Non-invasive analysis of melanoma thickness by means of dermoscopy: a retrospective study

Epiluminescence microscopy (ELM), or dermatoscopy, is a non-invasive technique for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma that may play a role in the non-invasive, preoperative assessment of melanoma thickness. This study investigated the correlation between the frequency of appearance of some standard ELM criteria and the histological thickness of melanomas. In addition, the possible role of the total dermoscopic score (TDS) according to ABCD rule of dermoscopy as a predictor of melanoma thickness was analysed. The dermoscopic images of 84 cutaneous melanomas were retrospectively investigated to evaluate the presence of 10 standard ELM criteria, and for each lesion the TDS was established (with observers blinded as to the tumour thickness). A statistically significant association was found between the presence of an irregular pigment network and melanomas with a Breslow index equal to or lower than 0.75 mm (positive predictive value of 68%); in contrast, radial streaming, atypical vascular pattern and grey-blue areas were associated with melanomas > 0.75 mm (positive predictive values of 77%, 65% and 70%, respectively). Of the melanomas thinner than 0.76 mm, 82% showed a TDS lower than 6.80 (optimized cut-off point), while 79% of melanomas thicker than 0.75 mm had a TDS higher than 6.80 (χ2 = 30.815, P < 0.001); the positive predictive value of a TDS > 6.80 in the detection of lesions thicker than 0.75 mm was 79%. In conclusion, a statistically significant correlation does exist between some dermoscopic features and melanoma thickness. Both the mostly used dermoscopic methods (standard ELM pattern analysis and the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy) may provide useful information in the non-invasive assessment of melanoma thickness. However, their diagnostic performance is far from 100%; further studies are needed to investigate whether the combination of dermoscopy with other non-invasive approaches (e.g. sonometry) may result in an overall improvement in the diagnostic performance.

[1]  J Smolle,et al.  Terminology in surface microscopy. Consensus meeting of the Committee on Analytical Morphology of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Forschung, Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany, Nov. 17, 1989. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  A. Cochran,et al.  Management of Early-Stage Melanoma by Intraoperative Lymphatic Mapping and Selective Lymphadenectomy: An Alternative to Routine Elective Lymphadenectomy or “Watch and Wait” , 1992 .

[3]  L Naldi,et al.  Reliability and inter-observer agreement of dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic naevi , 1998, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[4]  Gary S. Rogers,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Melanoma: NIH Consensus Development Panel on Early Melanoma , 1992 .

[5]  F. Kiesewetter,et al.  Clinical relevance of sonometry‐derived tumour thickness in malignant melanoma—a statistical analysis , 1995, The British journal of dermatology.

[6]  W. Stolz,et al.  The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Clinical and dermatoscopic criteria for the preoperative evaluation of cutaneous melanoma thickness. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[8]  L. Hughes,et al.  A policy of selective excision for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. , 1985, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy: criteria of cutaneous melanoma progression. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  D. Coit,et al.  Sentinel lymph node evaluation in melanoma. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[11]  L GOLDMAN,et al.  Some investigative studies of pigmented nevi with cutaneous microscopy. , 1951, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  D. Reintgen,et al.  The Progression of Melanoma Nodal Metastasis Is Dependent on Tumor Thickness of the Primary Lesion , 1999, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  A. Kopf,et al.  Histopathologic Correlates of Structures Seen on Dermoscopy (Epiluminescence Microscopy) , 1993, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[14]  K. Horgan,et al.  Safe margins in the excision of primary cutaneous melanoma , 1993, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  P. Carli,et al.  Preoperative assessment of melanoma thickness by ABCD score of dermatoscopy. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  E. R. Farmer,et al.  NIH Consensus conference. Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma. , 1992, JAMA.

[17]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[19]  D. Sanders,et al.  Does palpability of primary cutaneous melanoma predict dermal invasion? , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[20]  H. Kittler,et al.  Morphologic changes of pigmented skin lesions: a useful extension of the ABCD rule for dermatoscopy. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.