Assessing Study-Specific Regional Variations in fMRI Signal

In this paper, we present a post hoc method for identifying regions where functional MRI data are subject to signal reduction that may compromise sensitivity to activations. The motivation for developing this technique derives from recent language studies that showed responses in the inferior temporal lobe that could be detected by PET but not by fMRI. Reduced signal is due mostly to susceptibility artifacts and can be identified by comparing the T2* images (which are subject to susceptibility artifacts) with T2 images (which are not). However, T2 images are not usually acquired in fMRI studies. Therefore, we propose that areas with reduced signal can be identified by comparing T2* images that are corrected for nonuniformity with the original uncorrected images. The technique provides a voxel-wise characterization of signal reduction that pertains to the particular data that enter into a statistical model. It requires only the functional data and can thus be applied post hoc and without any additional scans.

[1]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain: data acquisition and analysis , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Eslinger,et al.  Multi‐gradient echo with susceptibility inhomogeneity compensation (MGESIC): Demonstration of fMRI in the olfactory cortex at 3.0 T , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Echo-planar imaging : theory, technique and application , 1998 .

[5]  S Li,et al.  A computer simulation of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regionally Specific Sensitivity Differences in fMRI and PET: Where Do They Come From? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[9]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Sources of distortion in functional MRI data , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  R. Turner,et al.  Echo‐planar time course MRI of cat brain oxygenation changes , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  R R Edelman,et al.  Single breath‐hold volumetric imaging of the heart using magnetization‐prepared 3‐dimensional segmented echo planar imaging , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  M. Raichle,et al.  Anatomic Localization and Quantitative Analysis of Gradient Refocused Echo-Planar fMRI Susceptibility Artifacts , 1997, NeuroImage.

[15]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J. Reichenbach,et al.  Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient‐echo imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  T. Mosher,et al.  Removal of local field gradient artifacts in T2*‐weighted images at high fields by gradient‐echo slice excitation profile imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  R S Balaban,et al.  Comparison of EPI gradient‐echo contrast changes in cat brain caused by respiratory challenges with direct simultaneous evaluation of cerebral oxygenation via a cranial window , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[19]  G H Glover,et al.  3D z‐shim method for reduction of susceptibility effects in BOLD fMRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  P. Reber,et al.  Correction of off resonance‐related distortion in echo‐planar imaging using EPI‐based field maps , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Susceptibility-Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  T. Shallice,et al.  Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. , 2000, Science.

[23]  S Li,et al.  Three‐dimensional mapping of the static magnetic field inside the human head , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.