Development of a microfluidic platform integrating high-resolution microstructured biomaterials to study cell-material interactions.

Microfluidic screening platforms offer new possibilities for performing in vitro cell-based assays with higher throughput and in a setting that has the potential to closely mimic the physiological microenvironment. Integrating functional biomaterials into such platforms is a promising approach to obtain a deeper insight into the interactions occurring at the cell-material interface. The success of such an approach is, however, largely dependent on the ability to miniaturize the biomaterials as well as on the choice of the assay used to study the cell-material interactions. In this work, we developed a microfluidic device, the main component of which is made of a widely used biocompatible polymer, polylactic acid (PLA). This device enabled cell culture under different fluidic regimes, including perfusion and diffusion. Through a combination of photolithography, two-photon polymerization and hot embossing, it was possible to microstructure the surface of the cell culture chamber of the device with highly defined geometrical features. Furthermore, using pyramids with different heights and wall microtopographies as an example, adhesion, morphology and distribution of human MG63 osteosarcoma cells were studied. The results showed that both the height of the topographical features and the microstructural properties of their walls affected cell spreading and distribution. This proof-of-concept study shows that the platform developed here is a useful tool for studying interactions between cells and clinically relevant biomaterials under controlled fluidic regimes.

[1]  Raquel O. Rodrigues,et al.  Polymer microfluidic devices: an overview of fabrication methods , 2017 .

[2]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Cell-instructive high-resolution micropatterned polylactic acid surfaces , 2017, Biofabrication.

[3]  N. Gadegaard,et al.  Nanotopography controls cell cycle changes involved with skeletal stem cell self-renewal and multipotency , 2017, Biomaterials.

[4]  Antonios G Mikos,et al.  Poly(lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[5]  Amir A Zadpoor,et al.  Nanopattern-induced osteogenic differentiation of stem cells - A systematic review. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[6]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Advanced Surfaces for Stem Cell Research , 2016 .

[7]  R. Truckenmüller,et al.  Independent effects of the chemical and microstructural surface properties of polymer/ceramic composites on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  R. Truckenmüller,et al.  Controlling Growth and Osteogenic Differentiation of Osteoblasts on Microgrooved Polystyrene Surfaces , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Fabrication of adjacent micropillar arrays with different heights for cell studies , 2016 .

[10]  Sidra Waheed,et al.  3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Phil Stephens,et al.  Simple and Versatile 3D Printed Microfluidics Using Fused Filament Fabrication , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  Pamela Habibovic,et al.  High-throughput screening approaches and combinatorial development of biomaterials using microfluidics. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Surface micropatterning with zirconia and calcium phosphate ceramics by micromoulding in capillaries. , 2016, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[14]  D. Grant,et al.  In vitro degradation and mechanical properties of PLA-PCL copolymer unit cell scaffolds generated by two-photon polymerization , 2016, Biomedical materials.

[15]  Sharon Gerecht,et al.  Microfluidics and biomaterials to study angiogenesis , 2016 .

[16]  M. Hacker,et al.  Multi-Functional Macromers for Hydrogel Design in Biomedical Engineering and Regenerative Medicine , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[17]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Evaluating Biomaterial- and Microfluidic-Based 3D Tumor Models. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  B. Le Pioufle,et al.  Reproducing topography and roughness of osteoconductive biomaterials in a microfluidic device , 2015, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  J. Holopainen,et al.  Osteogenic and osteoclastogenic differentiation of co-cultured cells in polylactic acid-nanohydroxyapatite fiber scaffolds. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[20]  M. Dalby,et al.  Using biomaterials to study stem cell mechanotransduction, growth and differentiation , 2015, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[21]  M. Davidson,et al.  Microtubule-dependent transport and dynamics of vimentin intermediate filaments , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  J. Samitier,et al.  Adhesion and migration of cells responding to microtopography. , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  Bernke J Papenburg,et al.  Analysis of high-throughput screening reveals the effect of surface topographies on cellular morphology. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  A M Seifalian,et al.  Nanotopography and plasma treatment: redesigning the surface for vascular graft endothelialisation. , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[25]  C. Blitterswijk,et al.  Microfluidic platform with four orthogonal and overlapping gradients for soluble compound screening in regenerative medicine research , 2015, Electrophoresis.

[26]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. , 2015, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[27]  P. Gruber,et al.  Enzymatic synthesis of hyaluronic acid vinyl esters for two-photon microfabrication of biocompatible and biodegradable hydrogel constructs , 2014 .

[28]  B. Mazzolai,et al.  Nanostructured Brownian surfaces prepared through two-photon polymerization: investigation of stem cell response. , 2014, ACS Nano.

[29]  P. Friedl,et al.  Plasticity of the actin cytoskeleton in response to extracellular matrix nanostructure and dimensionality. , 2014, Biochemical Society transactions.

[30]  Barbara Mazzolai,et al.  The Osteoprint: a bioinspired two-photon polymerized 3-D structure for the enhancement of bone-like cell differentiation. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[31]  C. Lim,et al.  Substrate topography determines the fate of chondrogenesis from human mesenchymal stem cells resulting in specific cartilage phenotype formation. , 2014, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[32]  Lan Liao,et al.  Osteogenic Properties of PBLG-g-HA/PLLA Nanocomposites , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  Deok-Ho Kim,et al.  Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells using nanopatterned PEG-GelMA-HA hydrogels. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[34]  Todd C. McDevitt,et al.  Materials as stem cell regulators. , 2014, Nature materials.

[35]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. , 2014, Nature materials.

[36]  Pamela Habibovic,et al.  Microtiter plate-sized standalone chip holder for microenvironmental physiological control in gas-impermeable microfluidic devices. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[37]  K. Bayless,et al.  Vimentin as an Integral Regulator of Cell Adhesion and Endothelial Sprouting , 2014, Microcirculation.

