Shades of Green: Measuring the Value of Urban Forests in the Housing Market

Abstract Urban areas can contain public parks, protected forests, unprotected (or undeveloped) forest areas, and trees growing around a house or in the neighborhood surrounding the house. Each type of forest cover provides different amenities to the homeowner and to society at large. In particular, while trees on a parcel of land or in a neighborhood may add value for homeowners, the ecological value of these trees as habitat is far less than large, unbroken parcels of forest. We explore different definitions of forest cover and greenness and assess the relative value of these various types of forest cover to homeowners. Using data from the Research Triangle region of North Carolina, we test the hypothesis that trees on a parcel or in the neighborhood around that parcel are substitutes for living near large blocks of forest. The findings have implications for land-use planning efforts and habitat conservation in particular.

[1]  S. Ustin,et al.  Rainfall Interception by Sacramento's Urban Forest , 1998, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[2]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Needs and Fears: The Response to Trees and Nature in the Inner City , 1984, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[3]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring the Vernal Advancement and Retrogradation (Green Wave Effect) of Natural Vegetation. [Great Plains Corridor] , 1973 .

[4]  David J. Sailor,et al.  Simulations of annual degree day impacts of urban vegetative augmentation , 1998 .

[5]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Preferred Features of Urban Parks and Forests , 1982, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material , 1972 .

[7]  T. Carlson,et al.  An assessment of satellite remotely-sensed land cover parameters in quantitatively describing the climatic effect of urbanization , 1998 .

[8]  V. Sheets,et al.  Affect, Cognition, and Urban Vegetation , 1991 .

[9]  James R. Simpson,et al.  Air Pollutant Uptake by Sacramento's Urban Forest , 1998, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[10]  Robert W. Miller,et al.  Using Gis to Assess Urban Tree Canopy Benefits and Surrounding Greenspace Distributions , 1999, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[11]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Application of wildland scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape , 1983 .

[12]  D. Civco.  Numerical modeling of eastern connecticut's visual resources , 1979 .

[13]  Robert D. Bixler,et al.  Nature is Scary, Disgusting, and Uncomfortable , 1997 .

[14]  D. J. Morales,et al.  The Contribution of Trees to Residential Property Value , 1980, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[15]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[16]  H. Akbari,et al.  The Wind-Shielding and Shading Effects of Trees on Residential Heating and Cooling Requirements , 1990 .

[17]  F. Duhme,et al.  GIS Assessment of Munich's Urban Forest Structure for Urban Planning , 2000, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[18]  L. L. Bennett,et al.  Valuing Open Space and Land-Use Patterns in Urban Watersheds , 2001 .

[19]  Brent L. Mahan,et al.  Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach , 1996 .

[20]  Rebecca L. Johnson,et al.  The Impact of Forests and Forest Management on Neighboring Property Values , 2002 .

[21]  R. Kadmon,et al.  Studying Long-Term Vegetation Dynamics Using Digital Processing of Historical Aerial Photographs , 1999 .

[22]  N. Bockstael,et al.  Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS , 1997 .

[23]  W. Chameides,et al.  The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. , 1988, Science.

[24]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the impact of urbanization on scenic quality: land use change in the northeast , 1979 .

[25]  S. Takagi,et al.  Natural History , 2019, Nature.

[26]  Christopher D. Elvidge,et al.  Satellite-based detection of global urban heat-island temperature influence , 2002 .

[27]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Using GIS to Incorporate Visibility in Hedonic Property Value Models , 2002, Land Economics.

[28]  P. Gobster.  Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks , 1998 .

[29]  P. G. Allen,et al.  Valuation of urban parks , 1988 .

[30]  Elena G. Irwin,et al.  The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values , 2002, Land Economics.

[31]  William N. Cannon,et al.  The Esthetic Contribution of Trees to Residential Streets in Ohio Towns , 1983, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[32]  E. Gregory McPherson,et al.  Assessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest , 1992, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[33]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[34]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Visual impact of hillside development: Comparison of measurements derived from aerial and ground-level photographs , 1988 .

[35]  E. Irwin,et al.  Endogenous Spatial Externalities: Empirical Evidence and Implications for the Evolution of Exurban Residential Land Use Patterns , 2004 .

[36]  Paul Thorsnes,et al.  The Value of a Suburban Forest Preserve: Estimates from Sales of Vacant Residential Building Lots , 2002, Land Economics.

[37]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Visual Quality of Residential Streets: Both Street and Yard Trees Make a Difference , 1987, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[38]  J. Luttik.  The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands , 2000 .

[39]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento , 1998 .

[40]  V. Smith,et al.  Treating open space as an urban amenity , 2002 .

[41]  Douglas D. Piirto,et al.  Valuation of Tree Aesthetics on Small Urban-Interface Properties , 1999, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[42]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Theoretical limits to the estimation of the leaf area index on the basis of visible and near-infrared remote sensing data , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[43]  N. Powe,et al.  Valuation of urban amenities using an hedonic price model , 1995 .

[44]  Esteban Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Avifaunal Use of Wooded Streets in an Urban Landscape , 2000 .

[45]  C. Tucker.  Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[46]  N. Bockstael,et al.  EVIDENCE OF THE EFFECTS OF WATER QUALITY ON RESIDENTIAL LAND PRICES , 2000 .

[47]  E. Irwin,et al.  The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values , 2001 .

[48]  R. Degraaf.  Residential Forest Structure in Urban and Suburban Environments: Some Wildlife Implications in New England , 1985, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[49]  Noelwah R. Netusil,et al.  THE EFFECT OF OPEN SPACES ON A HOME'S SALE PRICE , 2001 .

[50]  David J. Nowak,et al.  Air pollution removal by Chicago's urban forest , 1994 .

[51]  W. Solecki,et al.  Urban parks: green spaces or green walls? , 1995 .

[52]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Property Prices and Urban Forest Amenities , 2000 .

[53]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Influence of Trees on Residential Property Values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A. ) : A Survey based on Actual Sales Prices , 1988 .

[54]  William C. Sullivan,et al.  Fertile Ground for Community: Inner-City Neighborhood Common Spaces , 1998 .

[55]  Ralph A. Sanders,et al.  URBAN VEGETATION IMPACTS ON THE HYDROLOGY OF DAYTON, OHIO , 1986 .