Differences in the activation of m. biceps brachii in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions

SummaryWe have compared muscle activation in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions. Specific attention has been given to the contribution of the two force-grading mechanisms, the recruitment of motor units and the modulation of firing frequency in motor units that have already been recruited. The recruitment order of the m. biceps motor units under study was the same during isometric contractions and slow isotonic movements. However, the recruitment thresholds of the m. biceps units were considerably lower for both isotonic flexion and extension movements, even at velocities as low as 2 deg/s, than for isometric contractions. Furthermore, firing frequency at recruitment was found to depend on the motor task: at recruitment the motoneurone starts firing with a higher firing frequency during isotonic flexion movements and a lower firing frequency during isotonic extension movements than during isometric contractions. Two main conclusions can be drawn from these results. First of all, the concept of one single activation parameter (total synaptic drive?) cannot account for the motor-unit behaviour observed during our experiments: the relative contribution of the two forcegrading mechanisms is different for different tasks. Secondly, the distribution of activity among flexor motoneurone pools is different for isometric contractions and isotonic movements.

[1]  C. Romano,et al.  Reflex excitability of human soleus motoneurones during voluntary shortening or lengthening contractions. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  P Bawa,et al.  Voluntary and reflexive recruitment of flexor carpi radialis motor units in humans. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Jack M. Winters,et al.  Analysis of Fundamental Human Movement Patterns Through the Use of In-Depth Antagonistic Muscle Models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  ter Bm Bart Haar Romeny,et al.  Behaviour of motor units of human arm muscles: differences between slow isometric contraction and relaxation , 1985 .

[5]  C. Gielen,et al.  The contribution of afferent information on position and velocity to the control of slow and fast human forearm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[7]  C. Gielen,et al.  Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  G. Zahalak,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of the Frequency-Response Characteristics of Active Human Skeletal Muscle In Vivo , 1979 .

[9]  R. D'ambrosia,et al.  The EMG-Force Model of Electrically Stimulated Muscle: Dependence on Control Strategy and Predominant Fiber Composition , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Rapid ankle extension during paw shakes: selective recruitment of fast ankle extensors. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Application of the Karhunen-Loève Expansion to Feature Selection and Ordering , 1970, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[12]  C. Gielen,et al.  Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks , 1984, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  E. Godaux,et al.  Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  E. Glaser Separation of Neuronal Activity by Waveform Analysis , 1971 .

[15]  G. Loeb Motoneurone task groups: coping with kinematic heterogeneity. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.