Interpreting popular reports of science: what happens when the reader's world meets the world on paper?

Ninety-one senior high school students were asked to read four popular reports of science. These students were nearing completion of on average four senior high school science courses either in biology, chemistry, or physics, or some combination. The reports were chosen from recent issues of a popular science magazine, a nonscience magazine, and newspaper. Students were asked before reading each report to answer a question about their background beliefs on the topic. After reading each report, they were asked whether they were more certain, less certain, or equally certain of their background beliefs, and what had made up their minds. There was a lack of systematic relationship between students' degree of certainty in their beliefs, and the support that the reports offer for those beliefs, because students tended not to integrate well their background beliefs and text information. Apparently, the students failed to distinguish between their conclusions and the reasons they offered for them.

[1]  C. Beal.  Development of knowledge about the role of inference in text comprehension. , 1990, Child development.

[2]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises , 1994 .

[3]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[4]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  The Relevance of a Reader's Knowledge within a Perspectival View of Reading , 1994 .

[5]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[6]  L. Yore.  Secondary science teachers' attitudes toward and beliefs about science reading and science textbooks , 1991 .

[7]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Assessing literacy in science: evaluation of scientific news briefs , 1997 .

[8]  E. Jenkins.  School science education: towards a reconstruction , 1992 .

[9]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[10]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning from physics text: A synthesis of recent research , 1994 .

[11]  Kenneth A. Strike,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[12]  D. Hodson,et al.  Science for All--Motives, Meanings, and Implications. , 1988 .

[13]  Adina Koch,et al.  Skills needed for reading comprehension of physics texts and their relation to problem‐solving ability , 1995 .

[14]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science , 1994 .

[15]  S. Norris,et al.  Explanations of Reading Comprehension: Schema Theory and Critical Thinking Theory , 1987, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[16]  M. Shamos,et al.  The Myth of Scientific Literacy , 1995 .

[17]  Richard C. Anderson.  Some Reflections on the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1984 .