A REVIEW OF BIOMASS INTEGRATED-GASIFIER/GAS TURBINE COMBINED CYCLE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION IN SUGARCANE INDUSTRIES, WITH AN ANALYSIS FOR CUBA

Biomass integrated-gasifier/gas turbine combined cycle (BIG/GTCC) systems will be capable of producing up to twice as much electricity per unit of biomass consumed and are expected to have lower capital investment requirements per kW of capacity than condensing-extraction steam turbine (CEST) systems, the present-day commercial technology for electricity production from biomass. The significant levels of biomass available as by-products of sugarcane-processing offer a potentially attractive application for BIG/GTCC systems. We review BIG/GTCC designs and ongoing demonstration and commercial projects and present estimates of the performance of two different BIG/GTCC plant configurations integrated into sugar or sugar-and-ethanol factories. Because of the importance of operating a cogeneration facility the year round in order to achieve attractive economics, we present estimates of the availability of and collection cost for sugarcane trash (tops and leaves) as a fuel supplementary to bagasse. We present estimated costs for electricity generated by commercially mature BIG/GTCC systems using sugarcane-biomass for fuel in a Southeast Brazilian context. The electricity costs are prospectively competitive with CEST-generated electricity, which motivates our analysis of how many BIG/GTCC units might need building (and at what cost) in order to reduce capital costs to competitive levels. We conclude with an assessment of the potential impacts on the Cuban energy sector of the introduction of BIG/GTCC cogeneration systems in that country’s sugarcane industry. Cuba’s high per-capita production of sugarcane and its heavy dependence on oil for energy provide attractive conditions for a large-scale energy-from-sugarcane program.

[1]  Margaret K. Mann,et al.  Cost and performance analysis of biomass-based integrated gasification combined-cycle (BIGCC) power systems , 1996 .

[2]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Biomass-Gasifier/Aeroderivative Gas Turbine Combined Cycles: Part B—Performance Calculations and Economic Assessment , 1994 .

[3]  J. Moreira.  Sugarcane for energy – recent results and progress in Brazil , 2000 .

[4]  Eric D. Larson,et al.  Biomass gasifier gas turbine power generating technology , 1996 .

[5]  S. J. Hassuani,et al.  Sugar cane residues for power generation in the sugar/ethanol mills in Brazil , 2001 .

[6]  T. Elliott,et al.  Brazilian biomass power demonstration project , 1994 .

[7]  Alex G. Alexander,et al.  The energy cane alternative , 1985 .

[8]  Paulino López Guzmán,et al.  Heat and power cogeneration at a Cuban sugar mill based on bagasse and trash as fuel: the “Héctor Molina” project , 2000 .

[9]  L. Waldheim,et al.  Update on the Progress of the Brazilian Wood BIG-GT Demonstration Project , 2001 .

[10]  F. Parson,et al.  New bern biomass to energy project Phase I: Feasibility study , 1995 .

[11]  E. Carpentieri,et al.  The introduction of BIG-GT technology – possible future uses in Northeast Brazil , 2000 .

[12]  Jm Ogden,et al.  Steam economy and cogeneration in cane sugars factories , 1990 .

[13]  Charles E. Neilson,et al.  LM2500 gas turbine fuel nozzle design and combustion test evaluation and emission results with simulated gasified wood product fuels , 1999 .

[14]  Jefferson W. Tester,et al.  Energy and the environment in the 21st century , 1991 .

[15]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .