SspB delivery of substrates for ClpXP proteolysis probed by the design of improved degradation tags.

The ssrA-degradation tag sequence contains contiguous binding sites for the SspB adaptor and the ClpX component of the ClpXP protease. Although SspB normally enhances ClpXP degradation of ssrA-tagged substrates, it inhibits proteolysis under conditions that prevent tethering to ClpX. By increasing the spacing between the protease and adaptor-binding determinants in the ssrA tag, substrates were obtained that displayed improved SspB-mediated binding to and degradation by ClpXP. These extended-tag substrates also showed significantly reduced conditional inhibition but bound SspB normally. Both wild-type and mutant tags showed highly dynamic SspB interactions. Together, these results strongly support delivery models in which SspB and ClpX bind concurrently to the ssrA tag, but also suggest that clashes between SspB and ClpX weaken simultaneous binding. During substrate delivery, this signal masking is overcome by tethering SspB to ClpX, which ensures local concentrations high enough to drive tag engagement. This obstruct-then-stimulate mechanism may have evolved to allow additional levels of regulation and could be a common trait of adaptor-mediated protein degradation.

[1]  T. Baker,et al.  Characterization of a specificity factor for an AAA+ ATPase: assembly of SspB dimers with ssrA-tagged proteins and the ClpX hexamer. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[2]  B. Bukau,et al.  AAA+ proteins and substrate recognition, it all depends on their partner in crime , 2002, FEBS letters.

[3]  T. Baker,et al.  Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[4]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine , 2003, Cell.

[5]  T. Baker,et al.  Structure of a delivery protein for an AAA+ protease in complex with a peptide degradation tag. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[6]  Hisao Kondo,et al.  p47 is a cofactor for p97-mediated membrane fusion , 1997, Nature.

[7]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Regulation of Proteolysis of the Stationary-Phase Sigma Factor RpoS , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  B. Bukau,et al.  Targeted delivery of an ssrA-tagged substrate by the adaptor protein SspB to its cognate AAA+ protein ClpX. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[9]  L. Vinokurov,et al.  Green fluorescent protein purification by organic extraction. , 1998, Protein expression and purification.

[10]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Protein quality control: triage by chaperones and proteases. , 1997, Genes & development.

[11]  T. Baker,et al.  ClpX and MuB interact with overlapping regions of Mu transposase: implications for control of the transposition pathway. , 1997, Genes & development.

[12]  T. Baker,et al.  Distinct peptide signals in the UmuD and UmuD′ subunits of UmuD/D′ mediate tethering and substrate processing by the ClpXP protease , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Boxer,et al.  Ultra-fast excited state dynamics in green fluorescent protein: multiple states and proton transfer. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  S. Gottesman,et al.  ClpX, an alternative subunit for the ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli. Sequence and in vivo activities. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  T. Baker,et al.  A specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Science.

[16]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Bivalent tethering of SspB to ClpXP is required for efficient substrate delivery: a protein-design study. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[17]  T. Baker,et al.  Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Baker,et al.  Energy‐dependent degradation: Linkage between ClpX‐catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis and protein‐substrate processing , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  R. Sauer,et al.  Role of a Peptide Tagging System in Degradation of Proteins Synthesized from Damaged Messenger RNA , 1996, Science.

[20]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The ClpX heat‐shock protein of Escherichia coli, the ATP‐dependent substrate specificity component of the ClpP‐ClpX protease, is a novel molecular chaperone. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[21]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Proteases and their targets in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Annual review of genetics.

[22]  S. Gottesman,et al.  The RssB response regulator directly targets sigma(S) for degradation by ClpXP. , 2001, Genes & development.

[23]  T. Baker,et al.  Effects of protein stability and structure on substrate processing by the ClpXP unfolding and degradation machine , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[24]  Robert E. Cohen,et al.  Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  R. Hengge-aronis,et al.  Regulation of RpoS proteolysis in Escherichia coli: the response regulator RssB is a recognition factor that interacts with the turnover element in RpoS. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  W. Houry,et al.  The N-terminal Zinc Binding Domain of ClpX Is a Dimerization Domain That Modulates the Chaperone Function* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  J. Callis,et al.  CALORIMETRIC, PHOTOMETRIC AND LIFETIME DETERMINATIONS OF FLUORESCENCE YIELDS OF FLUORESCEIN DYES * , 1969, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[28]  A. Fersht.  Enzyme structure and mechanism , 1977 .

[29]  Roger Y. Tsien,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Aequorea victoria Green Fluorescent Protein , 1996, Science.

[30]  P. Bouloc,et al.  Degradation of carboxy-terminal-tagged cytoplasmic proteins by the Escherichia coli protease HflB (FtsH). , 1998, Genes & development.

[31]  Alasdair C Steven,et al.  ClpA and ClpX ATPases bind simultaneously to opposite ends of ClpP peptidase to form active hybrid complexes. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[32]  R. Hengge-aronis,et al.  The response regulator RssB, a recognition factor for σS proteolysis in Escherichia coli, can act like an anti‐σS factor , 2000 .

[33]  A. Horwich,et al.  ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[34]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Regulatory Subunits of Energy-Dependent Proteases , 1997, Cell.

[35]  M. Eck,et al.  Structural basis of degradation signal recognition by SspB, a specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP proteolytic machine. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[36]  T. Baker,et al.  Flexible linkers leash the substrate binding domain of SspB to a peptide module that stabilizes delivery complexes with the AAA+ ClpXP protease. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[37]  R. Sauer,et al.  The ClpXP and ClpAP proteases degrade proteins with carboxy-terminal peptide tails added by the SsrA-tagging system. , 1998, Genes & development.

[38]  B. Bukau,et al.  MecA, an adaptor protein necessary for ClpC chaperone activity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Isolation and characterization of ClpX, a new ATP-dependent specificity component of the Clp protease of Escherichia coli. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.