Comparative genomics of chondrichthyan Hoxa clusters

BackgroundThe chondrichthyan or cartilaginous fish (chimeras, sharks, skates and rays) occupy an important phylogenetic position as the sister group to all other jawed vertebrates and as an early lineage to diverge from the vertebrate lineage following two whole genome duplication events in vertebrate evolution. There have been few comparative genomic analyses incorporating data from chondrichthyan fish and none comparing genomic information from within the group. We have sequenced the complete Hoxa cluster of the Little Skate (Leucoraja erinacea) and compared to the published Hoxa cluster of the Horn Shark (Heterodontus francisci) and to available data from the Elephant Shark (Callorhinchus milii) genome project.ResultsA BAC clone containing the full Little Skate Hoxa cluster was fully sequenced and assembled. Analyses of coding sequences and conserved non-coding elements reveal a strikingly high level of conservation across the cartilaginous fish, with twenty ultraconserved elements (100%,100 bp) found between Skate and Horn Shark, compared to three between human and marsupials. We have also identified novel potential non-coding RNAs in the Skate BAC clone, some of which are conserved to other species.ConclusionWe find that the Little Skate Hoxa cluster is remarkably similar to the previously published Horn Shark Hoxa cluster with respect to sequence identity, gene size and intergenic distance despite over 180 million years of separation between the two lineages. We suggest that the genomes of cartilaginous fish are more highly conserved than those of tetrapods or teleost fish and so are more likely to have retained ancestral non-coding elements. While useful for isolating homologous DNA, this complicates bioinformatic approaches to identify chondrichthyan-specific non-coding DNA elements

[1]  D. Duboule,et al.  Atypical relaxation of structural constraints in Hox gene clusters of the green anole lizard. , 2009, Genome research.

[2]  A. Smit,et al.  Functional noncoding sequences derived from SINEs in the mammalian genome. , 2006, Genome research.

[3]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  B. Venkatesh,et al.  Rapidly evolving fish genomes and teleost diversity. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[5]  D. Haussler,et al.  Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome , 2004, Science.

[6]  W Miller,et al.  Hox cluster genomics in the horn shark, Heterodontus francisci. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Chuong B. Do,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1101/gr.926603 References , 2003 .

[8]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments , 2009, Bioinform..

[9]  Denis Duboule,et al.  The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters , 2007, Development.

[10]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments , 2009, Bioinform..

[11]  R. Russell,et al.  Principles of MicroRNA–Target Recognition , 2005, PLoS biology.

[12]  Nicholas H. Putnam,et al.  The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Daniel Chourrout,et al.  Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  Justin Johnson,et al.  Survey Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of the Elephant Shark (Callorhinchus milii) Genome , 2007, PLoS biology.

[15]  Ken Dewar,et al.  Molecular evolution of the HoxA cluster in the three major gnathostome lineages , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. Bartel,et al.  MicroRNAs in the Hox network: an apparent link to posterior prevalence , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  G. Barlow,et al.  Fishes of the world , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[18]  Lior Pachter,et al.  VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Michael T. McManus,et al.  The microRNA miR-196 acts upstream of Hoxb8 and Shh in limb development , 2005, Nature.

[20]  Michael Pheasant,et al.  Large-scale appearance of ultraconserved elements in tetrapod genomes and slowdown of the molecular clock. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Bichir HoxA cluster sequence reveals surprising trends in ray-finned fish genomic evolution. , 2003, Genome research.

[22]  Shankar Balasubramanian,et al.  Prevalence of quadruplexes in the human genome , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  G. Cowles Studies of Mascarene Island birds: The fossil record , 1987 .

[24]  D. Bartel,et al.  MicroRNA-Directed Cleavage of HOXB8 mRNA , 2004, Science.

[25]  R. Durbin,et al.  RNA sequence analysis using covariance models. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Yiqiang Zhao,et al.  Genome-wide analysis reveals regulatory role of G4 DNA in gene transcription. , 2008, Genome research.

[27]  G. Naylor,et al.  Phylogenetic Relationships among the Major Lineages of Modern Elasmobranchs , 2004 .

[28]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  Principles of MicroRNATarget Recognition , 2005 .

[29]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Exclusion of repetitive DNA elements from gnathostome Hox clusters. , 2004, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[30]  Y L Wang,et al.  Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. , 1998, Science.

[31]  Axel Meyer,et al.  Hox clusters as models for vertebrate genome evolution. , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[32]  S. Brenner,et al.  Large number of ultraconserved elements were already present in the jawed vertebrate ancestor. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  M. Benton,et al.  Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  William McGinnis,et al.  Homeobox genes and axial patterning , 1992, Cell.