IPBES and Biodiversity Expertise: Regional, Gender, and Disciplinary Balance in the Composition of the Interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is an expert institution expected to transform the governance of biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES expands on previous initiatives and positions itself as a knowledge-policy interface open to different ways of knowing biodiversity. In this contribution, we analyze how the principles of regional, gender, and disciplinary balance that were adopted by IPBES have been applied to the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP): the body of experts responsible for the scientific and technical functions of IPBES and embedded in its knowledge-making practices. In doing so, we compare the selection of the interim MEP in 2013 with the new MEP in 2015 and find a small improvement in gender and disciplinary balance that varies across the United Nations regional groupings. According to the ambition of IPBES, there is significant room for improvement, but "opening-up" expertise in an intergovernmental setting proves challenging.

[1]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Conservation policy: Listen to the voices of experience , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Thomas Koetz,et al.  Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2012, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[3]  P. Levin,et al.  Cultural Dimensions of Socioecological Systems: Key Connections and Guiding Principles for Conservation in Coastal Environments , 2014 .

[4]  B. Agarwal.  Gender and green governance , 2010 .

[5]  H. Mooney,et al.  IPBES: Biodiversity panel should play by rules , 2014, Nature.

[6]  Ryan Holifield,et al.  Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions and representation , 2012 .

[7]  D. Rocheleau,et al.  GENDER AND BIODIVERSITY: A FEMINIST POLITICAL ECOLOGY PERSPECTIVE , 1995 .

[8]  A. Duraiappah,et al.  The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: opportunities for the social sciences , 2011 .

[9]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Role of the research standpoint in integrating global-scale and local-scale research , 2001 .

[10]  Anne Larigauderie,et al.  Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise , 2014 .

[12]  K. Asher.  Gender and Green Governance: The Political Economy of Women′s Presence Within and Beyond Community Forestry , 2014, Conservation and Society.

[13]  Mark Whitehead,et al.  Changing the intellectual climate , 2014 .

[14]  Claire Waterton,et al.  Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with” , 2013 .

[15]  Shardul Agrawala,et al.  Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 1998 .

[16]  Y. Ezrahi,et al.  The descent of Icarus : science and the transformation of contemporary democracy , 1990 .