A spatio temporal spectral framework for plant stress phenotyping

BackgroundRecent advances in high throughput phenotyping have made it possible to collect large datasets following plant growth and development over time, and those in machine learning have made inferring phenotypic plant traits from such datasets possible. However, there remains a dirth of datasets following plant growth under stress conditions along with methods for inferring them using only remotely sensed data, especially under a combination of multiple stress factors such as drought, weeds and nutrient deficiency. Such stress factors and their combinations are commonly encountered during crop production and being able to accurately detect and treat such stress conditions in an automated and timely manner can provide a major boost to farm yields with minimal resource input.ResultsWe present a generic framework for remote plant stress phenotyping that consists of a dataset with spatio-temporal-spectral data following sugarbeet crop growth under optimal, drought, low and surplus nitrogen fertilization, and weed stress conditions, along with a machine learning based methodology for systematically inferring these stress conditions from the remotely measured data. The dataset contains biweekly color images, infra-red stereo image pairs and hyperspectral camera images along with applied treatment parameters and environmental factors like temperature and humidity, collected over two months. We present a plant agnostic methodology for deriving plant trait indicators such as canopy cover, height, hyperspectral reflectance and vegetation indices along with a spectral 3D reconstruction of the plants from the raw data to serve as a benchmark. Additionally, we provide fresh and dry weight measurements for both the above (canopy) and below (beet) ground biomass at the end of the growing period to serve as indicators of expected yield. We further describe a data driven, machine learning based method to infer water, Nitrogen and weed stress using the derived plant trait indicators. We use the plant trait indicators to evaluate 8 different classification approaches from which the best classifier achieved a mean cross validation accuracy of $$\approx$$≈ 93, 76 and 83% for drought, nitrogen and weed stress severity classification respectively. We also show that our multi-modal approach significantly improves classifier performance over using any single modality.ConclusionThe presented framework and dataset can serve as a valuable reference for creating and comparing processing pipelines which extract plant trait indicators and infer prevalent stress factors from remote sensing data under a variety of environments and cropping conditions. These techniques can then be deployed on farm machinery or robots enabling automated, precise and timely corrective interventions for maximising yield.

[1]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Beyond point clouds - 3D mapping and field parameter measurements using UAVs , 2015, 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA).

[2]  N. Munier-Jolain,et al.  Can differences of nitrogen nutrition level among Medicago truncatula genotypes be assessed non-destructively? Probing with a recombinant inbred lines population , 2009, Plant signaling & behavior.

[3]  Josse De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Precision Agriculture Technology and Robotics for Good Agricultural Practices , 2013 .

[4]  R. Siegwart,et al.  Studying Phenotypic Variability in Crops using a Hand-held Sensor Platform , 2015 .

[5]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[6]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[7]  M. Tester,et al.  Expression of the Arabidopsis vacuolar H⁺-pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) improves the shoot biomass of transgenic barley and increases grain yield in a saline field. , 2014, Plant biotechnology journal.

[8]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[9]  Frank Liebisch,et al.  Flourish – A robotic approach for automation in crop management , 2018 .

[10]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Unified temporal and spatial calibration for multi-sensor systems , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Frank Liebisch,et al.  Aerial and Ground Based Sensing of Tolerance to Beet Cyst Nematode in Sugar Beet , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Reducing Multiclass to Binary: A Unifying Approach for Margin Classifiers , 2000, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[14]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularized linear discriminant analysis and its application in microarrays. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[15]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Cyrill Stachniss,et al.  WeedMap: A large-scale semantic weed mapping framework using aerial multispectral imaging and deep neural network for precision farming , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[17]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Utilization of a high-throughput shoot imaging system to examine the dynamic phenotypic responses of a C4 cereal crop plant to nitrogen and water deficiency over time , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[18]  Heiko Hirschmüller,et al.  Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  R. K. Scott,et al.  The Sugar Beet Crop , 1993, World Crop Series.

[20]  Thomas Seidl,et al.  k-Nearest Neighbor Classification , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[21]  Johannes Pfeifer,et al.  Proximal and remote quantification of nitrogen fertilzer demand – A case study in sugar beet , 2017 .

[22]  Tom Duckett,et al.  Agricultural Robotics: The Future of Robotic Agriculture , 2018, UKRAS White Papers.

[23]  G. Meyer,et al.  Verification of color vegetation indices for automated crop imaging applications , 2008 .

[24]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  On field radiometric calibration for multispectral cameras , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[25]  E. Ladewig,et al.  Environmental Situation and Yield Performance of the Sugar Beet Crop in Germany: Heading for Sustainable Development , 2003 .

[26]  Cyrill Stachniss,et al.  An effective classification system for separating sugar beets and weeds for precision farming applications , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[27]  Wei Guo,et al.  Illumination invariant segmentation of vegetation for time series wheat images based on decision tree model , 2013 .

[28]  R. K. Scott,et al.  The effects of time of weed removal on growth and yield of sugar beet , 1979, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[29]  Achim Walter,et al.  The ETH field phenotyping platform FIP: a cable-suspended multi-sensor system. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[30]  K. Chenu,et al.  PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[31]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[32]  S. Y. Sadeghian,et al.  Effect of Water‐Deficit Stress on Germination and Early Seedling Growth in Sugar Beet , 2004 .

[33]  D. Inzé,et al.  Leaf Responses to Mild Drought Stress in Natural Variants of Arabidopsis1[OPEN] , 2015, Plant Physiology.

[34]  M. Tester,et al.  Image-based phenotyping for non-destructive screening of different salinity tolerance traits in rice , 2014, Rice.

[35]  A. Walter,et al.  Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis , 2015, Plant Methods.

[36]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[37]  C. Hoffmann Changes in N Composition of Sugar Beet Varieties in Response to Increasing N Supply , 2005 .

[38]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  weedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[39]  John R. Miller,et al.  Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture , 2002 .

[40]  Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  An explainable deep machine vision framework for plant stress phenotyping , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Jan F. Humplík,et al.  Automated phenotyping of plant shoots using imaging methods for analysis of plant stress responses – a review , 2015, Plant Methods.

[42]  D. Van Der Straeten,et al.  Robotized thermal and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of pepper mild mottle virus infection in Nicotiana benthamiana. , 2006, Plant & cell physiology.

[43]  Wolfgang Heidrich,et al.  CALTag: High Precision Fiducial Markers for Camera Calibration , 2010, VMV.

[44]  Kai Ming Ting,et al.  Confusion Matrix , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[45]  Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  A real-time phenotyping framework using machine learning for plant stress severity rating in soybean , 2017, Plant Methods.

[46]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[47]  W. M. Frasier,et al.  Economic Feasibility of Variable‐Rate Nitrogen Application Utilizing Site‐Specific Management Zones , 2004 .

[48]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[49]  D. Raes,et al.  Yield response of sugar beets to water stress under Western European conditions. , 2010 .

[50]  E. V. Lukina,et al.  Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Cereal Grain Production with Optical Sensing and Variable Rate Application , 2002 .

[51]  Achim Walter,et al.  Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets , 2017, Plant Methods.

[52]  C. Granier,et al.  Multivariate genetic analysis of plant responses to water deficit and high temperature revealed contrasting adaptive strategies , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[53]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  RUSBoost: Improving classification performance when training data is skewed , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[54]  L. Aurdal,et al.  Use of hidden Markov models and phenology for multitemporal satellite image classification: applications to mountain vegetation classification , 2005, International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005..