Modulation of current through a nanopore induced by a charged globule: Implications for DNA-docking

The passage of DNA through a nanopore can be effectively decomposed into two distinct phases, docking and actual translocation. In experiments each phase is characterized by a distinct current signature which allows the discrimination of the two events. However, at low voltages a clear distinction of the two phases is lost. By using numerical simulations we clarify how the current signature associated to the docking events depends on the applied voltage. The simulations show that at small voltage the DNA globule enhances the pore conductance due to an enrichment of charge carriers. At high voltage, the globule drains substantial charge carriers from the pore region, thereby reducing the overall conductance. The results provide a new interpretation to the experimental data on conductance and show how docking interferes with the translocation signal, of potential interest for sequencing applications.

[1]  D. Belashchenko Computer simulation of liquid metals , 2013 .

[2]  F. Cecconi,et al.  Protein translocation in narrow pores: inferring bottlenecks from native structure topology. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  S. Melchionna,et al.  Effective electrodiffusion equation for non-uniform nanochannels. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[4]  S. Melchionna,et al.  Charge transport in nanochannels: a molecular theory. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  Simon Mead Prion , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[6]  S. Melchionna,et al.  Electro-osmotic flows under nanoconfinement: A self-consistent approach , 2011, 1107.4883.

[7]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Hybrid pore formation by directed insertion of α-haemolysin into solid-state nanopores. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[8]  G. Schmid The Nature of Nanotechnology , 2010 .

[9]  M. Chinappi,et al.  Intrinsic slip on hydrophobic self-assembled monolayer coatings , 2010 .

[10]  Byeongdu Lee,et al.  Erratum: Structure, dynamics, and power conversion efficiency correlations in a new low bandgap polymer: PCBM solar cell (The Journal of Physical Chemistry B) , 2010 .

[11]  Massimo Bernaschi,et al.  MUPHY: A parallel MUlti PHYsics/scale code for high performance bio-fluidic simulations , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[12]  S. Melchionna,et al.  Mass flux through asymmetric nanopores: Microscopic versus hydrodynamic motion. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Rashid Bashir,et al.  DNA-Mediated Fluctuations in Ionic Current through Silicon Oxide Nanopore Channels. Nano Lett., 4(8), 1551-1556 , 2004 .

[14]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.

[15]  D. Branton,et al.  Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Journal of Chemical Physics , 1932, Nature.

[17]  P. Drummond,et al.  Computer Physics Communications , 2001 .

[18]  E. Hall,et al.  The nature of biotechnology. , 1988, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[19]  R. Williams,et al.  Journal of American Chemical Society , 1979 .

[20]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[21]  Arrow,et al.  The Physics of Fluids , 1958, Nature.

[22]  N. H. Beebe Multiscale Modeling & Simulation , 2022 .