Derivation of pediatric within-individual biological variation by indirect sampling method: an LMS approach.

OBJECTIVES Pediatric within-individual biological variation (CVi) is a challenge to derive by direct sampling due to clinical, logistical, and ethical barriers. METHODS Laboratory results of 22 basic biochemistry tests performed on 9,356 children who visited primary care physicians more than once over a year were obtained from a large laboratory network in Australia. The CVi were calculated as (CVT (2) - CVa (2))(0.5), where CVT was the coefficient of variation between repeat measurements and CVa was the analytical imprecision. Smoothed 50th centile (median) CVi charts were derived using the LMS ChartMaker Light software (Medical Research Council, Cambridge, England) with L, M, and S parameters fixed at 3.0, 3.0, and 3.0 equivalent degrees of freedom, respectively. RESULTS In general, the median CVi trends for this pediatric cohort remained relatively stable with increasing age. Only aspartate aminotransferase, globulin, phosphate, urea, and creatinine had differences between the highest and lowest median CVi of more than 30%. The differences between the child and adult CVi were relatively small. Nearly all the analytes had child to adult CVi ratios of 1.0 ± 0.5. CONCLUSIONS The median CVi derived from patients with only two repeat biochemistry measurements may be considered reasonable estimates of CVi among children seeking treatment at primary care settings. The LMS approach allowed visualization of the continuous trends of CVi with age and extended the pediatric CVi estimation to younger than 4 years.

[1]  Khosrow Adeli,et al.  Pediatric within-day biological variation and quality specifications for 38 biochemical markers in the CALIPER cohort. , 2014, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  Virtudes Alvarez,et al.  Within-subject biological variation in disease: collated data and clinical consequences , 2007, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[3]  J O Westgard,et al.  Allowable imprecision for laboratory tests based on clinical and analytical test outcome criteria. , 1994, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  K. Chihara,et al.  Standardized centile curves and reference intervals of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels in a normal Japanese population using the LMS method. , 2012, Endocrine journal.

[5]  P. Baghurst,et al.  Development of paediatric biochemistry centile charts as a complement to laboratory reference intervals , 2014, Pathology.

[6]  T Koivula,et al.  Reference intervals developed from data for hospitalized patients: computerized method based on combination of laboratory and diagnostic data. , 1994, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  Sverre Sandberg,et al.  Confidence intervals and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals. , 2012, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  V. Grey,et al.  Establishing and evaluating pediatric thyroid reference intervals on the Roche Modular Analytics E 170 using computational statistics and data-mining techniques. , 2011, Clinical biochemistry.

[9]  T J Cole,et al.  Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  J P Braun,et al.  A new approach for the determination of reference intervals from hospital-based data. , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[11]  H E Solberg,et al.  Using a hospitalized population to establish reference intervals: pros and cons. , 1994, Clinical chemistry.

[12]  Hans Pottel,et al.  Establishing age/sex related serum creatinine reference intervals from hospital laboratory data based on different statistical methods. , 2008, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[13]  Werner Wosniok,et al.  Reference limits of plasma and serum creatinine concentrations from intra-laboratory data bases of several German and Italian medical centres: Comparison between direct and indirect procedures. , 2010, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[14]  B. Shine Use of routine clinical laboratory data to define reference intervals , 2008, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[15]  Graham Ross Dallas Jones,et al.  Validating common reference intervals in routine laboratories. , 2014, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[16]  C G Fraser,et al.  Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. , 1989, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[17]  Alexander Katayev,et al.  Establishing reference intervals for clinical laboratory test results: is there a better way? , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.