Time evolution of the importance of nodes in dynamic networks

For a long time now, researchers have worked on defining different metrics able to characterize the importance of nodes in networks. Among them, centrality measures have proved to be pertinent as they relate the position of a node in the structure to its ability to diffuse an information efficiently. The case of dynamic networks, in which nodes and links appear and disappear over time, led the community to propose extensions of those classical measures. Yet, they do not investigate the fact that the network structure evolves and that node importance may evolve accordingly. In the present paper, we propose temporal extensions of notions of centrality, which take into account the paths existing at any given time, in order to study the time evolution of nodes' importance in dynamic networks. We apply this to two datasets and show that the importance of nodes does indeed vary greatly with time. We also show that in some cases it might be meaningless to try to identify nodes that are consistently important over time, thus strengthening the interest of temporal extensions of centrality measures.

[1]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[2]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Graph Metrics for Temporal Networks , 2013, ArXiv.

[3]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Path lengths, correlations, and centrality in temporal networks , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Temporal reachability graphs , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[5]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Centrality metric for dynamic networks , 2010, MLG '10.

[6]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Time-Dependent Complex Networks: Dynamic Centrality, Dynamic Motifs, and Cycles of Social Interactions , 2009 .

[7]  Alexander V. Mantzaris,et al.  Discovering and validating influence in a dynamic online social network , 2013, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[8]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[9]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal node centrality in complex networks. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Jafar Adibi,et al.  Discovering important nodes through graph entropy the case of Enron email database , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[11]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[12]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[13]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Betweenness in time dependent networks , 2015 .

[14]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Incremental closeness centrality for dynamically changing social networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013).

[16]  Afonso Ferreira,et al.  Computing Shortest, Fastest, and Foremost Journeys in Dynamic Networks , 2003, Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci..

[17]  V. Latora,et al.  A measure of centrality based on network efficiency , 2004, cond-mat/0402050.

[18]  Marcelo Dias de Amorim,et al.  The Accordion Phenomenon: Analysis, Characterization, and Impact on DTN Routing , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[19]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[20]  Matthieu Latapy,et al.  Outskewer: Using Skewness to Spot Outliers in Samples and Time Series , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[21]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources , 2009, WSM@MM.

[22]  Alex Borges Vieira,et al.  Time Centrality in Dynamic Complex Networks , 2015, Adv. Complex Syst..