Improving landsat and IRS image classification: evaluation of unsupervised and supervised classification through band ratios and DEM in a mountainous landscape in Nepal.

Modification of the original bands and integration of ancillary data in digital image classification has been shown to improve land use land cover classification accuracy. There are not many studies demonstrating such techniques in the context of the mountains of Nepal. The objective of this study was to explore and evaluate the use of modified band and ancillary data in Landsat and IRS image classification, and to produce a land use land cover map of the Galaudu watershed of Nepal. Classification of land uses were explored using supervised and unsupervised classification for 12 feature sets containing the LandsatMSS, TM and IRS original bands, ratios, normalized difference vegetation index, principal components and a digital elevation model. Overall, the supervised classification method produced higher accuracy than the unsupervised approach. The result from the combination of bands ration 4/3, 5/4 and 5/7 ranked the highest in terms of accuracy (82.86%), while the combination of bands 2, 3 and 4 ranked the lowest (45.29%). Inclusion of DEM as a component band shows promising results.

[1]  T. Frank.  Mapping dominant vegetation communities in the Colorado Rocky Mountain Front Range with Landsat Thematic Mapper and digital terrain data , 1988 .

[2]  K. C. Krishna Bahadur,et al.  Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS : a case of the Upper Nam Wa Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand , 2009 .

[3]  W. G. Rohde,et al.  Mapping wildland resources with digital Landsat and terrain data , 1982 .

[4]  A. Jones,et al.  Use of digital terrain data in the interpretation of SPOT-1 HRV multispectral imagery , 1988 .

[5]  T. Logan,et al.  Improving forest cover classification accuracy from Landsat by incorporating topographic information , 1978 .

[6]  S. A. Briggs,et al.  Fast maximum likelihood classification of remotely-sensed imagery , 1987 .

[7]  K. C. Krishna Bahadur.  Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS: a case of the Upper Nam Wa Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand , 2009 .

[8]  E. Webb,et al.  GIS Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Changes Associated With Community Forestry Implementation in the Middle Hills of Nepal , 2002 .

[9]  T. Tokola,et al.  Use of topographic correction in Landsat TM-based forest interpretation in Nepal , 2001 .

[10]  C. Estreguil,et al.  A GIS based methodology for small scale monitoring of tropical forests—a case study in Sumatra , 1993 .

[11]  Rajendra P. Shrestha,et al.  Application of DEM Data to Landsat Image Classification: Evaluation in a Tropical Wet-Dry Landscape of Thailand , 2000 .

[12]  Mitchel Langford,et al.  Land cover mapping in a tropical hillsides environment: a case study in the Cauca region of Colombia , 1997 .

[13]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[14]  P. Sopp.  Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[15]  E. Webb,et al.  Forest Cover Change, Physiography, Local Economy, and Institutions in a Mountain Watershed in Nepal , 2004, Environmental management.

[16]  David G. Goodenough,et al.  Slope-Aspect Effects in Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery , 1985 .

[17]  K. S. Rao,et al.  Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of central Himalaya, India , 2001 .

[18]  D. Vanderzee,et al.  Sensitivity of ISODATA to changes in sampling procedures and processing parameters when applied to AVHRR time-series NDV1 data , 1995 .

[19]  L. Janssen,et al.  Integrating topographic data with remote sensing for land-cover classification. , 1990 .

[20]  S. E. Franklin,et al.  Terrain analysis from digital patterns in geomorphometry and Landsat MSS spectral response , 1987 .

[21]  D. Peddle,et al.  Image texture processing and data integration for surface pattern discrimination , 1991 .

[22]  Sunil Nautiyal,et al.  Patterns and ecological implications of agricultural land-use changes: a case study from central Himalaya, India , 2004 .

[23]  José Luis Palacio-Prieto,et al.  Improving spectral results in a GTS context , 1996 .

[24]  Jefferson Fox,et al.  LAND USE AND LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS IN NORTHERN THAILAND: ASSESSING CHANGE IN THREE UPLAND WATERSHEDS SINCE 1954 , 1994 .

[25]  Harald Johnsen,et al.  DEM corrected ERS-1 SAR data for snow monitoring , 1996 .

[26]  W. Cibula,et al.  Use of topographic and climatological models in a geographical data base to improve Landsat MSS classification for Olympic National Park , 1987 .

[27]  D. Civco.  Topographic normalization of landsat thematic mapper digital imagery , 1989 .

[28]  Steven E. Franklin.  Topographic context of satellite spectral response , 1990 .

[29]  B. Kapralos,et al.  I An Introduction to Digital Image Processing , 2022 .

[30]  Stephen J. Walsh.  Variability of Landsat MSS spectral responses of forests in relation to stand and site characteristics , 1987 .

[31]  S. Ringrose,et al.  The development of image processing techniques to assess changes in green vegetation cover along a climatic gradient through Northern Territory, Australia , 1994 .

[32]  J. Kammerbauer,et al.  Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical watershed in the hillside region of central Honduras , 1999 .

[33]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .