Sampling and Probe Methods – An Algorithmical View

Inverse scattering problems are concerned with the reconstruction of objects and parameter functions from the knowledge of scattered waves. Today, basically three different categories of methods for the treatment of the full nonlinear scattering problem are known: iterative methods, decomposition methods and sampling/probe methods. Sampling and probe methods have been proposed to detect the unknown scatterer for example in cases when the physical properties are not known or not given in a parametrized modell. A number of different approaches have been suggested over the last years. We will give a survey about these methods and explain the main ideas from an algorithmical point of view. We will group and describe the methods and discuss some relations to ideas which have been developed in the framework of impedance tomography. First, we will study the probe method of Ikehata and the singular sources method of Potthast. We show that these methods are closely related and basically form one unit with two different realizations. The second part is concerned with the range test of Potthast, Sylvester and Kusiak, the linear sampling method of Colton and Kirsch and the factorization method of Kirsch. These methods are founded on similar ideas testing the range of operators for reconstruction. In the final part we study the no response test of Luke and Potthast and the enclosure method of Ikehata. We will see that the enclosure method can be considered as a particular choice of the probing function for the no response test. These two methods are closely related and form two extremes for probing a scatterer with specially constructed waves.

[1]  Joe Coyle,et al.  Locating the support of objects contained in a two-layered background medium in two dimensions , 2000 .

[2]  David Colton,et al.  The simple method for solving the electromagnetic inverse scattering problem: the case of TE polarized waves , 1998 .

[3]  A. Nachman,et al.  Global uniqueness for a two-dimensional inverse boundary value problem , 1996 .

[4]  Masaru Ikehata,et al.  On reconstruction in the inverse conductivity problem with one measurement , 2000, 1902.05182.

[5]  Roland Potthast,et al.  A fast new method to solve inverse scattering problems , 1996 .

[6]  Masaru Ikehata,et al.  RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SHAPE OF THE INCLUSION BY BOUNDARY MEASUREMENTS , 1998 .

[7]  R. Robertson,et al.  Boundary identifiability of residual stress via the Dirichlet to Neumann map , 1997 .

[8]  Victor Isakov Stability estimates for obstacles in inverse scattering , 1992 .

[9]  Masaru Ikehata,et al.  Reconstruction of an obstacle from the scattering amplitude at a fixed frequency , 1998 .

[10]  Victor Isakov New stability results for soft obstacles in inverse scattering , 1993 .

[11]  Peter Monk,et al.  Recent Developments in Inverse Acoustic Scattering Theory , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[12]  A. Kirsch The MUSIC-algorithm and the factorization method in inverse scattering theory for inhomogeneous media , 2002 .

[13]  Gen Nakamura,et al.  Local determination of conductivity at the boundary from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map , 2001 .

[14]  Andreas Kirsch,et al.  Characterization of the shape of a scattering obstacle using the spectral data of the far field operator , 1998 .

[15]  Masaru Ikehata,et al.  Enclosing a polygonal cavity in a two-dimensional bounded domain from Cauchy data , 1999 .

[16]  Jin Cheng,et al.  Recovery of Boundaries and Types for Multiple Obstacles from the Far-field Pattern , 2005 .

[17]  Gen Nakamura,et al.  Numerical Recovery of Conductivity at the Boundary from the Localized Dirichlet to Neumann Map , 2004, Computing.

[18]  Rainer Kress,et al.  A Sampling Method For An Inverse Boundary Value Problem For Harmonic Vector Fields , 2002 .

[19]  A. B. Abda,et al.  Identification of planar cracks by complete overdetermined data: inversion formulae , 1996 .

[20]  Peter Hähner,et al.  An inverse problem in electrostatics , 1999 .

[21]  Steven Kusiak,et al.  The scattering support , 2003 .

[22]  H. Engl,et al.  Regularization of Inverse Problems , 1996 .

[23]  J. Craggs Applied Mathematical Sciences , 1973 .

[24]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  Numerical method for finding the convex hull of an inclusion in conductivity from boundary measurements , 2000 .

[25]  Rainer Kress,et al.  Uniqueness in inverse obstacle scattering (acoustics) , 1993 .

[26]  Roland Potthast,et al.  Stability estimates and reconstructions in inverse acoustic scattering using singular sources , 2000 .

[27]  R. Kress Linear Integral Equations , 1989 .

[28]  T. Arens,et al.  Why linear sampling works , 2004 .

[29]  Roland Potthast,et al.  A 'range test' for determining scatterers with unknown physical properties , 2003 .

[30]  Masaru Ikehata,et al.  Reconstruction of inclusion from boundary measurements , 2018, 1803.02937.

[31]  Andreas Kirsch,et al.  The factorization method in inverse scattering from periodic structures , 2003 .

[32]  Roland Potthast,et al.  The Singular Sources Method for an Inverse Transmission Problem , 2004, Computing.

[33]  Masaru Ikehata,et al.  Reconstruction of the support function for inclusion from boundary measurements , 2000 .

[34]  Roland Potthast,et al.  A new non-iterative singular sources method for the reconstruction of piecewise constant media. , 2004, Numerische Mathematik.

[35]  Masaru Ikehata,et al.  Reconstruction of obstacle from boundary measurements , 1999 .

[36]  Masaru Ikehata A regularized extraction formula in the enclosure method , 2002 .

[37]  David Colton Inverse scattering problem , 1984 .

[38]  Victor Isakov,et al.  On uniqueness in th invese transmission scattering problem , 1990 .

[39]  Peter Monk,et al.  The linear sampling method for solving the electromagnetic inverse medium problem , 2002 .

[40]  A. Nachman,et al.  Reconstructions from boundary measurements , 1988 .

[41]  Takashi Ohe,et al.  A numerical method for finding the convex hull of polygonal cavities using the enclosure method , 2002 .

[42]  Roland Potthast,et al.  The No Response Test---A Sampling Method for Inverse Scattering Problems , 2003, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[43]  Peter Monk,et al.  The Linear Sampling Method for Solving the Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering Problem , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[44]  M. Hanke,et al.  Numerical implementation of two noniterative methods for locating inclusions by impedance tomography , 2000 .

[45]  D. Colton,et al.  A simple method using Morozov's discrepancy principle for solving inverse scattering problems , 1997 .

[46]  R. Kress,et al.  Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory , 1992 .

[47]  Martin Brühl,et al.  Explicit Characterization of Inclusions in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2001, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[48]  D. Isaacson,et al.  An implementation of the reconstruction algorithm of A Nachman for the 2D inverse conductivity problem , 2000 .

[49]  Carlos J. S. Alves,et al.  On the far‐field operator in elastic obstacle scattering , 2002 .

[50]  Klaus Erhard,et al.  A Numerical Study of the Probe Method , 2006, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[51]  J. Sylvester,et al.  Inverse boundary value problems at the boundary—continuous dependence , 1988 .

[52]  Roland Potthast,et al.  A point source method for inverse acoustic and electromagnetic obstacle scattering problems , 1998 .

[53]  Rainer Kress,et al.  UNIQUENESS IN INVERSE OBSTACLE SCATTERING , 2002 .