EVALUATION OF SOLUTION VARIANTS IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN BY MEANS OF ADEQUATE SENSITIVITY INDICES

Every engineering product is exposed to a multitude of uncertain influencing factors during the different stages of its life cycle. While much effort is invested to deal with this uncertainty during production and use, it often is not adequately taken into account in product development. Moreover, especially in the early design stages well-know methods of probabilistic uncertainty analysis often cannot be applied adequately. They necessitate an elaborated concept or even a mathematical description of the underlying relationships. In this contribution an approach to assess the influence of different design parameters in a network of physical effects is proposed, based on available methods for sensitivity analysis. The different indices are examined with regard to their applicability during Conceptual Design. Quantitative, but usually highly complex methods are thereby complemented by qualitative ones. In this way, the approach allows to deal with the changing as well as usually low level of information and supports the evaluation of concepts on an abstract level of description.

[1]  Holger Hanselka,et al.  A Model to Categorise Uncertainty in Load-Carrying Systems , 2010 .

[2]  Andrea Bohn,et al.  Selection Of Physical Effects Based On Disturbances And Robustness Ratios In The Early Phases Of Robust Design , 2011 .

[3]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in the evaluation of investment projects , 2006 .

[4]  Janez Rihtarsic,et al.  SOPHY - TOOL FOR STRUCTURAL SYNHTESIS OF CONCEPTUAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS , 2010 .

[5]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Robert Stone,et al.  The risk in early design method , 2009 .

[7]  M. H. Gedig,et al.  Qualitative & Semi-Quantitative Reasoning Techniques for Engineering Projects at Conceptual Stage , 2003 .

[8]  P. Jovanović,et al.  Application of sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation under uncertainty and risk , 1999 .

[9]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[10]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Graph Representation of Physical Effect Networks in Conceptual Design , 2009 .

[11]  Hermann Kloberdanz,et al.  An Assignment of Methods to Analyze Uncertainty in Different Stages of the Development Process , 2010 .

[12]  Bo Bergman,et al.  Variation Mode and Effect Analysis: a Practical Tool for Quality Improvement , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[13]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Verifying the Usability of Failure-Based Computational Design Methods , 2010 .

[14]  Shun Takai,et al.  The Maximum Resource Allocation for Uncertainty Reduction in a Decision-analytic Concept Selection , 2010, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[15]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[16]  Karlheinz Roth,et al.  Konstruieren Mit Konstruktionskatalogen , 1994 .