Improving practice: Child protection as a systems problem

Abstract This paper argues for treating the task of improving the child protection services as a systems problem and for adopting the system-focused approach to investigating errors that has been developed in areas of medicine and engineering where safety is a high priority. It outlines how this approach differs from the traditional way of examining errors and how it leads to different types of solutions. Traditional inquiries tend to stop once human error has been found, whereas a systems approach treats human error as the starting point and examines the whole context in which the operator was working to see how this impacted on their ability to perform well. The article outlines some factors that seem particularly problematic and worthy of closer analysis in current child protection services. A better understanding of the factors that are adversely effecting practitioners' level of performance offers the potential for identifying more effective solutions. These typically take the form of modifying the tasks so that they make more realistic and feasible demands on human cognitive and emotional abilities.

[1]  E. Munro,et al.  Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. , 1999, Child abuse & neglect.

[2]  Michael Power,et al.  The audit society : rituals of verification , 1997 .

[3]  S. Mackenzie,et al.  Critical incidents in the intensive therapy unit , 1991, The Lancet.

[4]  J. E. Myers,et al.  The Backlash: Child Protection Under Fire , 1994 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  E. Munro Effective Child Protection , 2002 .

[7]  E. Munro The Impact of Audit on Social Work Practice , 2004 .

[8]  E. Farmer,et al.  Child protection practice : private risks and public remedies : a study of decision-making, intervention and outcome in child protection work , 1995 .

[9]  Robert Pool,et al.  Beyond Engineering: How Society Shapes Technology , 1997 .

[10]  Ronald C. Hughes,et al.  Issues in Risk Assessment in Child Protective Services , 2006 .

[11]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[12]  Vernon L. Quinsey,et al.  Violent Recidivism of Mentally Disordered Offenders , 1993 .

[13]  J. Baron Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[14]  A. Rushton,et al.  The Supervision of Child Protection Work , 1996 .

[15]  J. Krysik,et al.  The Empirical Validation of an Instrument to Predict Risk of Recidivism Among Juvenile Offenders , 2002 .

[16]  David Woods,et al.  Behind human error : cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight : state-of-the-art report , 1994 .

[17]  Robert Adams,et al.  Quality Social Work , 1998 .

[18]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[19]  Charles Gene Lyle,et al.  Looks can be deceiving: Using a risk assessment instrument to evaluate the out-comes of child protection services , 2000 .

[20]  D. DePanfilis Review of IAIU Investigations of Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect in DYFS Out-of-Home Care Settings in New Jersey , 2003 .

[21]  J Rasmussen,et al.  Human error and the problem of causality in analysis of accidents. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  Victoria Climbié,et al.  The Victoria Climbié Inquiry , 2002 .

[23]  C. Schwalbe,et al.  Re-visioning risk assessment for human service decision making , 2004 .

[24]  D. English,et al.  Risk assessment as a practice method in child protective services. , 1994, Child welfare.

[25]  C. Hood,et al.  Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates on Risk Management , 1996 .

[26]  J. Cooper,et al.  An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection. , 1984 .

[27]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[28]  J. Waldfogel,et al.  The future of child protection , 1998 .