Monitoring Soil Moisture Drought over Northern High Latitudes from Space

Mapping drought from space using, e.g., surface soil moisture (SSM), has become viable in the last decade. However, state of the art SSM retrieval products suffer from very poor coverage over northern latitudes. In this study, we propose an innovative drought indicator with a wider spatial and temporal coverage than that obtained from satellite SSM retrievals. We evaluate passive microwave brightness temperature observations from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite as a surrogate drought metric, and introduce a Standardized Brightness Temperature Index (STBI). We compute the STBI by fitting a Gaussian distribution using monthly brightness temperature data from SMOS; the normal assumption is tested using the Shapior-Wilk test. Our results indicate that the assumption of normally distributed brightness temperature data is valid at the 0.05 significance level. The STBI is validated against drought indices from a land surface data assimilation system (LDAS-Monde), two satellite derived SSM indices, one from SMOS and one from the ESA CCI soil moisture project and a standardized precipitation index based on in situ data from the European Climate Assessment & Dataset (ECA&D) project. When comparing the temporal dynamics of the STBI to the LDAS-Monde drought index we find that it has equal correlation skill to that of the ESA CCI soil moisture product (0.71). However, in addition the STBI provides improved spatial coverage because no masking has been applied over regions with dense boreal forest. Finally, we evaluate the STBI in a case study of the 2018 Nordic drought. The STBI is found to provide improved spatial and temporal coverage when compared to the drought index created from satellite derived SSM over the Nordic region. Our results indicate that when compared to drought indices from precipitation data and a land data assimilation system, the STBI is qualitatively able to capture the 2018 drought onset, severity and spatial extent. We did see that the STBI was unable to detect the 2018 drought recovery for some areas in the Nordic countries. This false drought detection is likely linked to the recovery of vegetation after the drought, which causes an increase in the passive microwave brightness temperature, hence the STBI shows a dry anomaly instead of normal conditions, as seen for the other drought indices. We argue that the STBI could provide additional information for drought monitoring in regions where the SSM retrieval problem is not well defined. However, it then needs to be accompanied by a vegetation index to account for the recovery of the vegetation which could cause false drought detection.

[1]  E. Wood,et al.  Anthropogenic warming exacerbates European soil moisture droughts , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[2]  J. Mahfouf,et al.  The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme , 1996 .

[3]  Irving I. Gringorten,et al.  A plotting rule for extreme probability paper , 1963 .

[4]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  Monitoring of water and carbon fluxes using a land data assimilation system: a case study for southwestern France , 2010 .

[6]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  SMOS-IC: An Alternative SMOS Soil Moisture and Vegetation Optical Depth Product , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[7]  L. Isaksen,et al.  A simplified Extended Kalman Filter for the global operational soil moisture analysis at ECMWF , 2013 .

[8]  Lifeng Luo,et al.  Monitoring and predicting the 2007 U.S. drought , 2007 .

[9]  M. Palecki,et al.  THE DROUGHT MONITOR , 2002 .

[10]  E. Wood,et al.  A simulated soil moisture based drought analysis for the United States , 2004 .

[11]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Developing a drought-monitoring index for the contiguous US using SMAP , 2018, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[13]  F. Bouyssel,et al.  A comparison of two off‐line soil analysis schemes for assimilation of screen level observations , 2009 .

[14]  C. Albergel,et al.  Assimilation of Soil Wetness Index and Leaf Area Index into the ISBA-A-gs land surface model: grassland case study , 2011 .

[15]  Y. Kerr,et al.  L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB) Model: Description and calibration against experimental data sets over crop fields , 2007 .

[16]  W. Wagner,et al.  Evaluation of the ESA CCI soil moisture product using ground-based observations , 2015 .

[17]  Amir AghaKouchak,et al.  A Vantage from Space Can Detect Earlier Drought Onset: An Approach Using Relative Humidity , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Alina Barbu,et al.  The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes , 2012 .

[19]  Alina Barbu,et al.  Sequential assimilation of satellite-derived vegetation and soil moisture products using SURFEX_v8.0: LDAS-Monde assessment over the Euro-Mediterranean area , 2017 .

[20]  M. Drusch,et al.  Comparing ERA-40-based L-band brightness temperatures with skylab observations: a calibration/validation study using the community microwave emission model. , 2009 .

[21]  N. McDowell,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 1-2013 A Remotely Sensed Global Terrestrial Drought Severity Index , 2017 .

[22]  Xing Yuan,et al.  Microwave remote sensing of short‐term droughts during crop growing seasons , 2015 .

[23]  P. Jones,et al.  A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950-2006 , 2008 .

[24]  Adam Emmer.  Geographies and Scientometrics of Research on Natural Hazards , 2018, Geosciences.

[25]  Yann Kerr,et al.  AMMA Land Surface Model Intercomparison experiment coupled to the Community Microwave Emission Model: ALMIP-MEM , 2009 .

[26]  E. Njoku,et al.  Passive microwave remote sensing of soil moisture , 1996 .

[27]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Observations of soil moisture using a passive and active low-frequency microwave airborne sensor during SGP99 , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  ESA CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding : State-of-the art and future directions , 2017 .

[29]  Yongjun Zheng,et al.  Monitoring and Forecasting the Impact of the 2018 Summer Heatwave on Vegetation , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Lukas Gudmundsson,et al.  Regional scaling of annual mean precipitation and water availability with global temperature change , 2017 .

[31]  João Paulo Ramos Teixeira,et al.  Remote sensing of drought: Progress, challenges and opportunities , 2015 .

[32]  P. Jones,et al.  Global warming and changes in drought , 2014 .

[33]  Gabrielle De Lannoy,et al.  Assimilation of SMOS brightness temperatures or soil moisture retrievals into a land surface model , 2016 .

[34]  Amir AghaKouchak,et al.  A generalized framework for deriving nonparametric standardized drought indicators , 2015 .

[35]  Laurent Bertino,et al.  An Evaluation of the EnKF vs. EnOI and the Assimilation of SMAP, SMOS and ESA CCI Soil Moisture Data over the Contiguous US , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[36]  Andrew S. Jones,et al.  A Microwave Satellite Observational Operator for Variational Data Assimilation of Soil Moisture , 2004 .

[37]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  An interactive vegetation SVAT model tested against data from six contrasting sites , 1998 .