Object-based attention in Chinese readers of Chinese words: Beyond Gestalt principles

Most object-based attention studies use objects defined bottom-up by Gestalt principles. In the present study, we defined objects top-down, using Chinese words that were seen as objects by skilled readers of Chinese. Using a spatial cuing paradigm, we found that a target character was detected faster if it was in the same word as the cued character than if it was in a different word. Because there were no bottom-up factors that distinguished the words, these results showed that objects defined by subjects’ knowledge—in this case, lexical information—can also constrain the deployment of attention.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Shaun P. Vecera,et al.  Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly , 1994 .

[8]  G. Logan The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. , 1996, Psychological review.

[9]  A F Kramer,et al.  Object-based attentional selection--grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: comment on vecera and Farah (1994). , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  S. Vecera Grouped arrays versus object-based representations : Reply to Kramer et al. (1997) , 1997 .

[11]  Barry D. Vaughan,et al.  Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion , 1998 .

[12]  Zhe Chen Switching attention within and between objects : The role of subjective organization , 1998 .

[13]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  What are the units of visual short-term memory, objects or spatial locations? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  A B Sekuler,et al.  The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  E. Awh,et al.  Evidence for Two Components of Object-Based Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[16]  R. Zemel,et al.  Experience-Dependent Perceptual Grouping and Object-Based Attention , 2002 .

[17]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Allocating visual attention to grouped objects , 2005 .

[18]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Attending to space within and between objects: Implications from a patient with Balint's syndrome , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.