CTA Contrast Enhancement of the Aorta and Pulmonary Artery: The Effect of Saline Chase Injected at Two Different Rates in a Canine Experimental Model

Objective:To investigate the effect of saline chase injected at 2 different rates on computed tomography (CT) angiography. Materials and Methods:This study was approved by our institutional animal study committee. Three injection protocols were used; contrast injection (24 mL, 0.8 mL/s) without saline chase (protocol A), contrast injection with saline chase injected at the same rate as the contrast medium (protocol B), and contrast injection with saline chase injected at half the rate (0.4 mL/s) of the contrast medium (protocol C). In the 3 dogs used in our study, each of the protocols was applied twice for every dog resulting in a total of 18 sessions of monitoring scans. CT images were acquired every second at the fixed level of the aorta and pulmonary artery (PA). The duration of plateau, plateau deviation, and peak arterial enhancement were computed and compared using the Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U test. Results:Peak contrast enhancements were significantly more delayed with protocol B than with protocol A in both the PA (B: 48 seconds, A: 30 seconds, P = 0.024) and aorta (B: 46 seconds, A: 38 seconds, P = 0.024). The duration of enhancement plateau was longer with protocol B than with protocol A in PA (B: 14.8 seconds, A: 9.0 seconds, P = 0.002) and in aorta (B: 16.2 seconds, A: 11.6 seconds, P = 0.004). Protocol C had the longest duration of plateau in both PA (34.5 seconds, P = 0.002) and aorta (33.8 seconds, P = 0.004) with uniform plateau enhancement. The peak enhancement values of protocol C, however, were substantially lower than that of protocol A and B in both the PA (A: 262 HU, B: 239 HU, C: 191 HU, P = 0.001) and aorta (A: 263 HU, B: 268 HU, C: 210 HU, P = 0.001). Conclusions:Saline chase prolongs the duration of plateau and delays peak enhancement of the pulmonary artery and aorta. Saline chase injected at half the rate of contrast medium injection allowed more uniform and prolonged plateau contrast enhancement than other protocols.

[1]  G D Rubin,et al.  Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. , 2000, Radiology.

[2]  T. Mosher,et al.  Thoracic spiral CT: delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution in a power injector. , 1997, Radiology.

[3]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Contrast Bolus Optimization for Cardiac 16-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison of Contrast Medium Formulations Containing 300 and 400 Milligrams of Iodine Per Milliliter , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[4]  D. DeLong,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms at multi-detector row helical CT: optimization with interactive determination of scanning delay and contrast medium dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  J. Goo,et al.  Determination of optimal timing window for pulmonary artery MDCT angiography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  T. Winter,et al.  Using a saline chaser to decrease contrast media in abdominal CT. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  16-MDCT aortography with a low-dose contrast material protocol. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. Matoba,et al.  Usefulness of a Saline Flush for Intravenous 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Portography Using Multidetector-Row Helical Computed Tomography , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Perfusion CT with iodinated contrast material. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  K. Bae,et al.  Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  R. Schoellnast,et al.  Improvement of parenchymal and vascular enhancement using saline flush and power injection for multiple-detector-row abdominal CT , 2004, European Radiology.

[12]  R W Günther,et al.  Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Tillich,et al.  Aortoiliac Enhancement During Computed Tomography Angiography With Reduced Contrast Material Dose and Saline Solution Flush: Influence on Magnitude and Uniformity of the Contrast Column , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser , 2004, European Radiology.

[15]  Yuji Itai,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced CT With Saline Flush Technique Using Two Automated Injectors: How Much Contrast Medium Does It Save? , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  J P Heiken,et al.  Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  M. Tillich,et al.  Abdominal Multidetector Row Computed Tomography: Reduction of Cost and Contrast Material Dose Using Saline Flush , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.