[38]  Albert Folch,et al.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[39]  Kshitiz,et al.  Spatial control of adult stem cell fate using nanotopographic cues. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[40]  Pawel Herzyk,et al.  Nanotopographical Effects on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Morphology and Phenotype , 2014, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[41]  M. Mrksich,et al.  Geometric control of vimentin intermediate filaments. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[42]  K. Neoh,et al.  Enhanced endothelial differentiation of adipose‐derived stem cells by substrate nanotopography , 2014, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[43]  Barbara Mazzolai,et al.  Two-photon polymerization of sub-micrometric patterned surfaces: investigation of cell-substrate interactions and improved differentiation of neuron-like cells. , 2013, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[44]  A. Ovsianikov,et al.  Three-Dimensional Microfabrication of Protein Hydrogels via Two-Photon-Excited Thiol-Vinyl Ester Photopolymerization , 2013 .

[45]  Josep A Planell,et al.  3D printed PLA-based scaffolds , 2013, Organogenesis.

[46]  Pamela Habibovic,et al.  Regeneration-on-a-chip? The perspectives on use of microfluidics in regenerative medicine. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[47]  Bahareh Behkam,et al.  A PEG-DA microfluidic device for chemotaxis studies , 2013 .

[48]  Brendon M. Baker,et al.  Microfluidics embedded within extracellular matrix to define vascular architectures and pattern diffusive gradients. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[49]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Superimposed topographic and chemical cues synergistically guide neurite outgrowth. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[50]  Cleo Choong,et al.  Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[51]  D. Prodanov,et al.  Substrate Topography Determines Neuronal Polarization and Growth In Vitro , 2013, PloS one.

[52]  A. Woolley,et al.  Advances in microfluidic materials, functions, integration, and applications. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[53]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Bioinformatics-based selection of a model cell type for in vitro biomaterial testing. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[54]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[55]  Ying Zheng,et al.  In vitro microvessels for the study of angiogenesis and thrombosis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  B N Chichkov,et al.  Two-photon polymerization-generated and micromolding-replicated 3D scaffolds for peripheral neural tissue engineering applications , 2012, Biofabrication.

[57]  David Beebe,et al.  Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[58]  Woo Y. Lee,et al.  Microfluidic 3D bone tissue model for high-throughput evaluation of wound-healing and infection-preventing biomaterials. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[59]  Matthew C. Mowlem,et al.  Characterisation of an irreversible bonding process for COC–COC and COC–PDMS–COC sandwich structures and application to microvalves , 2011 .

[60]  D. Di Carlo,et al.  Rapid prototyping polymers for microfluidic devices and high pressure injections. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[61]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  R. Wyrwa,et al.  Two‐Photon Polymerization of Biocompatible Photopolymers for Microstructured 3D Biointerfaces , 2011 .

[63]  N. Gadegaard,et al.  Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. , 2011, Nature materials.

[64]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Biomimetic microtopography to enhance osteogenesis in vitro. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[65]  Lu Wang,et al.  Engineering of a microfluidic cell culture platform embedded with nanoscale features. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[66]  S. N. Murthy,et al.  Vimentin organization modulates the formation of lamellipodia , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[67]  Jeffrey T. Borenstein,et al.  Biomaterials-based microfluidics for engineered tissue constructs , 2010 .

[68]  S. Desobry,et al.  Poly-Lactic Acid: Production, Applications, Nanocomposites, and Release Studies. , 2010, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[69]  Robert D. Goldman,et al.  Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[70]  C. Fotakis,et al.  On the design and fabrication by two-photon polymerization of a readily assembled micro-valve , 2010 .

[71]  Aleksandr Ovsianikov,et al.  Two-photon polymerization of microneedles for transdermal drug delivery , 2010, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[72]  A. Janorkar,et al.  Poly(lactic acid) modifications , 2010 .

[73]  F. Omenetto,et al.  Bio‐microfluidics: Biomaterials and Biomimetic Designs , 2010, Advanced materials.

[74]  B. Helfand,et al.  Introducing intermediate filaments: from discovery to disease. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[75]  Jeong‐Yeol Yoon,et al.  Reusable, polyethylene glycol-structured microfluidic channel for particle immunoassays , 2009, Journal of biological engineering.

[76]  Aleksandr Ovsianikov,et al.  Fabrication of Polymer Microneedles Using a Two-Photon Polymerization and Micromolding Process , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[77]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[78]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Quantitative measurement and control of oxygen levels in microfluidic poly(dimethylsiloxane) bioreactors during cell culture , 2007, Biomedical microdevices.

[79]  A. Mata,et al.  Fabrication of multi-layer SU-8 microstructures , 2006 .

[80]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  A soft lithographic approach to fabricate patterned microfluidic channels. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[81]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[82]  Donald Garlotta,et al.  A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid) , 2001 .

[83]  E. Fuchs,et al.  An Epidermal Plakin That Integrates Actin and Microtubule Networks at Cellular Junctions , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[84]  Elaine Fuchs,et al.  Integrators of the Cytoskeleton that Stabilize Microtubules , 1999, Cell.

[85]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[86]  P. Matsudaira,et al.  Actin crosslinking proteins at the leading edge. , 1994, Seminars in cell biology.

[87]  R. Maciel Filho,et al.  Poly (Lactic Acid) Production for Tissue Engineering Applications , 2012 .

[88]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Precipitation of nanohydroxyapatite on PLLA/PBLG/Collagen nanofibrous structures for the differentiation of adipose derived stem cells to osteogenic lineage. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[89]  J. Samitier,et al.  Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. , 2009, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.