

[16]  Robert N. Swift,et al.  Aircraft laser altimetry measurement of elevation changes of the greenland ice sheet: technique and accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[17]  John C. Russ,et al.  Image Processing Handbook, Fourth Edition , 2002 .

[18]  T. N. Palmer,et al.  Quantifying the risk of extreme seasonal precipitation events in a changing climate , 2002, Nature.

[19]  J. Chandler,et al.  Evaluation of Lidar and Medium Scale Photogrammetry for Detecting Soft‐Cliff Coastal Change , 2002 .

[20]  S. Lane,et al.  Remote survey of large-scale braided, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis , 2003 .

[21]  J. Moore,et al.  Changes in geometry and subglacial drainage of Midre Lovénbreen, Svalbard, determined from digital elevation models , 2003 .

[22]  Joseph Revelli,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook, 4th Edition , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[23]  S. Lane,et al.  Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel‐bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing , 2003 .

[24]  Ding Yongjian,et al.  Causes of glacier change in the source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers on the Tibetan Plateau , 2003, Journal of Glaciology.

[25]  J. Brasington,et al.  Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport , 2003 .

[26]  J. Pelletier Drainage basin evolution in the Rainfall Erosion Facility: dependence on initial conditions , 2003 .

[27]  A. F. Habib,et al.  ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES FOR UTILIZING LIDAR DATA AS A SOURCE OF CONTROL INFORMATION FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MODELS , 2004 .

[28]  Curt H. Davis,et al.  Elevation change of the Antarctic ice sheet, 1995-2000, from ERS-2 satellite radar altimetry , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  W. Krabill,et al.  Elevation changes measured on Svalbard glaciers and ice caps from airborne laser data , 2005, Annals of Glaciology.

[30]  M. Bauer,et al.  Airborne laser scanning for riverbank erosion assessment , 2005 .

[31]  Paul Cross,et al.  STATISTICAL CONCEPTS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND SURVEYING , 2006 .

[32]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Investigating the effects of DEM error in scaling analysis. , 2007 .