Variability in lung cancer response to ALK inhibitors cannot be explained by the diversity of ALK fusion variants.
暂无分享,去创建一个
I. S. Sardaryan | E. Imyanitov | E. Filippova | A. Iyevleva | N. Mitiushkina | N. Karaseva | V. Moiseyenko | S. Odintsova | F. Moiseyenko | M. Kholmatov | N. Volkov | S. Orlov | V. Tiurin | A. Lozhkina | N. Levchenko
[1] A. Warth,et al. EML4‐ALK fusion variant V3 is a high‐risk feature conferring accelerated metastatic spread, early treatment failure and worse overall survival in ALK+ non‐small cell lung cancer , 2018, International journal of cancer.
[2] S. Chuai,et al. Response to crizotinib in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancers with different ALK-fusion variants. , 2018, Lung cancer.
[3] Benjamin Solomon,et al. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.
[4] Robyn L. Temple-Smolkin,et al. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. , 2018, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.
[5] P. Hainaut,et al. ALK fusion variants detection by targeted RNA-next generation sequencing and clinical responses to crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. , 2018, Lung cancer.
[6] A. Iafrate,et al. Impact of EML4-ALK Variant on Resistance Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[7] Hyun-Tae Shin,et al. Molecular breakdown: a comprehensive view of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐rearranged non‐small cell lung cancer , 2017, The Journal of pathology.
[8] R. Bayliss,et al. EML4-ALK Variants: Biological and Molecular Properties, and the Implications for Patients , 2017, Cancers.
[9] Gregory Riely,et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2017, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.
[10] K. Park,et al. Differential protein stability and clinical responses of EML4-ALK fusion variants to various ALK inhibitors in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[11] H. Shim,et al. Clinical outcomes in ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas according to ALK fusion variants , 2016, Journal of Translational Medicine.
[12] Y. Yatabe,et al. Differential Crizotinib Response Duration Among ALK Fusion Variants in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[13] Yi-long Wu,et al. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Variants and the Percentage of ALK-Positive Tumor Cells and the Efficacy of Crizotinib in Advanced NSCLC. , 2016, Clinical lung cancer.
[14] D. Fennell,et al. Molecular mechanisms that underpin EML4-ALK driven cancers and their response to targeted drugs , 2016, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[15] A. Sokolenko,et al. Novel ALK fusion partners in lung cancer. , 2015, Cancer letters.
[16] R. Bayliss,et al. Microtubule association of EML proteins and the EML4-ALK variant 3 oncoprotein require an N-terminal trimerization domain. , 2015, The Biochemical journal.
[17] F. López-Ríos,et al. The anaplastic lymphoma kinase testing conundrum , 2015, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.
[18] D. Fennell,et al. Crystal structure of EML1 reveals the basis for Hsp90 dependence of oncogenic EML4-ALK by disruption of an atypical β-propeller domain , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[19] R. Pazdur,et al. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval: Crizotinib for Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer That Is Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.
[20] E. Imyanitov,et al. Detection of EGFR mutations and EML4‐ALK rearrangements in lung adenocarcinomas using archived cytological slides , 2013, Cancer cytopathology.
[21] K. Prabhash,et al. Crizotinib: A comprehensive review , 2013, South Asian journal of cancer.
[22] R. Rosell,et al. Targeting EML4-ALK driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2013, Translational lung cancer research.
[23] Jeffrey W. Clark,et al. Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.
[24] Roman K. Thomas,et al. Differential Protein Stability and ALK Inhibitor Sensitivity of EML4-ALK Fusion Variants , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.
[25] Y. Yatabe,et al. A Screening Method for the ALK Fusion Gene in NSCLC , 2012, Front. Oncol..
[26] Jeffrey W. Clark,et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[27] P. Jänne,et al. The biology and treatment of EML4-ALK non-small cell lung cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.
[28] Laura A. Sullivan,et al. Global Survey of Phosphotyrosine Signaling Identifies Oncogenic Kinases in Lung Cancer , 2007, Cell.
[29] Shinji Yamazaki,et al. Cytoreductive antitumor activity of PF-2341066, a novel inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase and c-Met, in experimental models of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
[30] H. Aburatani,et al. Identification of the transforming EML4–ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer , 2007, Nature.
[31] Shinji Yamazaki,et al. An orally available small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PF-2341066, exhibits cytoreductive antitumor efficacy through antiproliferative and antiangiogenic mechanisms. , 2007, Cancer research.