The Impact of Back-Sputtered Carbon on the Accelerator Grid Wear Rates of the NEXT and NSTAR Ion Thrusters

A study was conducted to quantify the impact of back-sputtered carbon on the downstream accelerator grid erosion rates of the NEXT (NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster) Long Duration Test. A similar analysis that was conducted for the NSTAR (NASA's Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Applications Readiness Program) Life Demonstration Test was used as a foundation for the analysis developed herein. A new carbon surface coverage model was developed that accounted for multiple carbon adlayers before complete surface coverage is achieved. The resulting model requires knowledge of more model inputs, so they were conservatively estimated using the results of past thin film sputtering studies and particle reflection predictions. In addition, accelerator current densities across the grid were rigorously determined using an ion optics code to determine accelerator current distributions and an algorithm to determine beam current densities along a grid using downstream measurements. The improved analysis was applied to the NSTAR test results for evaluation. The improved analysis demonstrated that the impact of back-sputtered carbon on pit and groove wear rate for the NSTAR LDT was negligible throughout most of eroded grid radius. The improved analysis also predicted the accelerator current density for transition from net erosion to net deposition considerably more accurately than the original analysis. The improved analysis was used to estimate the impact of back-sputtered carbon on the accelerator grid pit and groove wear rate of the NEXT Long Duration Test. Unlike the NSTAR analysis, the NEXT analysis was more challenging because the thruster was operated for extended durations at various operating conditions and was unavailable for measurements because the test is ongoing. As a result, the NEXT LDT estimates presented herein are considered preliminary until the results of future post- test analyses are incorporated. The worst-case impact of carbon back-sputtering was determined to be the full power operating condition, but the maximum impact of back- sputtered carbon was only a four percent reduction in wear rate. As a result, back-sputtered carbon is estimated to have an insignificant impact on the first failure mode of the NEXT LDT at all operating conditions.

[1]  James E. Polk,et al.  The effect of carbon deposition on accelerator grid wear rates in ion engine ground testing , 2000 .

[2]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Development Status and Performance , 2007 .

[3]  Jonathan L. Van Noord.  NEXT Ion Thruster Thermal Model , 2007 .

[4]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[5]  James S. Sovey,et al.  NEXT PM1R Ion Thruster and Propellant Management System Wear Test Results , 2009 .

[6]  J. Polk,et al.  Desorption of chemisorbed Carbon on Mo(1 0 0) by noble gas ion sputtering: Validation of ground test measurements of ion engine lifetimes , 2006 .

[7]  James E. Polk,et al.  Carbon Sputtering Yield Measurements at Grazing Incidence , 2006 .

[8]  G. Betz,et al.  Energy and angular distributions of sputtered particles , 1994 .

[9]  John R. Anderson,et al.  An Overview of the Results from the 30,000 Hr Life Test of Deep Space 1 Flight Spare Ion Engine , 2004 .

[10]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (Next) Long-Duration Test as of 736 Kg of Propellant Throughput , 2013 .

[11]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of the NEXT Long-Duration Test After 23,300 Hours of Operation , 2009 .

[12]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Demonstration of the NSTAR ion propulsion system on the Deep Space One mission , 2001 .

[13]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  In-Flight Operation of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System Through Orbit Capture at Vesta , 2011 .

[14]  Y. Yamamura,et al.  ENERGY DEPENDENCE OF ION-INDUCED SPUTTERING YIELDS FROM MONATOMIC SOLIDS AT NORMAL INCIDENCE , 1996 .

[15]  K. Wasa,et al.  Handbook of sputter deposition technology , 1992 .

[16]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Long-Duration Test Plume and Wear Characteristics after 16,550 h of Operation and 337 kg of Xenon Processed , 2008 .

[17]  Daniel A. Herman,et al.  Application of the NEXT Ion Thruster Lifetime Assessment to Thruster Throttling , 2008 .

[18]  H. F. Winters,et al.  Sputtering of chemisorbed gas (nitrogen on tungsten) by low‐energy ions , 1974 .

[19]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Engine 2000 Hour Wear Test Results , 2004 .

[20]  James E. Polk,et al.  Numerical simulations of ion thruster accelerator grid erosion , 2002 .

[21]  Shigeru Hayakawa,et al.  Handbook of sputter deposition technology : principles, technology, and applications , 1992 .

[22]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Progress Towards Technology Readiness , 2008 .

[23]  G. K. Wehner,et al.  Sputtering Yields for Low Energy He+‐, Kr+‐, and Xe+‐Ion Bombardment , 1962 .