Stress “deafness” in a Language with Fixed Word Stress: An ERP Study on Polish

The aim of the present contribution was to examine the factors influencing the prosodic processing in a language with predictable word stress. For Polish, a language with fixed penultimate stress but several well-defined exceptions, difficulties in the processing and representation of prosodic information have been reported (e.g., Peperkamp and Dupoux, 2002). The present study utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the factors influencing prosodic processing in Polish. These factors are (i) the predictability of stress and (ii) the prosodic structure in terms of metrical feet. Polish native speakers were presented with correctly and incorrectly stressed Polish words and instructed to judge the correctness of the perceived stress patterns. For some stress violations, an early negativity was found which was interpreted as a reflection of an error-detection mechanism. In addition, exceptional stress patterns (=antepenultimate stress) and post-lexical (=initial) stress evoked a task-related positivity effect (P300) whose amplitude and latency is correlated with the degree of anomaly and deviation from an expectation. In contrast, violations involving the default (=penultimate stress) did not produce such an effect. This asymmetrical result is interpreted to reflect that Polish native speakers are less sensitive to the default pattern than to the exceptional or post-lexical patterns. Behavioral results are orthogonal to the electrophysiological results showing that Polish speakers had difficulties to reject any kind of stress violation. Thus, on a meta-linguistic level Polish speakers appeared to be stress-“deaf” for any kind of stress manipulation, whereas the neural reactions differentiate between the default and lexicalized patterns.

[1]  Ulrike Domahs,et al.  Experimental evidence for optimal and minimal metrical structure of German word prosody , 2009 .

[2]  C. Drake,et al.  The “Ticktock” of Our Internal Clock , 2003, Psychological science.

[3]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[4]  B. Hayes Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies , 1995 .

[5]  A. Prince,et al.  On stress and linguistic rhythm , 1977 .

[6]  E. C. Hills,et al.  Manual de Pronunciacion Espanola , 1926 .

[7]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Why Pitch Sensitivity Matters: Event-Related Potential Evidence of Metric and Syntactic Violation Detection Among Spanish Late Learners of German , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  A. Friederici,et al.  Brain Indices of Music Processing: Nonmusicians are Musical , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Wiese,et al.  Processing (un-)predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish , 2013 .

[12]  J. Mehler,et al.  A destressing deafness in French , 1997 .

[13]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[15]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The processing of German word stress: evidence for the prosodic hierarchy* , 2008, Phonology.

[16]  R. Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A robust method to study stress "deafness". , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Johannes Knaus,et al.  THE PROCESSING OF WORD STRESS: EEG STUDIES ON TASK-RELATED COMPONENTS , 2007 .

[19]  Briony Williams,et al.  5. The phonetic manifestation of word stress , 1999 .

[20]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[21]  S. Kotz,et al.  Event-related potential responses to metric violations: rules versus meaning , 2010, Neuroreport.

[22]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Did you get the beat? Late proficient French-German learners extract strong–weak patterns in tonal but not in linguistic sequences , 2011, NeuroImage.

[23]  Roni Y. Granot,et al.  Differential Brain Response to Metrical Accents in Isochronous Auditory Sequences , 2005 .

[24]  Mireille Besson,et al.  Musicians and the Metric Structure of Words , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[26]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A typological study of stress ‘deafness’ , 2002 .