Understanding the pathways of students with normative attitudes in engineering

Engineering culture has traditionally limited rather than fostered diversity in engineering. This culture serves to limit representation of diverse individuals within engineering and create environments that are detrimental to creativity, problem solving, and productivity. One way to address this issue is to understand how students align themselves with the cultural values of engineering and navigate their pathways through earning their engineering degrees. We present an analysis of ten participants previously identified through attitudinal survey data as belonging to a “normative” attitudinal group of engineering majors. These individuals provide a way to understand students who are attitudinally similar to the accepted norms and practices of what it means to be an engineer. Results indicate the importance of social resource experiences in engineering and on the widely held belief that success in engineering is born out of hard work, consistent with other studies. These findings outline ways in which engineering culture can shape student attitudes and actions towards learning engineering. Understanding this group may provide ways to change engineering culture to be more inclusive for all students. Our research begins to describe particular cultural practices and values to improve the recruitment, training, and retention of a broader population of engineering students.

[1]  Daphna Oyserman,et al.  Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Intervention , 2010, The Counseling psychologist.

[2]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[3]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Increasing the diversity of engineering education – a gender analysis in a PBL context , 2009 .

[4]  Mehmet Sahin,et al.  Effects of Problem-Based Learning on University Students’ Epistemological Beliefs About Physics and Physics Learning and Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Mechanics , 2010 .

[5]  Geoff Potvin,et al.  Intersectionality of Non-normative Identities in the Cultures of Engineering , 2016 .

[6]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The role of the future in student motivation , 1999 .

[7]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Domain-Generality and Domain-Specificity in Personal Epistemology Research: Philosophical and Empirical Reflections in the Development of a Theoretical Framework , 2006 .

[8]  David Hammer,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics , 1994 .

[9]  Denise R. Simmons,et al.  The Role of Social Capital in the Experiences of Hispanic Women Engineering Majors , 2013 .

[10]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[11]  Barbara E. Lovitts,et al.  The Hidden Crisis in Graduate Education: Attrition from Ph.D. Programs. , 2000 .

[12]  Richard T. Serpe,et al.  New Directions in Identity: Theory and Research , 2016 .

[13]  Susan Magun-Jackson,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs of Engineering Students. , 2009 .

[14]  Beverly K. Jaeger,et al.  Successful Students: Smart Or Tough? , 2010 .

[15]  Anne-Marie A. Lerner Gritty students: The effect of perseverance on retention for traditional and nontraditional students , 2013 .

[16]  P. Bourdieu Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[17]  Xiangyun Du,et al.  Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning environment , 2006 .

[18]  T. Oko Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. , 1992 .

[19]  K. González,et al.  Examining the Role of Social Capital in Access to College for Latinas: Toward a College Opportunity Framework , 2003 .

[20]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[21]  Lisa Benson,et al.  Engineering Students' Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future , 2018 .

[22]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  ENGINEERING GENDER−GENDERING ENGINEERING: A CULTURAL MODEL FOR BELONGING , 1999 .

[23]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Elizabeth Godfrey,et al.  Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education , 2010 .

[25]  Reed Stevens,et al.  Engineering as lifestyle and a meritocracy of difficulty: Two pervasive beliefs among engineering students and their possible effects , 2007 .

[26]  Erin A. Cech,et al.  AC 2009-1862: "ENGINEERS WHO HAPPEN TO BE GAY": LESBIAN, GAY, AND BISEXUAL STUDENTS' EXPERIENCES IN ENGINEERING , 2009 .

[27]  Ruth A. Streveler,et al.  Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students' Motivational Values , 2010 .

[28]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  WHO'S PERSISTING IN ENGINEERING? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEMALE AND MALE ASIAN, BLACK, HISPANIC, NATIVE AMERICAN, AND WHITE STUDENTS , 2009 .

[29]  Matthew K. Miller,et al.  Exploring the theoretical social capital ‘‘deficit’’ of first generation college students: Implications for engineering education , 2014 .

[30]  William W. Wulf,et al.  Diversity In Engineering , 2001 .

[31]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study , 2012 .

[32]  Geoff Potvin,et al.  Pushing and Pulling Sara: A Case Study of the Contrasting Influences of High School and University Experiences on Engineering Agency, Identity, and Participation. , 2017 .

[33]  Mitchell E. Daniels Measuring Great Jobs and Great Lives: The Gallup-Purdue Index , 2015, Computer.

[34]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research , 2009, QMiP Bulletin.

[35]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  The grit effect: predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[36]  G.M. Bodner,et al.  First-year engineering students' views of the nature of engineering: implications for engineering programmes , 2016 .

[37]  Adam Kirn,et al.  Engineering Design Self-Efficacy and Project-Based Learning: How Does Active Learning Influence Student Attitudes and Beliefs? , 2016 .

[38]  Cindy E. Foor,et al.  “I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:” Achieving Individual Diversity , 2007 .

[39]  Jennifer M. Case,et al.  Alienation and engagement: exploring students’ experiences of studying engineering , 2007 .

[40]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S) , 2009, Journal of personality assessment.

[41]  G. Moore Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks , 1990 .

[42]  Paul D. Schreuders,et al.  ALL IN THE (ENGINEERING) FAMILY? THE FAMILY OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND OF MEN AND WOMEN ENGINEERING STUDENTS , 2007 .

[43]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .