Evaluating environmental benefits of low-cost biogas digesters in small-scale farms in Colombia: A life cycle assessment.

The aim of this study was to assess the environmental benefits of implementing low-cost digesters in small-scale farms in Colombia by using the LCA methodology. Four scenarios were taken into account considering two small-scale farms located in different areas: two (previous) scenarios where manure was stored in a manure pit and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) was used for cooking; and two (current) scenarios where manure is treated in low-cost digesters, the digestate replaces the synthetic fertiliser and the biogas is used for cooking replacing the LPG. Results showed that digesters implementation considerably reduced (by up to 80%) potential environmental impacts associated with manure handling, fuel and fertiliser use in the small-scale Colombian farms. This was mainly due to the reduction of LPG and synthetic fertiliser use which were replaced by biogas and digestate. An economic assessment showed that low-cost digesters reduced expenses associated with cooking fuel and fertiliser purchase by 80%.

[1]  E. Aguilera,et al.  Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review , 2014, Global change biology.

[2]  L. S. Jensen,et al.  Small-scale household biogas digesters: An option for global warming mitigation or a potential climate bomb? , 2014 .

[3]  S. Ryding.  ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[4]  L. Hamelin,et al.  Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy--a life cycle perspective. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Faqi Wu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of large-scale and household biogas plants in northwest China , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Co-digestion of rice straw and cow dung to supply cooking fuel and fertilizers in rural India: Impact on human health, resource flows and climate change. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Laia Ferrer-Martí,et al.  Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of guinea pig manure in low-cost tubular digesters at high altitude. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Dominique Guyonnet,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. , 2012, Waste management.

[9]  Ivet Ferrer,et al.  Technical, economic and environmental assessment of household biogas digesters for rural communities , 2014 .

[10]  Sarina J. Ergas,et al.  Review of small-scale tubular anaerobic digesters treating livestock waste in the developing world , 2016 .

[11]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Health and climate benefits of cookstove replacement options , 2011 .

[12]  I. Ferrer,et al.  A multi-criteria decision support tool for the assessment of household biogas digester programmes in rural areas. A case study in Peru , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[13]  L. Castro,et al.  Low cost digester monitoring under realistic conditions: Rural use of biogas and digestate quality. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[14]  V. Joshi,et al.  GREENHOUSE GASES FROM SMALL-SCALE COMBUSTION DEVICES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: PHASE IIA Household Stoves in India , 2000 .

[15]  C Sharma,et al.  Methane and nitrous oxide emission from bovine manure management practices in India. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[16]  Shefali Sharma,et al.  Applicability of Biogas Technology In Rural Development And Green House Gas Mitigation , 2013 .

[17]  I. Ferrer,et al.  Evaluating benefits of low-cost household digesters for rural Andean communities , 2012 .

[18]  Chandra Venkataraman,et al.  The Indian National Initiative for Advanced Biomass Cookstoves: The benefits of clean combustion , 2010 .

[19]  Mohammad J. Taherzadeh,et al.  Household Biogas Digesters—A Review , 2012 .

[20]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[21]  Emissions of greenhouse and non-greenhouse air pollutants from fuel combustion in restaurant industry , 2013, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[22]  Bui Xuan An,et al.  Gas production from pig manure fed at different loading rates to polyethylene tubular biodigesters , 2007 .

[23]  L. S. Jensen,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas Production in Small-scale Household Digesters in Vietnam , 2015, Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences.

[24]  I. Ferrer,et al.  Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: a review , 2016 .

[25]  Anna Garwood.  Network for Biodigesters in Latin America and the Caribbean: Case Studies and Future Recommendations , 2010 .

[26]  Jordi Comas,et al.  Agricultural reuse of the digestate from low-cost tubular digesters in rural Andean communities. , 2011, Waste management.

[27]  Joachim Müller,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of biogas versus dung combustion household cooking systems in developing countries – A case study in Ethiopia , 2017 .

[28]  Laia Ferrer-Martí,et al.  Codigestion of cow and guinea pig manure in low-cost tubular digesters at high altitude. , 2011 .